To Protect and Preserve? Explaining the Gap between Structural and Superficial Racial Equality Regimes in North Atlantic Rim Universities
Saved in:
| Title: | To Protect and Preserve? Explaining the Gap between Structural and Superficial Racial Equality Regimes in North Atlantic Rim Universities |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | David Roberts (ORCID |
| Source: | British Educational Research Journal. 2026 52(2):952-974. |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 23 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Universities, Governance, Social Justice, Race, Foreign Countries, Employee Attitudes, Racism, Power Structure, Diversity, Models, Human Resources, College Administration, Educational Policy, Equal Education, Reputation, Educational Change, School Personnel, Politics of Education, Financial Support |
| Geographic Terms: | United Kingdom, United States |
| DOI: | 10.1002/berj.70045 |
| ISSN: | 0141-1926 1469-3518 |
| Abstract: | This article examines how UK and US universities manage racial equality regimes through governance structures that prioritise institutional reputation over substantive racial justice reform. Drawing on Bourdieu's field, habitus and capital theory, the study demonstrates how universities neutralise racial justice efforts through bureaucratic inertia, funding control and managerial containment. The analysis is based on qualitative data from 138 university employees across 88 institutions, revealing that racial justice work is systematically depoliticised to align with institutional branding rather than structural transformation. The study introduces the "colour-power matrix," a diagnostic model that maps how power and capital are distributed within universities to maintain racial hierarchies while outwardly promoting diversity. It highlights the role of HR and University Senior Management Teams (USMTs) in shaping racial equality initiatives as non-performative, ensuring they pose no real challenge to institutional structures. Policy recommendations include redistributing decision-making power to subaltern-led governance bodies, reforming HR accountability structures and creating independent racial justice oversight panels. The findings contribute to critical policy studies, decolonial education research and institutional sociology, offering insights into how universities can move beyond symbolic inclusion towards genuine structural change in racial justice work. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1502837 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1502837 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: To Protect and Preserve? Explaining the Gap between Structural and Superficial Racial Equality Regimes in North Atlantic Rim Universities – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22David+Roberts%22">David Roberts</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1891-1262">0000-0002-1891-1262</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22British+Educational+Research+Journal%22"><i>British Educational Research Journal</i></searchLink>. 2026 52(2):952-974. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 23 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Universities%22">Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Governance%22">Governance</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Justice%22">Social Justice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Race%22">Race</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employee+Attitudes%22">Employee Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racism%22">Racism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Power+Structure%22">Power Structure</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Diversity%22">Diversity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Human+Resources%22">Human Resources</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Administration%22">College Administration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Equal+Education%22">Equal Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reputation%22">Reputation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Change%22">Educational Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Personnel%22">School Personnel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Politics+of+Education%22">Politics of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Financial+Support%22">Financial Support</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+States%22">United States</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1002/berj.70045 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0141-1926<br />1469-3518 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This article examines how UK and US universities manage racial equality regimes through governance structures that prioritise institutional reputation over substantive racial justice reform. Drawing on Bourdieu's field, habitus and capital theory, the study demonstrates how universities neutralise racial justice efforts through bureaucratic inertia, funding control and managerial containment. The analysis is based on qualitative data from 138 university employees across 88 institutions, revealing that racial justice work is systematically depoliticised to align with institutional branding rather than structural transformation. The study introduces the "colour-power matrix," a diagnostic model that maps how power and capital are distributed within universities to maintain racial hierarchies while outwardly promoting diversity. It highlights the role of HR and University Senior Management Teams (USMTs) in shaping racial equality initiatives as non-performative, ensuring they pose no real challenge to institutional structures. Policy recommendations include redistributing decision-making power to subaltern-led governance bodies, reforming HR accountability structures and creating independent racial justice oversight panels. The findings contribute to critical policy studies, decolonial education research and institutional sociology, offering insights into how universities can move beyond symbolic inclusion towards genuine structural change in racial justice work. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1502837 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1502837 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/berj.70045 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 23 StartPage: 952 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Universities Type: general – SubjectFull: Governance Type: general – SubjectFull: Social Justice Type: general – SubjectFull: Race Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Employee Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Racism Type: general – SubjectFull: Power Structure Type: general – SubjectFull: Diversity Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Human Resources Type: general – SubjectFull: College Administration Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Equal Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Reputation Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Change Type: general – SubjectFull: School Personnel Type: general – SubjectFull: Politics of Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Financial Support Type: general – SubjectFull: United Kingdom Type: general – SubjectFull: United States Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: To Protect and Preserve? Explaining the Gap between Structural and Superficial Racial Equality Regimes in North Atlantic Rim Universities Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: David Roberts IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0141-1926 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1469-3518 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 52 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: British Educational Research Journal Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |