The Effect of Artificial Intelligence as a Peer-to-Peer Support Tool on Engagement, Grades and Pass Rates Peer-to-Peer
Saved in:
| Title: | The Effect of Artificial Intelligence as a Peer-to-Peer Support Tool on Engagement, Grades and Pass Rates Peer-to-Peer |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Mark Wilson-Trollip (ORCID |
| Source: | Perspectives in Education. 2025 43(1):239-266. |
| Availability: | University of the Free State Faculty of Education. P.O. Box 339, Bioemfontein 9300, South Africa. Tel: +27-51-401-2368; e-mail: PiE@ufs.ac.za; Web site: https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/pie/index |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 28 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Artificial Intelligence, Peer Teaching, Learner Engagement, Academic Achievement, Student Improvement, At Risk Students, Prediction, Educational Technology, Technology Uses in Education, College Students, Grades (Scholastic) |
| DOI: | 10.38140/pie.v43i1.8911 |
| ISSN: | 0258-2236 2519-593X |
| Abstract: | The study examines artificial intelligence's (AI) role in peer-to-peer learning and its impact on student engagement, academic performance, and pass rates. The research provided insights into how AI influences student engagement and grades through a mixed-methods approach. The research methodology adopted an interpretivist approach that includes aspects of positivism. The design employs induction using qualitative and quantitative methods. The case study operates at a longitudinal time range to study temporal performance developments. The primary data collection uses analysis of external data. The findings indicate a slight improvement in grades (3-5%), lacking statistical significance (p > 0.05) and a significant level of engagement (95%). This statistic raises questions about the relationship between increased engagement and tangible academic outcomes. Students show enhanced engagement through AI-driven personalised learning pathways and continuous feedback systems. Through predictive AI systems, institutions can immediately identify students facing performance-related challenges. AI peer-to-peer support must become accessible to every student without restricting it to only at-risk students. AI application policies in universities must follow mechanisms that allow adjustment for various student peer-learning environments. Partnership with AI developers remains crucial to integrate technology momentum with teaching targets. All AI pteer-support policies need to include ethical criteria to maintain responsible deployment. The results suggest that while AI platforms can complement traditional peer support services, further research is necessary to understand their long-term effects on academic performance and retention. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1478182 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1478182 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Effect of Artificial Intelligence as a Peer-to-Peer Support Tool on Engagement, Grades and Pass Rates Peer-to-Peer – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mark+Wilson-Trollip%22">Mark Wilson-Trollip</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4219-3125">0009-0001-4219-3125</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Perspectives+in+Education%22"><i>Perspectives in Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 43(1):239-266. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: University of the Free State Faculty of Education. P.O. Box 339, Bioemfontein 9300, South Africa. Tel: +27-51-401-2368; e-mail: PiE@ufs.ac.za; Web site: https://journals.ufs.ac.za/index.php/pie/index – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 28 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Peer+Teaching%22">Peer Teaching</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learner+Engagement%22">Learner Engagement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Achievement%22">Academic Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Improvement%22">Student Improvement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22At+Risk+Students%22">At Risk Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prediction%22">Prediction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Technology%22">Educational Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grades+%28Scholastic%29%22">Grades (Scholastic)</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.38140/pie.v43i1.8911 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0258-2236<br />2519-593X – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The study examines artificial intelligence's (AI) role in peer-to-peer learning and its impact on student engagement, academic performance, and pass rates. The research provided insights into how AI influences student engagement and grades through a mixed-methods approach. The research methodology adopted an interpretivist approach that includes aspects of positivism. The design employs induction using qualitative and quantitative methods. The case study operates at a longitudinal time range to study temporal performance developments. The primary data collection uses analysis of external data. The findings indicate a slight improvement in grades (3-5%), lacking statistical significance (p > 0.05) and a significant level of engagement (95%). This statistic raises questions about the relationship between increased engagement and tangible academic outcomes. Students show enhanced engagement through AI-driven personalised learning pathways and continuous feedback systems. Through predictive AI systems, institutions can immediately identify students facing performance-related challenges. AI peer-to-peer support must become accessible to every student without restricting it to only at-risk students. AI application policies in universities must follow mechanisms that allow adjustment for various student peer-learning environments. Partnership with AI developers remains crucial to integrate technology momentum with teaching targets. All AI pteer-support policies need to include ethical criteria to maintain responsible deployment. The results suggest that while AI platforms can complement traditional peer support services, further research is necessary to understand their long-term effects on academic performance and retention. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1478182 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1478182 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.38140/pie.v43i1.8911 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 28 StartPage: 239 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Peer Teaching Type: general – SubjectFull: Learner Engagement Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Improvement Type: general – SubjectFull: At Risk Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Prediction Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Technology Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: College Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Grades (Scholastic) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Effect of Artificial Intelligence as a Peer-to-Peer Support Tool on Engagement, Grades and Pass Rates Peer-to-Peer Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mark Wilson-Trollip IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0258-2236 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2519-593X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 43 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Perspectives in Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |