View in EDS

England's Qualifications System: The Politics of Resilience

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: England's Qualifications System: The Politics of Resilience
Language: English
Authors: Michelle Meadows (ORCID 0009-0007-5200-6331), Jo-Anne Baird (ORCID 0000-0001-5974-3237), Neil Stringer (ORCID 0000-0002-1107-2259), Thomas Godfrey-Faussett (ORCID 0000-0002-1538-3257)
Source: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. 2025 37(1):127-162.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 36
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Qualifications, Politics of Education, Educational Policy, Risk Management, COVID-19, Pandemics
Geographic Terms: United Kingdom (England)
DOI: 10.1007/s11092-025-09451-2
ISSN: 1874-8597
Abstract: The UK Government's Resilience Framework aims to ensure the country's prosperity. A framework approach recognises that key risks and their effects vary by sector; however, any framework requires translation when applied in different contexts, with consideration of the issues in a sector-specific, case-based manner. Using publicly available documents, input from an expert advisory group, and elite interviews with 21 assessment insiders, we investigated the resilience of England's qualifications system. The 2020 exams crisis created by the pandemic is one focus, but we explored resilience more broadly. To define resilience, we drew upon definitions in other complex, distributed systems (food, health care, and power [electrical] supply). Our interview data showed consensus on neither the definition of resilience nor whether the system is resilient. Proposed countermeasures for perceived lack of resilience (teacher assessment, modular examinations, digitalisation) brought risks along with potential benefits. Our data showed that resilience must be defined in relation to specified aims. Many threats to resilience were identified, including political pressure--a feature of the 2020 qualification policies. We conclude that fundamentally redesigning the system for resilience to unlikely catastrophic events would be costly and require solutions that may introduce their own problems. The cause of the recent crisis is best attributed to poor policy--lacking recognition of society's expectations--rather than system fragility. Where policy values and objectives shift over time, those responsible for the system can find themselves responding to changing or conflicting priorities. We propose that a context-specific definition of resilience is required for its effective management.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1487141
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1487141
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: England's Qualifications System: The Politics of Resilience
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Michelle+Meadows%22">Michelle Meadows</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5200-6331">0009-0007-5200-6331</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jo-Anne+Baird%22">Jo-Anne Baird</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5974-3237">0000-0001-5974-3237</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Neil+Stringer%22">Neil Stringer</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1107-2259">0000-0002-1107-2259</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thomas+Godfrey-Faussett%22">Thomas Godfrey-Faussett</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1538-3257">0000-0002-1538-3257</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Educational+Assessment%2C+Evaluation+and+Accountability%22"><i>Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability</i></searchLink>. 2025 37(1):127-162.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 36
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Qualifications%22">Qualifications</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Politics+of+Education%22">Politics of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Risk+Management%22">Risk Management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22COVID-19%22">COVID-19</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pandemics%22">Pandemics</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom+%28England%29%22">United Kingdom (England)</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s11092-025-09451-2
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1874-8597
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The UK Government's Resilience Framework aims to ensure the country's prosperity. A framework approach recognises that key risks and their effects vary by sector; however, any framework requires translation when applied in different contexts, with consideration of the issues in a sector-specific, case-based manner. Using publicly available documents, input from an expert advisory group, and elite interviews with 21 assessment insiders, we investigated the resilience of England's qualifications system. The 2020 exams crisis created by the pandemic is one focus, but we explored resilience more broadly. To define resilience, we drew upon definitions in other complex, distributed systems (food, health care, and power [electrical] supply). Our interview data showed consensus on neither the definition of resilience nor whether the system is resilient. Proposed countermeasures for perceived lack of resilience (teacher assessment, modular examinations, digitalisation) brought risks along with potential benefits. Our data showed that resilience must be defined in relation to specified aims. Many threats to resilience were identified, including political pressure--a feature of the 2020 qualification policies. We conclude that fundamentally redesigning the system for resilience to unlikely catastrophic events would be costly and require solutions that may introduce their own problems. The cause of the recent crisis is best attributed to poor policy--lacking recognition of society's expectations--rather than system fragility. Where policy values and objectives shift over time, those responsible for the system can find themselves responding to changing or conflicting priorities. We propose that a context-specific definition of resilience is required for its effective management.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1487141
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1487141
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11092-025-09451-2
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 36
        StartPage: 127
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Qualifications
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Politics of Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Risk Management
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: COVID-19
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pandemics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United Kingdom (England)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: England's Qualifications System: The Politics of Resilience
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Michelle Meadows
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jo-Anne Baird
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Neil Stringer
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Thomas Godfrey-Faussett
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1874-8597
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 37
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability
              Type: main
ResultId 1