Do Active Learning Techniques Promote Higher Academic Performance in an Online Graduate Anatomy Course?
Saved in:
| Title: | Do Active Learning Techniques Promote Higher Academic Performance in an Online Graduate Anatomy Course? |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | L. J. Bradley, K. E. Meyer, M. S. Kerr, S. D. Maddux, A. J. Heck, R. E. Reeves, E. K. Handler |
| Source: | Anatomical Sciences Education. 2025 18(9):972-984. |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 13 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Active Learning, Online Courses, Anatomy, Instructional Effectiveness, Graduate Students, Allied Health Occupations Education, Academic Achievement, Masters Programs |
| Geographic Terms: | Texas (Fort Worth) |
| DOI: | 10.1002/ase.70066 |
| ISSN: | 1935-9772 1935-9780 |
| Abstract: | Human anatomy is a foundational course in graduate health professional programs. Given the increased enrollment in anatomy courses, along with the development of new technologies, institutions are increasingly compelled to provide alternative course formats, including online learning. Similarly, higher education is increasingly transitioning from traditional lecture-based learning to methods that allow students to actively participate in their own learning process (i.e., active learning). Active learning has been shown to have many benefits, including enhanced academic performance. Few studies have investigated the impact of active learning techniques on students' academic performance in online graduate anatomy courses. This study investigates differences in examination performance following participation in four active learning techniques (jigsaw, team-learning module, concept mapping, and question constructing). Specifically, this study investigated whether academic performance differed between learning objectives assigned to students during an active learning activity compared to non-assigned learning objectives for each unit. One hundred seventy (170) students completed the online anatomy course. Results showed that academic performance generally did not significantly differ between students who participated in active learning (regardless of technique) and a control group. However, students who participated in active learning were found to perform significantly better on examination questions specifically related to the objective they were required to teach compared to the objectives they learned from their peers. The results of this study suggest that the benefits of active learning on academic performance are largely attributable to preparatory processes required for peer teaching, as recipient peer-learners appear to gain minimal benefits from active learning. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1482674 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1482674 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Do Active Learning Techniques Promote Higher Academic Performance in an Online Graduate Anatomy Course? – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22L%2E+J%2E+Bradley%22">L. J. Bradley</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22K%2E+E%2E+Meyer%22">K. E. Meyer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22M%2E+S%2E+Kerr%22">M. S. Kerr</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22S%2E+D%2E+Maddux%22">S. D. Maddux</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22A%2E+J%2E+Heck%22">A. J. Heck</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22R%2E+E%2E+Reeves%22">R. E. Reeves</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22E%2E+K%2E+Handler%22">E. K. Handler</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Anatomical+Sciences+Education%22"><i>Anatomical Sciences Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 18(9):972-984. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 13 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Active+Learning%22">Active Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Online+Courses%22">Online Courses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Anatomy%22">Anatomy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Effectiveness%22">Instructional Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+Students%22">Graduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Allied+Health+Occupations+Education%22">Allied Health Occupations Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Achievement%22">Academic Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Masters+Programs%22">Masters Programs</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Texas+%28Fort+Worth%29%22">Texas (Fort Worth)</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1002/ase.70066 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1935-9772<br />1935-9780 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Human anatomy is a foundational course in graduate health professional programs. Given the increased enrollment in anatomy courses, along with the development of new technologies, institutions are increasingly compelled to provide alternative course formats, including online learning. Similarly, higher education is increasingly transitioning from traditional lecture-based learning to methods that allow students to actively participate in their own learning process (i.e., active learning). Active learning has been shown to have many benefits, including enhanced academic performance. Few studies have investigated the impact of active learning techniques on students' academic performance in online graduate anatomy courses. This study investigates differences in examination performance following participation in four active learning techniques (jigsaw, team-learning module, concept mapping, and question constructing). Specifically, this study investigated whether academic performance differed between learning objectives assigned to students during an active learning activity compared to non-assigned learning objectives for each unit. One hundred seventy (170) students completed the online anatomy course. Results showed that academic performance generally did not significantly differ between students who participated in active learning (regardless of technique) and a control group. However, students who participated in active learning were found to perform significantly better on examination questions specifically related to the objective they were required to teach compared to the objectives they learned from their peers. The results of this study suggest that the benefits of active learning on academic performance are largely attributable to preparatory processes required for peer teaching, as recipient peer-learners appear to gain minimal benefits from active learning. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1482674 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1482674 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/ase.70066 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 972 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Active Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Online Courses Type: general – SubjectFull: Anatomy Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Graduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Allied Health Occupations Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Masters Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Texas (Fort Worth) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Do Active Learning Techniques Promote Higher Academic Performance in an Online Graduate Anatomy Course? Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: L. J. Bradley – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: K. E. Meyer – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: M. S. Kerr – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: S. D. Maddux – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: A. J. Heck – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: R. E. Reeves – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: E. K. Handler IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1935-9772 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1935-9780 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 18 – Type: issue Value: 9 Titles: – TitleFull: Anatomical Sciences Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |