View in EDS PDF Full Text

Against Tasks and Hallucinations: Returning to Thought in the Age of Machine Learning

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Against Tasks and Hallucinations: Returning to Thought in the Age of Machine Learning
Language: English
Authors: Lily Lucas Hodges
Source: History Teacher. 2025 58(4):409-430.
Availability: Society for History Education. California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840-1601. Tel: 562-985-2573; Fax: 562-985-5431; Web site: http://www.societyforhistoryeducation.org/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 22
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Essays, Computer Uses in Education, History Instruction, College Students, Writing (Composition), Process Education
Geographic Terms: California
ISSN: 0018-2745
1945-2292
Abstract: A standard learning outcome for students in humanities courses, from middle school into higher education, is to craft clear, specific arguments based on evidence. A common assignment to develop and assess this learning outcome is the take-home essay. Generative AI models, such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and Grammarly, are quickly able to generate such essays, from the brainstorming process to the final draft. One way teachers assess if students used AI to write their essay is by running student papers through Turnitin, itself an example of AI. Since AI is not a word-for-word form of plagiarism, the best Turnitin can do is provide a measure of the probability of AI use. However, students have self-reported high usage of AI in surveys. Unsurprisingly, teacher concerns over student use of AI have increased. These concerns seem well-founded, considering a 2023 study revealed that a majority of students indicated they would continue to use AI even if instructors prohibited it. In this article, the author reviews student discussions of AI and the take-home essay in a lower-division history course called "LGBTQ America" at Chapman University in California. After the discussions, students then investigated AI-generated essays through a "deconstructed essay" and reflected on the process. An analysis of their class discussion and submitted work offers insight into the limitations and possibilities of engaging with AI, highlighting both a general student desire to continue writing take-home essays and a unique set of teachable moments offered by engagement with generative AI.
Abstractor: ERIC
Entry Date: 2025
Access URL: https://www.societyforhistoryeducation.org/A25Preview.html
Accession Number: EJ1482241
Database: ERIC
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwG2U4T3FfXIZJt_5yvZ-kaiAAAA4jCB3wYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHRMIHOAgEAMIHIBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDPdeX831pkVLjSnthgIBEICBmm38HLHTisHmqA-4yAADkcUfSzQAA0cvbGEdUsmbf32wF_0K2RVSVTiFJ8fRTm_cfok9UHW5is48hVgUdw9lo_eQI77nXjeIhmJgbTayvWDh8AZLsinn0KhXKpZL0EJxu4Lt8HjbYuumMSjAaYoxG1nBpgDr3Fa_7ZdonJpMsPv9VRk9wkyjwYxPrHCqoPvDnO9hPyx5MLaIQJA=
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1482241
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Against Tasks and Hallucinations: Returning to Thought in the Age of Machine Learning
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lily+Lucas+Hodges%22">Lily Lucas Hodges</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22History+Teacher%22"><i>History Teacher</i></searchLink>. 2025 58(4):409-430.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Society for History Education. California State University, Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Boulevard, Long Beach, CA 90840-1601. Tel: 562-985-2573; Fax: 562-985-5431; Web site: http://www.societyforhistoryeducation.org/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 22
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Evaluative
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Essays%22">Essays</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Uses+in+Education%22">Computer Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22History+Instruction%22">History Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+%28Composition%29%22">Writing (Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Process+Education%22">Process Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22California%22">California</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0018-2745<br />1945-2292
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: A standard learning outcome for students in humanities courses, from middle school into higher education, is to craft clear, specific arguments based on evidence. A common assignment to develop and assess this learning outcome is the take-home essay. Generative AI models, such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and Grammarly, are quickly able to generate such essays, from the brainstorming process to the final draft. One way teachers assess if students used AI to write their essay is by running student papers through Turnitin, itself an example of AI. Since AI is not a word-for-word form of plagiarism, the best Turnitin can do is provide a measure of the probability of AI use. However, students have self-reported high usage of AI in surveys. Unsurprisingly, teacher concerns over student use of AI have increased. These concerns seem well-founded, considering a 2023 study revealed that a majority of students indicated they would continue to use AI even if instructors prohibited it. In this article, the author reviews student discussions of AI and the take-home essay in a lower-division history course called "LGBTQ America" at Chapman University in California. After the discussions, students then investigated AI-generated essays through a "deconstructed essay" and reflected on the process. An analysis of their class discussion and submitted work offers insight into the limitations and possibilities of engaging with AI, highlighting both a general student desire to continue writing take-home essays and a unique set of teachable moments offered by engagement with generative AI.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: ERIC
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: URL
  Label: Access URL
  Group: URL
  Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://www.societyforhistoryeducation.org/A25Preview.html" linkWindow="_blank">https://www.societyforhistoryeducation.org/A25Preview.html</link>
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1482241
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1482241
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 22
        StartPage: 409
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Essays
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer Uses in Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: History Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing (Composition)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Process Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: California
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Against Tasks and Hallucinations: Returning to Thought in the Age of Machine Learning
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Lily Lucas Hodges
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0018-2745
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1945-2292
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 58
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: History Teacher
              Type: main
ResultId 1