ChatGPT's and Humans' Written Corrective Feedback in EFL/ESL Writing: A Systematic Review

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: ChatGPT's and Humans' Written Corrective Feedback in EFL/ESL Writing: A Systematic Review
Language: English
Authors: Yustinus Calvin Gai Mali (ORCID 0000-0001-9075-783X)
Source: Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. 2026 27(1):31-48.
Availability: Anadolu University. Office of the Rector, Eskisehir, 26470, Turkey. Tel: +90-222-335-34-53; Fax: +90-222-335-34-86; e-mail: rektor@anadolu.edu.tr; e-mail: TOJDE@anadolu.edu.tr; Web site: http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 18
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Information Analyses
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Literature Reviews, Higher Education, Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Computer Uses in Education, English (Second Language), Error Correction
ISSN: 1302-6488
Abstract: Written corrective feedback (WCF) is critical in EFL/ESL writing classrooms. This study aims to review existing research studies on the quality of WCF generated by ChatGPT and humans and to examine how WCF generated by ChatGPT can support WCF that humans give to students' written work in higher education EFL/ESL writing contexts. To meet these goals, the researcher examined 23 studies published in 18 peer-reviewed journals from 2023-2024. The analysis results highlighted potential strengths and weaknesses of WCF generated by ChatGPT and humans. WCF generated by ChatGPT could review various aspects of writing and provide extensive descriptive feedback, yet it sometimes might experience system fatigue that affects the WCF quality. ChatGPT could also provide inaccurate WCF, give WCF that lacked human nuances, and were greatly influenced by how prompts were presented to it. Meanwhile, humans could provide aspects of WCF not accounted for ChatGPT, but their WCF might involve subjective judgment and be unclear. With these findings in mind, the researcher identified three phases of how ChatGPT can work harmoniously with humans to provide quality WCF for students in writing classrooms. Those phases were making various efforts to enhance WCF generated by ChatGPT in students' writing in support of the feedback provided by lecturers, enhancing students' in-depth understanding that not all ChatGPT feedback is accurate, and combining ChatGPT-based WCF, specifically on earlier drafts of students' writing. Pedagogical implications, which highlighted the essence of working synergistically with ChatGPT and mastering prompts to generate the most helpful WCF, for EFL/ESL lecturers in writing classrooms who wish to support their feedback with ChatGPT to provide quality WCF to their students' written work were presented. The researcher then proposed recommendations for future systematic review studies, expanding the research contexts, the scope of reviewed materials, and the research method of the reviewed articles, to address gaps and expand on the insights presented in this study.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1497686
Database: ERIC
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwFeZqsj7TL-LrJEnhqb4dXsAAAA4zCB4AYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHSMIHPAgEAMIHJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDKTaHgZoPKe4x-5TAwIBEICBmxBD6p0xBohIF1gxj0Ph62pqTDmb9z6fIZoK67CubvmwHBPUD3cCFhNXUZP14WbsqgcYeRHNt0NKNH21SjC4fK6NwarmFzTVlzGLPBONoJz8XoPaUcNTCGnXGzK1vc5AIe1sBHyTsiR_WeNIQAQE0xXvJeRjx2E9sr86wH-NFL6XeY9qffZb2B_vYSRndbgRvhkjsyoYgIvNkxrC
Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1497686
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1497686
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: ChatGPT's and Humans' Written Corrective Feedback in EFL/ESL Writing: A Systematic Review
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yustinus+Calvin+Gai+Mali%22">Yustinus Calvin Gai Mali</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9075-783X">0000-0001-9075-783X</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Turkish+Online+Journal+of+Distance+Education%22"><i>Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education</i></searchLink>. 2026 27(1):31-48.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Anadolu University. Office of the Rector, Eskisehir, 26470, Turkey. Tel: +90-222-335-34-53; Fax: +90-222-335-34-86; e-mail: rektor@anadolu.edu.tr; e-mail: TOJDE@anadolu.edu.tr; Web site: http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 18
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Literature+Reviews%22">Literature Reviews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Natural+Language+Processing%22">Natural Language Processing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+%28Composition%29%22">Writing (Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Evaluation%22">Writing Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Uses+in+Education%22">Computer Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22">English (Second Language)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Error+Correction%22">Error Correction</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1302-6488
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Written corrective feedback (WCF) is critical in EFL/ESL writing classrooms. This study aims to review existing research studies on the quality of WCF generated by ChatGPT and humans and to examine how WCF generated by ChatGPT can support WCF that humans give to students' written work in higher education EFL/ESL writing contexts. To meet these goals, the researcher examined 23 studies published in 18 peer-reviewed journals from 2023-2024. The analysis results highlighted potential strengths and weaknesses of WCF generated by ChatGPT and humans. WCF generated by ChatGPT could review various aspects of writing and provide extensive descriptive feedback, yet it sometimes might experience system fatigue that affects the WCF quality. ChatGPT could also provide inaccurate WCF, give WCF that lacked human nuances, and were greatly influenced by how prompts were presented to it. Meanwhile, humans could provide aspects of WCF not accounted for ChatGPT, but their WCF might involve subjective judgment and be unclear. With these findings in mind, the researcher identified three phases of how ChatGPT can work harmoniously with humans to provide quality WCF for students in writing classrooms. Those phases were making various efforts to enhance WCF generated by ChatGPT in students' writing in support of the feedback provided by lecturers, enhancing students' in-depth understanding that not all ChatGPT feedback is accurate, and combining ChatGPT-based WCF, specifically on earlier drafts of students' writing. Pedagogical implications, which highlighted the essence of working synergistically with ChatGPT and mastering prompts to generate the most helpful WCF, for EFL/ESL lecturers in writing classrooms who wish to support their feedback with ChatGPT to provide quality WCF to their students' written work were presented. The researcher then proposed recommendations for future systematic review studies, expanding the research contexts, the scope of reviewed materials, and the research method of the reviewed articles, to address gaps and expand on the insights presented in this study.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1497686
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1497686
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 18
        StartPage: 31
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Literature Reviews
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Higher Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Natural Language Processing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing (Composition)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer Uses in Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: English (Second Language)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Error Correction
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: ChatGPT's and Humans' Written Corrective Feedback in EFL/ESL Writing: A Systematic Review
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Yustinus Calvin Gai Mali
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1302-6488
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 27
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1