Flipping a Simulation before Instruction Can Improve Students' Learning, Interest and Perceived Competence
Saved in:
| Title: | Flipping a Simulation before Instruction Can Improve Students' Learning, Interest and Perceived Competence |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Marci S. DeCaro (ORCID |
| Source: | British Journal of Educational Psychology. 2026 96(1):172-192. |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 21 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) |
| Contract Number: | 2012342 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Simulation, Science Instruction, Teaching Methods, Science Activities, Learning Activities, Instructional Effectiveness, Undergraduate Students, Chemistry, Scores, Student Interests, Self Efficacy, Learner Engagement |
| DOI: | 10.1111/bjep.70007 |
| ISSN: | 0007-0998 2044-8279 |
| Abstract: | Background: Using simulations in science instruction can help make abstract topics more concrete and boost students' understanding. Aims: The current research examined whether using a simulation as an exploratory learning activity before an accompanying lecture has additional learning and motivational benefits compared to a more common lecture-then-simulation approach. Samples: Participants (Experiment 1, N = 168; Experiment 2, N = 357) were undergraduate students in several sections of a first-year chemistry course. Methods: Students were randomly assigned to explore a simulation on atomic structure either before a lecture (explore-first condition) or after the lecture (instruct-first condition). In Experiment 1, the simulation activity time was limited (15 min) and the activity varied in whether self-explanation ('why') prompts were included. In Experiment 2, the activity time was lengthened (20 min), and only 'why' prompts were used. After the activity and lecture, students completed a survey and posttest. Results: In Experiment 1, students in the explore-first condition scored lower on posttest conceptual knowledge scores and reported lower curiosity compared to students in the instruct-first condition. Scores for basic facts and transfer knowledge, and self-reported situational interest, self-efficacy, and competence, were equal between conditions. No effects of prompt condition were found. In Experiment 2, with longer activity time, the results reversed. Students in the explore-first condition scored equally on basic facts and higher on conceptual knowledge and transfer measures, while also reporting higher curiosity, situational interest, self-efficacy, competence, and cognitive engagement. Conclusion: When properly designed, placing simulations before--rather than after--lecture can deepen learning, motivation, and competence. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Notes: | https://osf.io/8bmfw/?view_only=e1bb6f74889941d3834b52fe3b3eb087 |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1496173 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1496173 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Flipping a Simulation before Instruction Can Improve Students' Learning, Interest and Perceived Competence – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Marci+S%2E+DeCaro%22">Marci S. DeCaro</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6753-0725">0000-0001-6753-0725</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Derek+K%2E+McClellan%22">Derek K. McClellan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ryan+Patrick%22">Ryan Patrick</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Aleeta+M%2E+Powe%22">Aleeta M. Powe</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Danielle+Franco%22">Danielle Franco</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Raymond+J%2E+Chastain%22">Raymond J. Chastain</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Linda+Fuselier%22">Linda Fuselier</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jeffrey+L%2E+Hieb%22">Jeffrey L. Hieb</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22British+Journal+of+Educational+Psychology%22"><i>British Journal of Educational Psychology</i></searchLink>. 2026 96(1):172-192. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 21 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: 2012342 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Simulation%22">Simulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Instruction%22">Science Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Activities%22">Science Activities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Activities%22">Learning Activities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Effectiveness%22">Instructional Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Chemistry%22">Chemistry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scores%22">Scores</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Interests%22">Student Interests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Efficacy%22">Self Efficacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learner+Engagement%22">Learner Engagement</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1111/bjep.70007 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0007-0998<br />2044-8279 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Using simulations in science instruction can help make abstract topics more concrete and boost students' understanding. Aims: The current research examined whether using a simulation as an exploratory learning activity before an accompanying lecture has additional learning and motivational benefits compared to a more common lecture-then-simulation approach. Samples: Participants (Experiment 1, N = 168; Experiment 2, N = 357) were undergraduate students in several sections of a first-year chemistry course. Methods: Students were randomly assigned to explore a simulation on atomic structure either before a lecture (explore-first condition) or after the lecture (instruct-first condition). In Experiment 1, the simulation activity time was limited (15 min) and the activity varied in whether self-explanation ('why') prompts were included. In Experiment 2, the activity time was lengthened (20 min), and only 'why' prompts were used. After the activity and lecture, students completed a survey and posttest. Results: In Experiment 1, students in the explore-first condition scored lower on posttest conceptual knowledge scores and reported lower curiosity compared to students in the instruct-first condition. Scores for basic facts and transfer knowledge, and self-reported situational interest, self-efficacy, and competence, were equal between conditions. No effects of prompt condition were found. In Experiment 2, with longer activity time, the results reversed. Students in the explore-first condition scored equally on basic facts and higher on conceptual knowledge and transfer measures, while also reporting higher curiosity, situational interest, self-efficacy, competence, and cognitive engagement. Conclusion: When properly designed, placing simulations before--rather than after--lecture can deepen learning, motivation, and competence. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Note Label: Notes Group: Note Data: https://osf.io/8bmfw/?view_only=e1bb6f74889941d3834b52fe3b3eb087 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1496173 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1496173 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/bjep.70007 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 21 StartPage: 172 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Simulation Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Activities Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Activities Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Chemistry Type: general – SubjectFull: Scores Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Interests Type: general – SubjectFull: Self Efficacy Type: general – SubjectFull: Learner Engagement Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Flipping a Simulation before Instruction Can Improve Students' Learning, Interest and Perceived Competence Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Marci S. DeCaro – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Derek K. McClellan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ryan Patrick – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Aleeta M. Powe – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Danielle Franco – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Raymond J. Chastain – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Linda Fuselier – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jeffrey L. Hieb IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 03 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0007-0998 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2044-8279 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 96 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: British Journal of Educational Psychology Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |