'I Don't Have White Privilege, but I Definitely Do Have a Latino Privilege': How Latinas Negotiate Racial Identity and Navigate Hegemonic Ideologies in Engineering
Saved in:
| Title: | 'I Don't Have White Privilege, but I Definitely Do Have a Latino Privilege': How Latinas Negotiate Racial Identity and Navigate Hegemonic Ideologies in Engineering |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Summer Blanco (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Engineering Education. 2026 115(2). |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 29 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Latin Americans, Females, Engineering Education, Racial Identification, Racism, Race, Self Concept, Consciousness Raising, Biological Influences, Parent Background, Longitudinal Studies, Language Role, Physical Characteristics, Secondary School Students |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jee.70060 |
| ISSN: | 1069-4730 2168-9830 |
| Abstract: | Background: The complexities of Latino/a/e/x racial identity remain underexplored in the context of engineering education. Here, we examine the experiences of five Latinas with engineering aspirations, focusing on how they understand their racialized identities and racial inequity in STEM. Purpose: To attend to the within-group heterogeneity in the Latino/a/e/x population in engineering and examine how this diversity shapes sensemaking about race and racial inequity. We leverage a longitudinal dataset to gain insight into what factors impact participants' critical consciousness over time. Method: Grounded in Critical Race Theory, we performed a secondary thematic analysis of 3 years of interviews with five Latinas with engineering aspirations. Drawing on Bonilla Silva's Tri-Racial hierarchy and Freire's Critical Consciousness frameworks, we explored how Latinos/as/es/xs' positioning in the US racial hierarchy supports or hinders their critical consciousness development. Results: Participants' skin color, language, and parents' country of origin were salient aspects of how they understood their racial identity, which positioned them as either White, racially ambiguous, or brown. This shaped their experiences in engineering spaces, engagement with hegemonic STEM narratives, and perceptions of racial inequities. We found that the COVID-19 pandemic and systemic racism in 2020 prompted an important shift in their critical consciousness development. Conclusions: Our findings have implications for research and practice. Researchers should consider (i) employing critical and intersectional frameworks to historicize and contextualize Latino/a/e/x racial identity and dispel the "myth of the monolith", and (ii) developing interventions that disrupt color-evasive rhetoric/practices and support the critical consciousness raising of STEM faculty and students. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1504535 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| Abstract: | Background: The complexities of Latino/a/e/x racial identity remain underexplored in the context of engineering education. Here, we examine the experiences of five Latinas with engineering aspirations, focusing on how they understand their racialized identities and racial inequity in STEM. Purpose: To attend to the within-group heterogeneity in the Latino/a/e/x population in engineering and examine how this diversity shapes sensemaking about race and racial inequity. We leverage a longitudinal dataset to gain insight into what factors impact participants' critical consciousness over time. Method: Grounded in Critical Race Theory, we performed a secondary thematic analysis of 3 years of interviews with five Latinas with engineering aspirations. Drawing on Bonilla Silva's Tri-Racial hierarchy and Freire's Critical Consciousness frameworks, we explored how Latinos/as/es/xs' positioning in the US racial hierarchy supports or hinders their critical consciousness development. Results: Participants' skin color, language, and parents' country of origin were salient aspects of how they understood their racial identity, which positioned them as either White, racially ambiguous, or brown. This shaped their experiences in engineering spaces, engagement with hegemonic STEM narratives, and perceptions of racial inequities. We found that the COVID-19 pandemic and systemic racism in 2020 prompted an important shift in their critical consciousness development. Conclusions: Our findings have implications for research and practice. Researchers should consider (i) employing critical and intersectional frameworks to historicize and contextualize Latino/a/e/x racial identity and dispel the "myth of the monolith", and (ii) developing interventions that disrupt color-evasive rhetoric/practices and support the critical consciousness raising of STEM faculty and students. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1069-4730 2168-9830 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/jee.70060 |
