The Influence of AI on the Traditional Research Paper: Using Normalization Process Theory as a Framework for Ensuring Human Participation
Saved in:
| Title: | The Influence of AI on the Traditional Research Paper: Using Normalization Process Theory as a Framework for Ensuring Human Participation |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Lori B. Doyle, Jill L. Swisher |
| Source: | Thresholds in Education. 2026 49(1):78-94. |
| Availability: | Academy for Educational Studies. 2419 Berkeley Street, Springfield, MO 65804. Tel: 417-299-1560; e-mail: cqieeditors@gmail.com; Web site: http://academyforeducationalstudies.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 17 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Influence of Technology, Technology Uses in Education, Artificial Intelligence, Research Papers (Students), College Students, Grounded Theory, Research Skills, Writing Skills, Theory Practice Relationship, Learning Objectives, Assignments, Documentation, Reflection, Collaborative Writing, Creativity, Public Speaking |
| ISSN: | 0196-9641 2381-5485 |
| Abstract: | With the introduction of generative artificial intelligence (AI), the traditional research paper, as a standalone assessment measure, can no longer be trusted as the best or primary method for assessing whether students are meeting learning objectives. Educators are in the throes of rewriting, explaining, and upholding academic integrity policies while balancing the pros and cons associated with the realities of AI. The ease at which students can produce a generated paper on just about any topic must be considered at the onset and assignments should be developed with consideration regarding the level of AI susceptibility. Utilizing Normalization Process Theory (NPT) as an ecological process based on a grounded theory-to-practice methodology, the authors suggest alternative approaches to the research paper to ensure human participation in the learning process. The traditional research paper was deconstructed to determine skills, benefits, and goals of higher education assessment prior to reconstructing the process with the current AI reality in mind. The topic of AI permeation in education will continue to be an area for future research and the authors suggest some pathways for continuing the conversation along theoretical as well as practical avenues. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1504624 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1504624 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1504624 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Influence of AI on the Traditional Research Paper: Using Normalization Process Theory as a Framework for Ensuring Human Participation – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lori+B%2E+Doyle%22">Lori B. Doyle</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jill+L%2E+Swisher%22">Jill L. Swisher</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Thresholds+in+Education%22"><i>Thresholds in Education</i></searchLink>. 2026 49(1):78-94. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Academy for Educational Studies. 2419 Berkeley Street, Springfield, MO 65804. Tel: 417-299-1560; e-mail: cqieeditors@gmail.com; Web site: http://academyforeducationalstudies.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 17 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Influence+of+Technology%22">Influence of Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Papers+%28Students%29%22">Research Papers (Students)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grounded+Theory%22">Grounded Theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Skills%22">Research Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Skills%22">Writing Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theory+Practice+Relationship%22">Theory Practice Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Objectives%22">Learning Objectives</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Assignments%22">Assignments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Documentation%22">Documentation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reflection%22">Reflection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Collaborative+Writing%22">Collaborative Writing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Creativity%22">Creativity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Speaking%22">Public Speaking</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0196-9641<br />2381-5485 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: With the introduction of generative artificial intelligence (AI), the traditional research paper, as a standalone assessment measure, can no longer be trusted as the best or primary method for assessing whether students are meeting learning objectives. Educators are in the throes of rewriting, explaining, and upholding academic integrity policies while balancing the pros and cons associated with the realities of AI. The ease at which students can produce a generated paper on just about any topic must be considered at the onset and assignments should be developed with consideration regarding the level of AI susceptibility. Utilizing Normalization Process Theory (NPT) as an ecological process based on a grounded theory-to-practice methodology, the authors suggest alternative approaches to the research paper to ensure human participation in the learning process. The traditional research paper was deconstructed to determine skills, benefits, and goals of higher education assessment prior to reconstructing the process with the current AI reality in mind. The topic of AI permeation in education will continue to be an area for future research and the authors suggest some pathways for continuing the conversation along theoretical as well as practical avenues. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1504624 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1504624 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 StartPage: 78 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Influence of Technology Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Papers (Students) Type: general – SubjectFull: College Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Grounded Theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Theory Practice Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Objectives Type: general – SubjectFull: Assignments Type: general – SubjectFull: Documentation Type: general – SubjectFull: Reflection Type: general – SubjectFull: Collaborative Writing Type: general – SubjectFull: Creativity Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Speaking Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Influence of AI on the Traditional Research Paper: Using Normalization Process Theory as a Framework for Ensuring Human Participation Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lori B. Doyle – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jill L. Swisher IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0196-9641 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2381-5485 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 49 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Thresholds in Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |