Subjective Well-Being and Domain-Specific Satisfaction

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Subjective Well-Being and Domain-Specific Satisfaction
Language: English
Authors: Chang-ming Hsieh (ORCID 0000-0002-5737-5757)
Source: Field Methods. 2026 38(2):115-133.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 19
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Well Being, Satisfaction, Life Satisfaction, Mathematics
Assessment and Survey Identifiers: Panel Study of Income Dynamics, Satisfaction With Life Scale
DOI: 10.1177/1525822X261427209
ISSN: 1525-822X
1552-3969
Abstract: The debate on the need to consider the relative importance of various life domains (such as health and finances) in linking domain-specific satisfaction to subjective well-being (SWB), often known as domain importance weighting, has been ongoing. One major issue facing researchers who study domain importance weighting in the context of SWB is that there is no consensus on the weighting function of domain importance. Without clear a priori knowledge of the weighting function of domain importance, assessing the appropriateness of domain importance weighting in the SWB literature has been limited. This article investigates domain importance weighting in the context of SWB without assuming any specific weighting function of domain importance.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1502851
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1502851
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Subjective Well-Being and Domain-Specific Satisfaction
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chang-ming+Hsieh%22">Chang-ming Hsieh</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5737-5757">0000-0002-5737-5757</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Field+Methods%22"><i>Field Methods</i></searchLink>. 2026 38(2):115-133.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 19
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Well+Being%22">Well Being</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Satisfaction%22">Satisfaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Life+Satisfaction%22">Life Satisfaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics%22">Mathematics</searchLink>
– Name: SubjectThesaurus
  Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Panel+Study+of+Income+Dynamics%22">Panel Study of Income Dynamics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Satisfaction+With+Life+Scale%22">Satisfaction With Life Scale</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1177/1525822X261427209
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1525-822X<br />1552-3969
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The debate on the need to consider the relative importance of various life domains (such as health and finances) in linking domain-specific satisfaction to subjective well-being (SWB), often known as domain importance weighting, has been ongoing. One major issue facing researchers who study domain importance weighting in the context of SWB is that there is no consensus on the weighting function of domain importance. Without clear a priori knowledge of the weighting function of domain importance, assessing the appropriateness of domain importance weighting in the SWB literature has been limited. This article investigates domain importance weighting in the context of SWB without assuming any specific weighting function of domain importance.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1502851
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1502851
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/1525822X261427209
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 115
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Well Being
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Satisfaction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Life Satisfaction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Panel Study of Income Dynamics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Satisfaction With Life Scale
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Subjective Well-Being and Domain-Specific Satisfaction
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chang-ming Hsieh
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 05
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1525-822X
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1552-3969
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 38
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Field Methods
              Type: main
ResultId 1