Effectiveness of Generative AI in Automated Written Corrective Feedback with Prompting

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Effectiveness of Generative AI in Automated Written Corrective Feedback with Prompting
Language: English
Authors: Jiahui Wu (ORCID 0009-0006-5465-0019), Jianwei Li (ORCID 0000-0002-5704-6216), Zigang Ge (ORCID 0000-0002-1733-2429), Mingrui Xu, Li Lin, Ru Zhang
Source: Journal of Educational Computing Research. 2025 63(6):1493-1527.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 35
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Education
Secondary Education
Descriptors: Error Correction, Feedback (Response), Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Technology Integration, Accuracy, Prompting, Writing Evaluation, Teacher Attitudes, Student Attitudes, Instructional Effectiveness, Self Efficacy, Faculty Workload, Educational Benefits, Writing Instruction, Elementary School Students, Secondary School Students, English (Second Language), Second Language Instruction, Second Language Learning, Foreign Countries
Geographic Terms: China
DOI: 10.1177/07356331251359430
ISSN: 0735-6331
1541-4140
Abstract: Automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) tools play a crucial role in supporting English writing instruction. However, issues such as insufficient accuracy and hallucination have undermined users' trust in these systems. To address these challenges, this study investigates the potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) enhanced by prompting. Specifically, we evaluate the performance of several GAI models, including GPT-4, in providing written corrective feedback compared to commercial AWCF tools and other advanced models. The study adopts a dual-method approach: (1) a comprehensive model evaluation using established English writing datasets to assess error correction performance via various prompting strategies, and (2) an empirical study involving teachers and students to examine the system's practical efficacy and users' perspective. Quantitative results indicate that GPT-4 with chain-of-thought prompting significantly outperforms commercial tools, achieving improved consistency and accuracy in error detection and correction. Qualitative feedback from participants further supports the system's potential to enhance students' writing quality and confidence, while concurrently reducing teachers' workload and optimizing instructional efficiency, despite concerns regarding occasional overcorrection. These findings emphasize the benefits of task-specific prompting in GAI-based AWCF systems and provide actionable insights for integrating advanced AI feedback into educational practices.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1480245
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1480245
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Effectiveness of Generative AI in Automated Written Corrective Feedback with Prompting
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jiahui+Wu%22">Jiahui Wu</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5465-0019">0009-0006-5465-0019</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jianwei+Li%22">Jianwei Li</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5704-6216">0000-0002-5704-6216</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zigang+Ge%22">Zigang Ge</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1733-2429">0000-0002-1733-2429</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mingrui+Xu%22">Mingrui Xu</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Li+Lin%22">Li Lin</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ru+Zhang%22">Ru Zhang</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Educational+Computing+Research%22"><i>Journal of Educational Computing Research</i></searchLink>. 2025 63(6):1493-1527.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 35
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Error+Correction%22">Error Correction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Software%22">Computer Software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Integration%22">Technology Integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accuracy%22">Accuracy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prompting%22">Prompting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Evaluation%22">Writing Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Attitudes%22">Teacher Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Effectiveness%22">Instructional Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Efficacy%22">Self Efficacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Faculty+Workload%22">Faculty Workload</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Benefits%22">Educational Benefits</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Instruction%22">Writing Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+School+Students%22">Elementary School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+School+Students%22">Secondary School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22">English (Second Language)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Instruction%22">Second Language Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Learning%22">Second Language Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22China%22">China</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1177/07356331251359430
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0735-6331<br />1541-4140
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Automated written corrective feedback (AWCF) tools play a crucial role in supporting English writing instruction. However, issues such as insufficient accuracy and hallucination have undermined users' trust in these systems. To address these challenges, this study investigates the potential of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) enhanced by prompting. Specifically, we evaluate the performance of several GAI models, including GPT-4, in providing written corrective feedback compared to commercial AWCF tools and other advanced models. The study adopts a dual-method approach: (1) a comprehensive model evaluation using established English writing datasets to assess error correction performance via various prompting strategies, and (2) an empirical study involving teachers and students to examine the system's practical efficacy and users' perspective. Quantitative results indicate that GPT-4 with chain-of-thought prompting significantly outperforms commercial tools, achieving improved consistency and accuracy in error detection and correction. Qualitative feedback from participants further supports the system's potential to enhance students' writing quality and confidence, while concurrently reducing teachers' workload and optimizing instructional efficiency, despite concerns regarding occasional overcorrection. These findings emphasize the benefits of task-specific prompting in GAI-based AWCF systems and provide actionable insights for integrating advanced AI feedback into educational practices.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1480245
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1480245
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/07356331251359430
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 35
        StartPage: 1493
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Error Correction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer Software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technology Integration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Accuracy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Prompting
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Instructional Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self Efficacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Faculty Workload
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Benefits
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Elementary School Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Secondary School Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: English (Second Language)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Second Language Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: China
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Effectiveness of Generative AI in Automated Written Corrective Feedback with Prompting
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jiahui Wu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jianwei Li
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Zigang Ge
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mingrui Xu
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Li Lin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ru Zhang
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 10
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0735-6331
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1541-4140
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 63
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Educational Computing Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1