View in EDS

Investigating the Effects of Affective Pedagogical Agent and Meta-Cognitive Prompts in Online Learning Environment

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Investigating the Effects of Affective Pedagogical Agent and Meta-Cognitive Prompts in Online Learning Environment
Language: English
Authors: Yanqing Wang (ORCID 0000-0003-2273-4796), Shaoying Gong, Ning Jia (ORCID 0009-0005-2123-5903), Ying Liu
Source: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2025 41(6).
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Metacognition, Prompting, Electronic Learning, Computer Uses in Education, Educational Technology, Instructional Design, Visual Aids, Learning Processes, Computer Assisted Instruction, Physiology, Arousal Patterns
DOI: 10.1111/jcal.70157
ISSN: 0266-4909
1365-2729
Abstract: Background: Online learning is becoming increasingly popular among learners. To enhance the effectiveness of online learning, researchers have embedded an affective pedagogical agent (PA) on the computer screen to help regulate learners' emotions and support their learning. However, previous research has paid little attention to the effects of affective PA on learners' metacognitive processing. It has also been shown that learners often do not spontaneously engage in metacognitive regulation behaviors without intervention. This study addresses this gap by examining whether affective PA provides metacognitive prompts can lead to better learning outcomes. Objectives: To explore the effects of aligning instructional design methods (e.g., adding an affective PA to computer screen) with appropriate instructional prompts (e.g., metacognitive prompts) on students' affective processing, cognitive processing, metacognitive processing, and learning performance in an online learning scenario. Methods: In a 2 (Affective PA: Affective PA vs. Neutral PA) × 2 (Metacognitive prompts: With vs. Without) between-subjects design, one hundred and twenty-four college students learned about 10 psychological concepts delivered either by an affective PA or a neutral PA. All participants' physiological arousal was recorded throughout the learning process, followed by a series of learning outcomes. More specifically, learners' physiological arousal was recorded via heart rate and skin conductance sensors, and their self-reported emotions and learning outcomes were measured using validated questionnaires. Results: The results showed that (a) Learning with an affective PA had higher physiological arousal, germane cognitive load, and transfer performance than learning with a neutral PA; (b) Metacognitive prompts improved transfer performance; (c) A neutral PA inducing learners to engage in metacognitive processing led to better learning outcomes, while affective PA providing metacognitive prompts did not facilitate learning. Conclusions: The findings demonstrated the positive role of affective PA and metacognitive prompts in promoting learning. The results of this experiment identified the interplay effects between affective PA and metacognitive prompts, which provided new perspectives for understanding the role of combining instructional design and learners' active processing to facilitate learning.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1489847
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1489847
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Investigating the Effects of Affective Pedagogical Agent and Meta-Cognitive Prompts in Online Learning Environment
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yanqing+Wang%22">Yanqing Wang</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2273-4796">0000-0003-2273-4796</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shaoying+Gong%22">Shaoying Gong</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ning+Jia%22">Ning Jia</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2123-5903">0009-0005-2123-5903</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ying+Liu%22">Ying Liu</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Computer+Assisted+Learning%22"><i>Journal of Computer Assisted Learning</i></searchLink>. 2025 41(6).
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 14
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Metacognition%22">Metacognition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prompting%22">Prompting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+Learning%22">Electronic Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Uses+in+Education%22">Computer Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Technology%22">Educational Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Design%22">Instructional Design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Visual+Aids%22">Visual Aids</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Processes%22">Learning Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Assisted+Instruction%22">Computer Assisted Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physiology%22">Physiology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Arousal+Patterns%22">Arousal Patterns</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1111/jcal.70157
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0266-4909<br />1365-2729
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Online learning is becoming increasingly popular among learners. To enhance the effectiveness of online learning, researchers have embedded an affective pedagogical agent (PA) on the computer screen to help regulate learners' emotions and support their learning. However, previous research has paid little attention to the effects of affective PA on learners' metacognitive processing. It has also been shown that learners often do not spontaneously engage in metacognitive regulation behaviors without intervention. This study addresses this gap by examining whether affective PA provides metacognitive prompts can lead to better learning outcomes. Objectives: To explore the effects of aligning instructional design methods (e.g., adding an affective PA to computer screen) with appropriate instructional prompts (e.g., metacognitive prompts) on students' affective processing, cognitive processing, metacognitive processing, and learning performance in an online learning scenario. Methods: In a 2 (Affective PA: Affective PA vs. Neutral PA) × 2 (Metacognitive prompts: With vs. Without) between-subjects design, one hundred and twenty-four college students learned about 10 psychological concepts delivered either by an affective PA or a neutral PA. All participants' physiological arousal was recorded throughout the learning process, followed by a series of learning outcomes. More specifically, learners' physiological arousal was recorded via heart rate and skin conductance sensors, and their self-reported emotions and learning outcomes were measured using validated questionnaires. Results: The results showed that (a) Learning with an affective PA had higher physiological arousal, germane cognitive load, and transfer performance than learning with a neutral PA; (b) Metacognitive prompts improved transfer performance; (c) A neutral PA inducing learners to engage in metacognitive processing led to better learning outcomes, while affective PA providing metacognitive prompts did not facilitate learning. Conclusions: The findings demonstrated the positive role of affective PA and metacognitive prompts in promoting learning. The results of this experiment identified the interplay effects between affective PA and metacognitive prompts, which provided new perspectives for understanding the role of combining instructional design and learners' active processing to facilitate learning.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1489847
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1489847
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/jcal.70157
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 14
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Metacognition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Prompting
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Electronic Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer Uses in Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Technology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Instructional Design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Visual Aids
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning Processes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer Assisted Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Physiology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Arousal Patterns
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Investigating the Effects of Affective Pedagogical Agent and Meta-Cognitive Prompts in Online Learning Environment
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Yanqing Wang
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shaoying Gong
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ning Jia
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ying Liu
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0266-4909
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1365-2729
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 41
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
              Type: main
ResultId 1