Engineering Students and Professionals as Co-Learners: Epistemic Practices and Positioning

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Engineering Students and Professionals as Co-Learners: Epistemic Practices and Positioning
Language: English
Authors: Michael T. O'Connell (ORCID 0000-0001-9695-0315), Tom Adawi (ORCID 0000-0002-4135-8784), Patric Wallin (ORCID 0000-0001-6222-8543), Christian Stöhr (ORCID 0000-0002-0001-5873)
Source: European Journal of Engineering Education. 2026 51(2):460-478.
Availability: Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 19
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Postsecondary Education
Higher Education
Adult Education
Descriptors: Postsecondary Education, Engineering Education, College Students, Engineering, Technical Occupations, Courses, Continuing Education, Group Dynamics, Interdisciplinary Approach, Epistemology, Learning Strategies, Student Experience
DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2025.2566697
ISSN: 0304-3797
1469-5898
Abstract: A significant turning point in the discourse on interdisciplinarity is marked by the growing interest in non-disciplinary perspectives. This paper explores the potential of a model for engineering education where students and non-academic stakeholders are co-learners in project-based learning. The context is an interdisciplinary project-based course on battery technology open to both engineering students and engineering professionals. Interviews were used to explore what epistemic practices groups of students and professionals mobilise, and how they position each other and the project. A key finding is that students and professionals were positioned in complementary ways, with the latter perceived as valuable sources of industrial knowledge and the former as sources of academic knowledge. Additionally, group composition was found to have an effect on their epistemic practices. Based on our findings, we discuss three models for involving non-academic actors in engineering education.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1503127
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1503127
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Engineering Students and Professionals as Co-Learners: Epistemic Practices and Positioning
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Michael+T%2E+O'Connell%22">Michael T. O'Connell</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9695-0315">0000-0001-9695-0315</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tom+Adawi%22">Tom Adawi</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4135-8784">0000-0002-4135-8784</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Patric+Wallin%22">Patric Wallin</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6222-8543">0000-0001-6222-8543</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Christian+Stöhr%22">Christian Stöhr</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-5873">0000-0002-0001-5873</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22European+Journal+of+Engineering+Education%22"><i>European Journal of Engineering Education</i></searchLink>. 2026 51(2):460-478.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 19
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Adult+Education%22">Adult Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+Education%22">Engineering Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering%22">Engineering</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technical+Occupations%22">Technical Occupations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Courses%22">Courses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Continuing+Education%22">Continuing Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+Dynamics%22">Group Dynamics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interdisciplinary+Approach%22">Interdisciplinary Approach</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Epistemology%22">Epistemology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Strategies%22">Learning Strategies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Experience%22">Student Experience</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1080/03043797.2025.2566697
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0304-3797<br />1469-5898
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: A significant turning point in the discourse on interdisciplinarity is marked by the growing interest in non-disciplinary perspectives. This paper explores the potential of a model for engineering education where students and non-academic stakeholders are co-learners in project-based learning. The context is an interdisciplinary project-based course on battery technology open to both engineering students and engineering professionals. Interviews were used to explore what epistemic practices groups of students and professionals mobilise, and how they position each other and the project. A key finding is that students and professionals were positioned in complementary ways, with the latter perceived as valuable sources of industrial knowledge and the former as sources of academic knowledge. Additionally, group composition was found to have an effect on their epistemic practices. Based on our findings, we discuss three models for involving non-academic actors in engineering education.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1503127
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1503127
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/03043797.2025.2566697
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 460
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Postsecondary Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Engineering Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Engineering
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technical Occupations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Courses
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Continuing Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Group Dynamics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interdisciplinary Approach
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Epistemology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning Strategies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Experience
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Engineering Students and Professionals as Co-Learners: Epistemic Practices and Positioning
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Michael T. O'Connell
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tom Adawi
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Patric Wallin
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Christian Stöhr
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0304-3797
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1469-5898
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 51
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: European Journal of Engineering Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1