View in EDS PDF Full Text

Scaling Standard Set Marks to University Grade Boundaries in Health Education

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Scaling Standard Set Marks to University Grade Boundaries in Health Education
Language: English
Authors: Samantha L. Strong, Amy L. Sheppard
Source: Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. 2025 25(3).
Availability: Indiana University. 107 South Indiana Avenue, Bryan Hall 203B, Bloomington, IN 47405. Tel: 317-274-5647; Fax: 317-278-2360; e-mail: josotl@iu.edu; Web site: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 4
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: College Students, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Standard Setting, Scaling, Cutting Scores, Scoring
ISSN: 1527-9316
Abstract: Assessments in higher education healthcare programmes can be challenging because they not only need to be fair, valid, and transparent, but it is also necessary to gauge safety, practical skill competence, and professionalism. One way to help maximise validity in practical assessments is to utilise 'standard setting' which aims to set a fair 'cut score' (pass mark) that reflects the score expected of a 'minimally competent' candidate. This purports that if a hypothetically minimally competent candidate could achieve this score, then it should be equivalent to the minimum pass mark for that assessment i.e. everyone who performs better than that should pass. This is effective from an assessment design point of view, but then leads to the new challenge that the cut score is unlikely to be equivalent to the university-level pass mark of 40% (or 50% for postgraduate), which, in cases where the component carries 'weighting', can lead to differences in pass mark across different assessments within the same module, or the same programme, which requires a way of scaling the marks for each assessment to make the cut score align with the university-level pass mark. However, the guidance for this is limited and unclear, so we propose a method of linear interpolation which overcomes any disadvantages of percentage/mark scaling and scaling based on cohort performance. We have also shared an easy-to-use excel file which shows you how to incorporate this method of scaling into your own assessments with ease.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1487271
Database: ERIC
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwFweoWZ8UP1ZUxI78EOgxDyAAAA4zCB4AYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHSMIHPAgEAMIHJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDGHv18VZCR1VrstcWQIBEICBm1zQQePck-sKzdh1JsgK66aGlTDMJNT4gS9V_dvPyvkirVdTeXd1i3CLkx5ADUUiYDqIw4jsa3nbq0XgFLthk-Es-5sOnZJt7RHfTYhEBuBeoxXqD1rRd_f5pH4s7JaEmzx1R08j0sPca_r0R4yoZa4wU_CYbauTqusuxFD74P6izB8m35ecPWyfEHk1Ph7119LwdqMuqAIG8lax
Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1487271
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1487271
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Scaling Standard Set Marks to University Grade Boundaries in Health Education
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Samantha+L%2E+Strong%22">Samantha L. Strong</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Amy+L%2E+Sheppard%22">Amy L. Sheppard</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+the+Scholarship+of+Teaching+and+Learning%22"><i>Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning</i></searchLink>. 2025 25(3).
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Indiana University. 107 South Indiana Avenue, Bryan Hall 203B, Bloomington, IN 47405. Tel: 317-274-5647; Fax: 317-278-2360; e-mail: josotl@iu.edu; Web site: https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 4
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Standard+Setting%22">Standard Setting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scaling%22">Scaling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cutting+Scores%22">Cutting Scores</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scoring%22">Scoring</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1527-9316
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Assessments in higher education healthcare programmes can be challenging because they not only need to be fair, valid, and transparent, but it is also necessary to gauge safety, practical skill competence, and professionalism. One way to help maximise validity in practical assessments is to utilise 'standard setting' which aims to set a fair 'cut score' (pass mark) that reflects the score expected of a 'minimally competent' candidate. This purports that if a hypothetically minimally competent candidate could achieve this score, then it should be equivalent to the minimum pass mark for that assessment i.e. everyone who performs better than that should pass. This is effective from an assessment design point of view, but then leads to the new challenge that the cut score is unlikely to be equivalent to the university-level pass mark of 40% (or 50% for postgraduate), which, in cases where the component carries 'weighting', can lead to differences in pass mark across different assessments within the same module, or the same programme, which requires a way of scaling the marks for each assessment to make the cut score align with the university-level pass mark. However, the guidance for this is limited and unclear, so we propose a method of linear interpolation which overcomes any disadvantages of percentage/mark scaling and scaling based on cohort performance. We have also shared an easy-to-use excel file which shows you how to incorporate this method of scaling into your own assessments with ease.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1487271
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1487271
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 4
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: College Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Standard Setting
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scaling
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cutting Scores
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scoring
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Scaling Standard Set Marks to University Grade Boundaries in Health Education
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Samantha L. Strong
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Amy L. Sheppard
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1527-9316
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 25
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
              Type: main
ResultId 1