The Factorial Validity and Measurement Invariance of the 7Cs of Positive Youth Development among Emerging Adults in Southeast Asia

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Factorial Validity and Measurement Invariance of the 7Cs of Positive Youth Development among Emerging Adults in Southeast Asia
Language: English
Authors: Jet Uy Buenconsejo (ORCID 0000-0003-3777-8601), Laura Ferrer-Wreder, Nor Ba'yah Abdul Kadir, Steven Krauss, Yue Yu, John Jamir Benzon Aruta, Angela Oktavia Suryani, Priyoth Kittiteerasack, Radosveta Dimitrova
Source: Developmental Psychology. 2026 62(1):176-189.
Availability: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Models, Validity, Measurement, Young Adults, Foreign Countries, Gender Differences, Age Differences, COVID-19, Pandemics, Anxiety, Social Behavior, Individual Development, Educational Attainment
Geographic Terms: Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand
DOI: 10.1037/dev0001956
ISSN: 0012-1649
1939-0599
Abstract: Positive youth development (PYD) has gained considerable traction among developmental scientists, but past studies were generally conducted among youth samples from Minority World countries. This study investigated the factorial validity of the newly developed 7Cs model of PYD (competence, confidence, connection, character, caring, contribution, and creativity). Specifically, we compared four measurement models (one-factor, seven-factor, higher order, and bifactor) among emerging adults living in five Southeast Asian countries. The study also aimed to establish evidence of measurement invariance across gender, age, education, and country of origin. Criterion-related validity was also sought using COVID-19 socially responsive behaviors and anxiety. Controlling for the influence of gender, age, and education, sample-level comparisons were also performed on the 7Cs. Data came from 1,888 emerging adults (M[subscript age] = 24.10; SD[subscript age] = 6.89) from Indonesia (n = 253), Malaysia (n = 289), the Philippines (n = 496), Singapore (n = 306), and Thailand (n = 544) during the pandemic. The results supported the superiority of the seven-factor model, which exhibited strict invariance across gender, age, and education and partial scalar invariance across country of origin. The 7Cs exhibited mixed associations with the pandemic-related measures. Significant differences were found in the 7Cs across the five countries. The study provides additional evidence on the theoretical validity of the 7Cs model among youth from understudied settings, while also highlighting avenues for refining current PYD measures.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1503145
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Positive youth development (PYD) has gained considerable traction among developmental scientists, but past studies were generally conducted among youth samples from Minority World countries. This study investigated the factorial validity of the newly developed 7Cs model of PYD (competence, confidence, connection, character, caring, contribution, and creativity). Specifically, we compared four measurement models (one-factor, seven-factor, higher order, and bifactor) among emerging adults living in five Southeast Asian countries. The study also aimed to establish evidence of measurement invariance across gender, age, education, and country of origin. Criterion-related validity was also sought using COVID-19 socially responsive behaviors and anxiety. Controlling for the influence of gender, age, and education, sample-level comparisons were also performed on the 7Cs. Data came from 1,888 emerging adults (M[subscript age] = 24.10; SD[subscript age] = 6.89) from Indonesia (n = 253), Malaysia (n = 289), the Philippines (n = 496), Singapore (n = 306), and Thailand (n = 544) during the pandemic. The results supported the superiority of the seven-factor model, which exhibited strict invariance across gender, age, and education and partial scalar invariance across country of origin. The 7Cs exhibited mixed associations with the pandemic-related measures. Significant differences were found in the 7Cs across the five countries. The study provides additional evidence on the theoretical validity of the 7Cs model among youth from understudied settings, while also highlighting avenues for refining current PYD measures.
ISSN:0012-1649
1939-0599
DOI:10.1037/dev0001956