Effectiveness of Generative AI in Automated Written Corrective Feedback with Prompting
Saved in:
| Title: | Effectiveness of Generative AI in Automated Written Corrective Feedback with Prompting |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Jiahui Wu (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2025 63(6):1493-1527. |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 35 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Education Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Technology Integration, Accuracy, Prompting, Writing Evaluation, Teacher Attitudes, Student Attitudes, Instructional Effectiveness, Self Efficacy, Faculty Workload, Educational Benefits, Writing Instruction, Elementary School Students, Secondary School Students, English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Second Language Learning, Foreign Countries |
| Geographic Terms: | China |
| DOI: | 10.1177/07356331251359430 |
| ISSN: | 0735-6331 1541-4140 |
| Abstract: | Automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) tools play a crucial role in supporting English writing instruction. However, issues such as insufficient accuracy and hallucination have undermined users' trust in these systems. To address these challenges, this study investigates the potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) enhanced by prompting. Specifically, we evaluate the performance of several GAI models, including GPT-4, in providing written corrective feedback compared to commercial AWCF tools and other advanced models. The study adopts a dual-method approach: (1) a comprehensive model evaluation using established English writing datasets to assess error correction performance via various prompting strategies, and (2) an empirical study involving teachers and students to examine the system's practical efficacy and users' perspective. Quantitative results indicate that GPT-4 with chain-of-thought prompting significantly outperforms commercial tools, achieving improved consistency and accuracy in error detection and correction. Qualitative feedback from participants further supports the system's potential to enhance students' writing quality and confidence, while concurrently reducing teachers' workload and optimizing instructional efficiency, despite concerns regarding occasional overcorrection. These findings emphasize the benefits of task-specific prompting in GAI-based AWCF systems and provide actionable insights for integrating advanced AI feedback into educational practices. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1480245 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1480245 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Effectiveness of Generative AI in Automated Written Corrective Feedback with Prompting – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jiahui+Wu%22">Jiahui Wu</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5465-0019">0009-0006-5465-0019</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jianwei+Li%22">Jianwei Li</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5704-6216">0000-0002-5704-6216</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zigang+Ge%22">Zigang Ge</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1733-2429">0000-0002-1733-2429</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mingrui+Xu%22">Mingrui Xu</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li+Lin%22">Li Lin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ru+Zhang%22">Ru Zhang</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Educational+Computing+Research%22"><i>Journal of Educational Computing Research</i></searchLink>. 2025 63(6):1493-1527. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 35 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Error+Correction%22">Error Correction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Software%22">Computer Software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Integration%22">Technology Integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accuracy%22">Accuracy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prompting%22">Prompting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Evaluation%22">Writing Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Attitudes%22">Teacher Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Effectiveness%22">Instructional Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Efficacy%22">Self Efficacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Workload%22">Faculty Workload</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Benefits%22">Educational Benefits</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Instruction%22">Writing Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+School+Students%22">Elementary School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+School+Students%22">Secondary School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22">English (Second Language)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Instruction%22">Second Language Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Learning%22">Second Language Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22China%22">China</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1177/07356331251359430 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0735-6331<br />1541-4140 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) tools play a crucial role in supporting English writing instruction. However, issues such as insufficient accuracy and hallucination have undermined users' trust in these systems. To address these challenges, this study investigates the potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) enhanced by prompting. Specifically, we evaluate the performance of several GAI models, including GPT-4, in providing written corrective feedback compared to commercial AWCF tools and other advanced models. The study adopts a dual-method approach: (1) a comprehensive model evaluation using established English writing datasets to assess error correction performance via various prompting strategies, and (2) an empirical study involving teachers and students to examine the system's practical efficacy and users' perspective. Quantitative results indicate that GPT-4 with chain-of-thought prompting significantly outperforms commercial tools, achieving improved consistency and accuracy in error detection and correction. Qualitative feedback from participants further supports the system's potential to enhance students' writing quality and confidence, while concurrently reducing teachers' workload and optimizing instructional efficiency, despite concerns regarding occasional overcorrection. These findings emphasize the benefits of task-specific prompting in GAI-based AWCF systems and provide actionable insights for integrating advanced AI feedback into educational practices. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1480245 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1480245 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/07356331251359430 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 35 StartPage: 1493 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Error Correction Type: general – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response) Type: general – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Software Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Integration Type: general – SubjectFull: Accuracy Type: general – SubjectFull: Prompting Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Self Efficacy Type: general – SubjectFull: Faculty Workload Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Benefits Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Secondary School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: English (Second Language) Type: general – SubjectFull: Second Language Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: China Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Effectiveness of Generative AI in Automated Written Corrective Feedback with Prompting Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jiahui Wu – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jianwei Li – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zigang Ge – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mingrui Xu – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Li Lin – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ru Zhang IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0735-6331 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1541-4140 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 63 – Type: issue Value: 6 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Educational Computing Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |