Moodle and Google Classroom: A Comparative Study of Acceptability
Saved in:
| Title: | Moodle and Google Classroom: A Comparative Study of Acceptability |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Jamal Kay B. Rogers (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn). 2025 19(3):1670-1677. |
| Availability: | Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. C5 Plumbon, Banguntapan, Yogyakarta, 55198, Indonesia. e-mail: edulearn@uad.ac.id; Web site: http://edulearn.intelektual.org/index.php/EduLearn/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 8 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Learning Management Systems, Technology Uses in Education, College Students, Value Judgment, Usability, Student Attitudes, Foreign Countries, Program Effectiveness |
| Geographic Terms: | Philippines |
| ISSN: | 2089-9823 2302-9277 |
| Abstract: | The popularity of online learning gives rise to learning management system (LMS) development as a central medium of instruction, communication, assessment, and collaboration for flexible learning. However, different LMS platforms present different acceptability to users, making it challenging for educational institutions to choose a platform for implementation. This study used a quantitative research design to compare the acceptance scores of Moodle and Google Classroom based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Using convenience sampling, 40 students from the City College of Davao (CCD) participated in a survey to determine the perceived usefulness (PU), the perceived ease of use (PEOU), and the overall acceptance scores of the 2 LMSs. An independent t-test was used to compare the acceptance scores after determining the normality and homogeneity of the data sets. The comparative analysis determined no significant difference between the acceptance scores of Moodle and Google Classroom. Despite the limited number of participants, the findings suggest that CCD can use either of the 2 LMSs for official implementation. The findings can also inform other institutions and help them adopt the methods and recommendations in the study. The study contributes to the growing literature on technology acceptance and LMS. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1479064 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1479064 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1479064 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Moodle and Google Classroom: A Comparative Study of Acceptability – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jamal+Kay+B%2E+Rogers%22">Jamal Kay B. Rogers</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5839-0791">0000-0001-5839-0791</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Romel+P%2E+Salazar%22">Romel P. Salazar</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2424-5684">0009-0000-2424-5684</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mark+Van+M%2E+Buladaco%22">Mark Van M. Buladaco</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0231-5650">0000-0002-0231-5650</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Education+and+Learning+%28EduLearn%29%22"><i>Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)</i></searchLink>. 2025 19(3):1670-1677. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. C5 Plumbon, Banguntapan, Yogyakarta, 55198, Indonesia. e-mail: edulearn@uad.ac.id; Web site: http://edulearn.intelektual.org/index.php/EduLearn/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 8 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Management+Systems%22">Learning Management Systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Value+Judgment%22">Value Judgment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Usability%22">Usability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Philippines%22">Philippines</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2089-9823<br />2302-9277 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The popularity of online learning gives rise to learning management system (LMS) development as a central medium of instruction, communication, assessment, and collaboration for flexible learning. However, different LMS platforms present different acceptability to users, making it challenging for educational institutions to choose a platform for implementation. This study used a quantitative research design to compare the acceptance scores of Moodle and Google Classroom based on the technology acceptance model (TAM). Using convenience sampling, 40 students from the City College of Davao (CCD) participated in a survey to determine the perceived usefulness (PU), the perceived ease of use (PEOU), and the overall acceptance scores of the 2 LMSs. An independent t-test was used to compare the acceptance scores after determining the normality and homogeneity of the data sets. The comparative analysis determined no significant difference between the acceptance scores of Moodle and Google Classroom. Despite the limited number of participants, the findings suggest that CCD can use either of the 2 LMSs for official implementation. The findings can also inform other institutions and help them adopt the methods and recommendations in the study. The study contributes to the growing literature on technology acceptance and LMS. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1479064 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1479064 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 8 StartPage: 1670 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Learning Management Systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: College Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Value Judgment Type: general – SubjectFull: Usability Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Philippines Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Moodle and Google Classroom: A Comparative Study of Acceptability Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jamal Kay B. Rogers – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Romel P. Salazar – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mark Van M. Buladaco IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 2089-9823 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2302-9277 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 19 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |