Framing Agency Predicts Design Self-Efficacy and Engineering Identity, Contributing to Persistence Intentions in and beyond the Engineering Degree
Saved in:
| Title: | Framing Agency Predicts Design Self-Efficacy and Engineering Identity, Contributing to Persistence Intentions in and beyond the Engineering Degree |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, Vanessa Svihla (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Engineering Education. 2026 115(2). |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 41 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Science Foundation (NSF) |
| Contract Number: | 1751369 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Engineering Education, Design, College Freshmen, Predictor Variables, Self Efficacy, Self Concept, Academic Persistence, Intention, College Seniors, Racial Differences, Gender Differences, Problem Solving, Skill Development |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jee.70065 |
| ISSN: | 1069-4730 2168-9830 |
| Abstract: | Background: Commitment to degree and career are commonly connected to developing identity in the discipline and feelings of confidence (self-efficacy) about disciplinary practices. While these psychosocial factors are well studied in engineering, they are less often linked to specific learning experiences. In design education, such experiences include framing agency--the ability to use one's agency to frame design problems. Purpose: We extend typical models of persistence intentions to examine the effects of engaging in design problem framing. We conjectured that framing agency relates to engineering identity and engineering design self-efficacy. We sought to answer the following research questions: To what extent do framing agency constructs predict first-year and senior students' design self-efficacy, engineering identity, and persistence intentions? Does this vary for students from privileged and minoritized genders or from privileged and minoritized racial/ethnic groups? Methods: We used a previously tested survey to measure framing agency, engineering identity, engineering design self-efficacy, persistence intentions, and demographics. We employed structural equation modeling on a national sample (n = 636 first-year students; n = 355 seniors). Results: Overall, engineering identity predicted persistence intentions for all students, but design self-efficacy did not. Specific framing agency constructs, especially individual consequentiality, explained variance in self-efficacy and identity across models. For women/non-binary students, shared consequentiality predicted engineering identity and design self-efficacy. For students from minoritized racial/ethnic groups, learning as consequentiality and individual consequentiality predicted career persistence intentions. Conclusions: Providing students with multiple opportunities to develop design problem framing skills may play a role in broadening participation. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1504273 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1504273 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Framing Agency Predicts Design Self-Efficacy and Engineering Identity, Contributing to Persistence Intentions in and beyond the Engineering Degree – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Madalyn+Wilson-Fetrow%22">Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vanessa+Svihla%22">Vanessa Svihla</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4342-6178">0000-0003-4342-6178</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ruben+Lopez-Parra%22">Ruben Lopez-Parra</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yu-Yu+Hsiao%22">Yu-Yu Hsiao</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Engineering+Education%22"><i>Journal of Engineering Education</i></searchLink>. 2026 115(2). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 41 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: National Science Foundation (NSF) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: 1751369 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+Education%22">Engineering Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Design%22">Design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Freshmen%22">College Freshmen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Predictor+Variables%22">Predictor Variables</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Efficacy%22">Self Efficacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Concept%22">Self Concept</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Persistence%22">Academic Persistence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intention%22">Intention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Seniors%22">College Seniors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racial+Differences%22">Racial Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gender+Differences%22">Gender Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+Solving%22">Problem Solving</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Skill+Development%22">Skill Development</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1002/jee.70065 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1069-4730<br />2168-9830 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Commitment to degree and career are commonly connected to developing identity in the discipline and feelings of confidence (self-efficacy) about disciplinary practices. While these psychosocial factors are well studied in engineering, they are less often linked to specific learning experiences. In design education, such experiences include framing agency--the ability to use one's agency to frame design problems. Purpose: We extend typical models of persistence intentions to examine the effects of engaging in design problem framing. We conjectured that framing agency relates to engineering identity and engineering design self-efficacy. We sought to answer the following research questions: To what extent do framing agency constructs predict first-year and senior students' design self-efficacy, engineering identity, and persistence intentions? Does this vary for students from privileged and minoritized genders or from privileged and minoritized racial/ethnic groups? Methods: We used a previously tested survey to measure framing agency, engineering identity, engineering design self-efficacy, persistence intentions, and demographics. We employed structural equation modeling on a national sample (n = 636 first-year students; n = 355 seniors). Results: Overall, engineering identity predicted persistence intentions for all students, but design self-efficacy did not. Specific framing agency constructs, especially individual consequentiality, explained variance in self-efficacy and identity across models. For women/non-binary students, shared consequentiality predicted engineering identity and design self-efficacy. For students from minoritized racial/ethnic groups, learning as consequentiality and individual consequentiality predicted career persistence intentions. Conclusions: Providing students with multiple opportunities to develop design problem framing skills may play a role in broadening participation. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1504273 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1504273 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/jee.70065 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 41 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Engineering Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Design Type: general – SubjectFull: College Freshmen Type: general – SubjectFull: Predictor Variables Type: general – SubjectFull: Self Efficacy Type: general – SubjectFull: Self Concept Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Persistence Type: general – SubjectFull: Intention Type: general – SubjectFull: College Seniors Type: general – SubjectFull: Racial Differences Type: general – SubjectFull: Gender Differences Type: general – SubjectFull: Problem Solving Type: general – SubjectFull: Skill Development Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Framing Agency Predicts Design Self-Efficacy and Engineering Identity, Contributing to Persistence Intentions in and beyond the Engineering Degree Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Vanessa Svihla – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ruben Lopez-Parra – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yu-Yu Hsiao IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1069-4730 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2168-9830 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 115 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Engineering Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |