What Do I Have to Do to Get the Grade? How Examination Standards Interact with Learning, Teaching and the Curriculum
Saved in:
| Title: | What Do I Have to Do to Get the Grade? How Examination Standards Interact with Learning, Teaching and the Curriculum |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Michelle Meadows, Stuart Cadwallader, Lena Gray, Jo-Anne Baird |
| Source: | Review of Education. 2025 13(3). |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 24 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, Scores, Academic Standards, Educational Attainment, Class Rank, Exit Examinations, Accountability, Assessment Literacy, Theory Practice Relationship, Praxis |
| Geographic Terms: | United Kingdom |
| DOI: | 10.1002/rev3.70126 |
| ISSN: | 2049-6613 |
| Abstract: | Communicating national qualification standards clearly to learners and their teachers is crucial to raising standards. If people do not know what they must do to get the grade, then the qualification is providing poor information about what is considered valuable learning. Assessment scores (and grades) need to convey meaning about learners' knowledge and skills. Yet score meaning is obscure, which leads to frustration on the part of teachers and learners. How standards are conceived, and set, interacts with score meaning. In this article, we outline how the current system of setting standards for GCSEs and A-levels in England, Wales and Northern Ireland--attainment-referencing--affects the clarity of grading standards. Attainment-referencing offers no single artefact to represent standards, as it is the product of an amalgam of evidence. This makes it difficult for learners and their teachers to derive score meaning from their assessment outcomes. We contrast this with other methods for setting and maintaining standards that have been suggested as better alternatives: norm- and criterion-referencing. Both, in their own ways, purport to offer greater clarity. However, norm-referencing does not relate directly to curriculum standards, but to learners' ranks with respect to a population. Criterion-referencing relates directly to the curriculum but operates better in theory than in practise--criteria can never be specified unproblematically because of the limits of language. Within the context of how standards are currently set and maintained, attainment-referencing, we suggest ways of better explaining the curriculum-related meaning of national qualification grades. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1491993 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1491993 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: What Do I Have to Do to Get the Grade? How Examination Standards Interact with Learning, Teaching and the Curriculum – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Michelle+Meadows%22">Michelle Meadows</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stuart+Cadwallader%22">Stuart Cadwallader</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lena+Gray%22">Lena Gray</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jo-Anne+Baird%22">Jo-Anne Baird</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Review+of+Education%22"><i>Review of Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 13(3). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 24 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scores%22">Scores</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Standards%22">Academic Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Attainment%22">Educational Attainment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Class+Rank%22">Class Rank</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Exit+Examinations%22">Exit Examinations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accountability%22">Accountability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Assessment+Literacy%22">Assessment Literacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theory+Practice+Relationship%22">Theory Practice Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Praxis%22">Praxis</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1002/rev3.70126 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2049-6613 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Communicating national qualification standards clearly to learners and their teachers is crucial to raising standards. If people do not know what they must do to get the grade, then the qualification is providing poor information about what is considered valuable learning. Assessment scores (and grades) need to convey meaning about learners' knowledge and skills. Yet score meaning is obscure, which leads to frustration on the part of teachers and learners. How standards are conceived, and set, interacts with score meaning. In this article, we outline how the current system of setting standards for GCSEs and A-levels in England, Wales and Northern Ireland--attainment-referencing--affects the clarity of grading standards. Attainment-referencing offers no single artefact to represent standards, as it is the product of an amalgam of evidence. This makes it difficult for learners and their teachers to derive score meaning from their assessment outcomes. We contrast this with other methods for setting and maintaining standards that have been suggested as better alternatives: norm- and criterion-referencing. Both, in their own ways, purport to offer greater clarity. However, norm-referencing does not relate directly to curriculum standards, but to learners' ranks with respect to a population. Criterion-referencing relates directly to the curriculum but operates better in theory than in practise--criteria can never be specified unproblematically because of the limits of language. Within the context of how standards are currently set and maintained, attainment-referencing, we suggest ways of better explaining the curriculum-related meaning of national qualification grades. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1491993 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1491993 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/rev3.70126 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 24 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Scores Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Standards Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Attainment Type: general – SubjectFull: Class Rank Type: general – SubjectFull: Exit Examinations Type: general – SubjectFull: Accountability Type: general – SubjectFull: Assessment Literacy Type: general – SubjectFull: Theory Practice Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Praxis Type: general – SubjectFull: United Kingdom Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: What Do I Have to Do to Get the Grade? How Examination Standards Interact with Learning, Teaching and the Curriculum Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Michelle Meadows – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stuart Cadwallader – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lena Gray – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jo-Anne Baird IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2049-6613 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 13 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Review of Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |