View in EDS

An Empty Systematic Review of the 'Pedagogy of Multiliteracies' in K-12 since 1996: A Generation Later, Evidence It Improves Literacy Outcomes Is Lacking from (Quasi-)Experimental Classroom Interventions

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: An Empty Systematic Review of the 'Pedagogy of Multiliteracies' in K-12 since 1996: A Generation Later, Evidence It Improves Literacy Outcomes Is Lacking from (Quasi-)Experimental Classroom Interventions
Language: English
Authors: Clarence Green (ORCID 0000-0003-3463-141X), Iain Giblin (ORCID 0000-0003-3240-6841)
Source: Review of Education. 2025 13(3).
Availability: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 26
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Information Analyses
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Descriptors: Multiple Literacies, Elementary Secondary Education, Outcomes of Education, Literature Reviews, Journal Articles, Evidence, Evidence Based Practice, Intervention, Educational History, Quasiexperimental Design, Educational Research, Research Problems
DOI: 10.1002/rev3.70118
ISSN: 2049-6613
Abstract: One of the most influential articles in the history of literacy education has been 'A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures' co-written by the New London Group in 1996. This seminal article introduced multiliteracies pedagogy, developed the theoretical framework for why it was needed, and outlined how teachers, curriculum planners and policy makers should implement the pedagogy. The article called for classroom-based research to establish the evidence, lacking at the time, to support that the pedagogy of multiliteracies improves student literacy outcomes. Recent reviews claim that the generation of research following the foundational article produced evidence that multiliteracies pedagogy improves several literacy outcomes. However, existing reviews have not followed systematic review protocols typically required for concluding that a pedagogy is evidence-based, so it remains unclear what evidence exists from (quasi-)experimental classroom research. This paper reports on a systematic review of 20,581 studies published since 1996 with the aim of clarifying the extent to which multiliteracies interventions have reported positive effects on any literacy outcome (K-12), in any country, through experimental/quasi-experimental research designs that measured outcomes against control/comparison groups. The result is an 'empty review', meaning no studies were found. These results point to an important limitation on claims about the pedagogical value of multiliteracies in raising literacy outcomes. With recent movements toward evidence-based practices, this study points toward opportunities for (quasi-)experimental studies to be conducted that can provide teachers with a more robust evidence base and clarity around which aspects of multiliteracies pedagogy improve which literacy outcomes.
Abstractor: As Provided
Notes: https://t.ly/2r3_i
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1492091
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1492091
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: An Empty Systematic Review of the 'Pedagogy of Multiliteracies' in K-12 since 1996: A Generation Later, Evidence It Improves Literacy Outcomes Is Lacking from (Quasi-)Experimental Classroom Interventions
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Clarence+Green%22">Clarence Green</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3463-141X">0000-0003-3463-141X</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Iain+Giblin%22">Iain Giblin</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3240-6841">0000-0003-3240-6841</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Review+of+Education%22"><i>Review of Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 13(3).
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 26
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multiple+Literacies%22">Multiple Literacies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcomes+of+Education%22">Outcomes of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Literature+Reviews%22">Literature Reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Journal+Articles%22">Journal Articles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence%22">Evidence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence+Based+Practice%22">Evidence Based Practice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intervention%22">Intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+History%22">Educational History</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Quasiexperimental+Design%22">Quasiexperimental Design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Research%22">Educational Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Problems%22">Research Problems</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1002/rev3.70118
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2049-6613
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: One of the most influential articles in the history of literacy education has been 'A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures' co-written by the New London Group in 1996. This seminal article introduced multiliteracies pedagogy, developed the theoretical framework for why it was needed, and outlined how teachers, curriculum planners and policy makers should implement the pedagogy. The article called for classroom-based research to establish the evidence, lacking at the time, to support that the pedagogy of multiliteracies improves student literacy outcomes. Recent reviews claim that the generation of research following the foundational article produced evidence that multiliteracies pedagogy improves several literacy outcomes. However, existing reviews have not followed systematic review protocols typically required for concluding that a pedagogy is evidence-based, so it remains unclear what evidence exists from (quasi-)experimental classroom research. This paper reports on a systematic review of 20,581 studies published since 1996 with the aim of clarifying the extent to which multiliteracies interventions have reported positive effects on any literacy outcome (K-12), in any country, through experimental/quasi-experimental research designs that measured outcomes against control/comparison groups. The result is an 'empty review', meaning no studies were found. These results point to an important limitation on claims about the pedagogical value of multiliteracies in raising literacy outcomes. With recent movements toward evidence-based practices, this study points toward opportunities for (quasi-)experimental studies to be conducted that can provide teachers with a more robust evidence base and clarity around which aspects of multiliteracies pedagogy improve which literacy outcomes.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: Note
  Label: Notes
  Group: Note
  Data: https://t.ly/2r3_i
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1492091
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1492091
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1002/rev3.70118
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 26
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Multiple Literacies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Outcomes of Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Literature Reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Journal Articles
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evidence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evidence Based Practice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intervention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational History
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Quasiexperimental Design
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research Problems
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: An Empty Systematic Review of the 'Pedagogy of Multiliteracies' in K-12 since 1996: A Generation Later, Evidence It Improves Literacy Outcomes Is Lacking from (Quasi-)Experimental Classroom Interventions
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Clarence Green
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Iain Giblin
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2049-6613
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 13
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Review of Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1