The Influence of Student Disengagement on a Non-Cognitive Measure: Practical Solutions for Assessment Practitioners
Saved in:
| Title: | The Influence of Student Disengagement on a Non-Cognitive Measure: Practical Solutions for Assessment Practitioners |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Katarina E. Schaefer, Sara J. Finney |
| Source: | Research & Practice in Assessment. 2025 20(1):34-48. |
| Availability: | Virginia Assessment Group.; Fax: 504-247-1232; e-mail: editor@rpajournal.com; Web site: http://www.rpajournal.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 15 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | College Students, Student Evaluation, Accountability, Student Behavior, Student Motivation, Testing, Test Items, Test Wiseness, Reaction Time, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | Attitude Scale |
| ISSN: | 2161-4210 |
| Abstract: | Some college students may be disengaged when completing assessments for institutional accountability and improvement. If disengagement is not identified and the resulting data are removed, the validity of score interpretations suffers. Using data gathered from students who completed non-consequential assessments for institutional accountability, we investigated disengagement on a non-cognitive assessment. We demonstrate how we identified students who rapidly responded to items, who "streamlined" answers across items, or who self-reported low effort. We hypothesized that some students would display at least one of these disengagement behaviors and that removing their data would result in scores that better aligned with the assessment's theoretical factor structure. Half the students who self-reported low effort and half the students who streamlined also rapidly responded. The theoretical two-factor structure of the noncognitive assessment better represented scores after removing disengaged students. We discuss the practicality of selecting a motivation filtering technique to provide more accurate outcome assessment interpretations. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1488106 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1488106 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1488106 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Influence of Student Disengagement on a Non-Cognitive Measure: Practical Solutions for Assessment Practitioners – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Katarina+E%2E+Schaefer%22">Katarina E. Schaefer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sara+J%2E+Finney%22">Sara J. Finney</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Research+%26+Practice+in+Assessment%22"><i>Research & Practice in Assessment</i></searchLink>. 2025 20(1):34-48. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Virginia Assessment Group.; Fax: 504-247-1232; e-mail: editor@rpajournal.com; Web site: http://www.rpajournal.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 15 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Behavior%22">Student Behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Motivation%22">Student Motivation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Testing%22">Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Items%22">Test Items</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Wiseness%22">Test Wiseness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reaction+Time%22">Reaction Time</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Factor+Analysis%22">Factor Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Factor+Structure%22">Factor Structure</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Attitude+Scale%22">Attitude Scale</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2161-4210 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Some college students may be disengaged when completing assessments for institutional accountability and improvement. If disengagement is not identified and the resulting data are removed, the validity of score interpretations suffers. Using data gathered from students who completed non-consequential assessments for institutional accountability, we investigated disengagement on a non-cognitive assessment. We demonstrate how we identified students who rapidly responded to items, who "streamlined" answers across items, or who self-reported low effort. We hypothesized that some students would display at least one of these disengagement behaviors and that removing their data would result in scores that better aligned with the assessment's theoretical factor structure. Half the students who self-reported low effort and half the students who streamlined also rapidly responded. The theoretical two-factor structure of the noncognitive assessment better represented scores after removing disengaged students. We discuss the practicality of selecting a motivation filtering technique to provide more accurate outcome assessment interpretations. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1488106 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1488106 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 34 Subjects: – SubjectFull: College Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Accountability Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Behavior Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Motivation Type: general – SubjectFull: Testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Items Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Wiseness Type: general – SubjectFull: Reaction Time Type: general – SubjectFull: Factor Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Factor Structure Type: general – SubjectFull: Attitude Scale Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Influence of Student Disengagement on a Non-Cognitive Measure: Practical Solutions for Assessment Practitioners Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Katarina E. Schaefer – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sara J. Finney IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2161-4210 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 20 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Research & Practice in Assessment Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |