The Way Technology Teachers Think: The Role of Metaphor and Reflection for Technology Education Practice
Saved in:
| Title: | The Way Technology Teachers Think: The Role of Metaphor and Reflection for Technology Education Practice |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Andreas Larsson |
| Source: | Design and Technology Education. 2025 30(3):16-32. |
| Availability: | Design and Technology Association. 11 Manor Court, Banbury, OX16 5TB, UK. Tel: +44-1789-470007; Fax: +44-1789-470-007; e-mail: info@data.org.uk; Web site: https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/DesignTechnologyEducation |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 17 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Education Grade 4 Intermediate Grades Grade 5 Middle Schools Grade 6 Grade 7 Junior High Schools Secondary Education Grade 8 Grade 9 High Schools |
| Descriptors: | Figurative Language, Reflection, Technology Education, Compulsory Education, Teaching Experience, Foreign Countries, Grade 4, Grade 5, Grade 6, Grade 7, Grade 8, Grade 9, Teacher Attitudes, Cognitive Structures |
| Geographic Terms: | Sweden |
| ISSN: | 1360-1431 2040-8633 |
| Abstract: | This study investigates how technology teachers reflect on their practice by examining the metaphorical structures that underpin their reasoning. Drawing on Conceptual Metaphor Theory and supported by an AI-assisted Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP), the analysis focuses on recurring metaphorical themes that shape how teachers make sense of challenges, plan instruction, and imagine future classroom scenarios. The results reveal a set of interrelated themes -- such as time as a resource, learning as motion, teaching as burden, and structure as cohesion -- that reflect and reinforce a view of teaching as a managed and goal-oriented activity. These metaphors are not merely descriptive devices; they function as cognitive tools that organise experience and support pedagogical decision-making. By framing teaching through metaphors of motion, containment, construction, and effort, teachers can navigate complex classroom dynamics and articulate a coherent sense of professional agency. The findings suggest that metaphor plays a dual role in reflection: both representing experience and guiding prospective reasoning. In this sense, metaphors support what is often described as reflection-for-action, where familiar conceptual frames are used to simulate possible futures. By surfacing these metaphorical patterns, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how teachers conceptualise their work and offers a foundation for professional dialogue and development in technology education. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1493904 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1493904 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1493904 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Way Technology Teachers Think: The Role of Metaphor and Reflection for Technology Education Practice – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andreas+Larsson%22">Andreas Larsson</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Design+and+Technology+Education%22"><i>Design and Technology Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 30(3):16-32. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Design and Technology Association. 11 Manor Court, Banbury, OX16 5TB, UK. Tel: +44-1789-470007; Fax: +44-1789-470-007; e-mail: info@data.org.uk; Web site: https://openjournals.ljmu.ac.uk/DesignTechnologyEducation – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 17 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+4%22">Grade 4</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Intermediate+Grades%22">Intermediate Grades</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+5%22">Grade 5</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+6%22">Grade 6</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+7%22">Grade 7</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+8%22">Grade 8</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+9%22">Grade 9</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Figurative+Language%22">Figurative Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reflection%22">Reflection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Education%22">Technology Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Compulsory+Education%22">Compulsory Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Experience%22">Teaching Experience</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+4%22">Grade 4</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+5%22">Grade 5</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+6%22">Grade 6</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+7%22">Grade 7</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+8%22">Grade 8</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+9%22">Grade 9</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Attitudes%22">Teacher Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Structures%22">Cognitive Structures</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sweden%22">Sweden</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1360-1431<br />2040-8633 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study investigates how technology teachers reflect on their practice by examining the metaphorical structures that underpin their reasoning. Drawing on Conceptual Metaphor Theory and supported by an AI-assisted Metaphor Identification Procedure (MIP), the analysis focuses on recurring metaphorical themes that shape how teachers make sense of challenges, plan instruction, and imagine future classroom scenarios. The results reveal a set of interrelated themes -- such as time as a resource, learning as motion, teaching as burden, and structure as cohesion -- that reflect and reinforce a view of teaching as a managed and goal-oriented activity. These metaphors are not merely descriptive devices; they function as cognitive tools that organise experience and support pedagogical decision-making. By framing teaching through metaphors of motion, containment, construction, and effort, teachers can navigate complex classroom dynamics and articulate a coherent sense of professional agency. The findings suggest that metaphor plays a dual role in reflection: both representing experience and guiding prospective reasoning. In this sense, metaphors support what is often described as reflection-for-action, where familiar conceptual frames are used to simulate possible futures. By surfacing these metaphorical patterns, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of how teachers conceptualise their work and offers a foundation for professional dialogue and development in technology education. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1493904 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1493904 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 StartPage: 16 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Figurative Language Type: general – SubjectFull: Reflection Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Compulsory Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Experience Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 4 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 5 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 6 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 7 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 8 Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade 9 Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive Structures Type: general – SubjectFull: Sweden Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Way Technology Teachers Think: The Role of Metaphor and Reflection for Technology Education Practice Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Andreas Larsson IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1360-1431 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2040-8633 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 30 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Design and Technology Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |