Examining the (In)Accuracies and Challenges When Rating Students' L2 Listening Notes
Saved in:
| Title: | Examining the (In)Accuracies and Challenges When Rating Students' L2 Listening Notes |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Naheen Madarbakus-Ring (ORCID |
| Source: | Language Learning in Higher Education. 2025 15(2):401-429. |
| Availability: | De Gruyter Mouton. Available from: Walter de Gruyter, Inc. 121 High Street, Third Floor, Boston, MA 02110. Tel: 857-284-7073; Fax: 857-284-7358; e-mail: service@degruyter.com; Web site: http://www.degruyter.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 29 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Teacher Researchers, Information Utilization, Scoring Rubrics, Listening, Notetaking, Second Language Learning, Grading, Decision Making, Foreign Countries |
| Geographic Terms: | Japan, Sweden |
| DOI: | 10.1515/cercles-2024-0076 |
| ISSN: | 2191-611X 2191-6128 |
| Abstract: | Information units (IUs) have been proposed as a way of grading students' notes. However, little work has been done to validate and check the reliability of such an approach. This study explores how teacher-researchers (TRs) use information units (IUs) to rate content items in students' listening notes using a rubric. Data were collected from six TRs who graded four students' listening notes. Each TR identified and rated the IUs in the students' notes using a 4-point rubric scoring system before commenting on the notes they had graded. The main aim of this study was to examine if each TR awarded similar IU ratings between the items they graded. The results showed there were inconsistencies between the TRs ratings of the students' notes. However, each TR consistently interpreted the IUs in the same way internally across multiple texts. These findings indicate that further training in using IUs is needed to add validity and reliability to the potential rating system for grading students' listening notes. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1491024 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1491024 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Examining the (In)Accuracies and Challenges When Rating Students' L2 Listening Notes – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Naheen+Madarbakus-Ring%22">Naheen Madarbakus-Ring</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0857-9515">0000-0003-0857-9515</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Michael+Crawford%22">Michael Crawford</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nathan+Thomas+Ducker%22">Nathan Thomas Ducker</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1295-1762">0000-0003-1295-1762</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Language+Learning+in+Higher+Education%22"><i>Language Learning in Higher Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 15(2):401-429. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: De Gruyter Mouton. Available from: Walter de Gruyter, Inc. 121 High Street, Third Floor, Boston, MA 02110. Tel: 857-284-7073; Fax: 857-284-7358; e-mail: service@degruyter.com; Web site: http://www.degruyter.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 29 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Researchers%22">Teacher Researchers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+Utilization%22">Information Utilization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scoring+Rubrics%22">Scoring Rubrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Listening%22">Listening</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Notetaking%22">Notetaking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Learning%22">Second Language Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grading%22">Grading</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+Making%22">Decision Making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Japan%22">Japan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sweden%22">Sweden</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1515/cercles-2024-0076 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2191-611X<br />2191-6128 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Information units (IUs) have been proposed as a way of grading students' notes. However, little work has been done to validate and check the reliability of such an approach. This study explores how teacher-researchers (TRs) use information units (IUs) to rate content items in students' listening notes using a rubric. Data were collected from six TRs who graded four students' listening notes. Each TR identified and rated the IUs in the students' notes using a 4-point rubric scoring system before commenting on the notes they had graded. The main aim of this study was to examine if each TR awarded similar IU ratings between the items they graded. The results showed there were inconsistencies between the TRs ratings of the students' notes. However, each TR consistently interpreted the IUs in the same way internally across multiple texts. These findings indicate that further training in using IUs is needed to add validity and reliability to the potential rating system for grading students' listening notes. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1491024 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1491024 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1515/cercles-2024-0076 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 29 StartPage: 401 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Teacher Researchers Type: general – SubjectFull: Information Utilization Type: general – SubjectFull: Scoring Rubrics Type: general – SubjectFull: Listening Type: general – SubjectFull: Notetaking Type: general – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Grading Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision Making Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Japan Type: general – SubjectFull: Sweden Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Examining the (In)Accuracies and Challenges When Rating Students' L2 Listening Notes Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Naheen Madarbakus-Ring – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Michael Crawford – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nathan Thomas Ducker IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 10 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 2191-611X – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2191-6128 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 15 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Language Learning in Higher Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |