De-Siloing Federal Data Repositories with Care: Toward a Data Integration Ethical Framework

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: De-Siloing Federal Data Repositories with Care: Toward a Data Integration Ethical Framework
Language: English
Authors: John A. Williams III (ORCID 0000-0002-8561-468X), Sonyia C. Richardson, Danielle R. Harrell, Virginia Redwine Johnson, Kala Burrell-Craft
Source: Urban Review: Issues and Ideas in Public Education. 2026 58(1).
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Descriptive
Descriptors: Federal Government, Public Agencies, Archives, Educational Research, Databases, Data, Ethics
DOI: 10.1007/s11256-025-00801-4
ISSN: 0042-0972
1573-1960
Abstract: Historically, the Office of Civil Rights, Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) has served as the largest, publicly available resource documenting comprehensive academic and social outcomes for all U.S. public school students. Despite its widespread use by scholars and policymakers to confront persistent challenges in PK-12 education, key limitations remain, including the politicalization of data to present a colorblind picture of "All Americans". Furthermore, CRDC's rich education data has not been systematically integrated with other national and state datasets, including those related to health, mental health, employment, and juvenile justice, limiting a holistic understanding of students' academic experiences and school discipline outcomes. At a time when publicly available data is being restricted, wrongfully manipulated, or used to violate civil liberties through private firms and AI, communities that rely on the CRDC and other public datasets to pinpoint inequities and solutions require a mechanism to protect and safely integrate data across multiple repositories. This commentary argues for a strategic reframing using a Data Integration Ethical Framework that seeks to prioritize research that continues to disaggregate data, support policy development and programmatic interventions for students most in need and explores the potential of establishing a centralized framework linking national and statewide social, academic, and behavioral data to support populations most at need.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1504726
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1504726
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: De-Siloing Federal Data Repositories with Care: Toward a Data Integration Ethical Framework
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22John+A%2E+Williams+III%22">John A. Williams III</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8561-468X">0000-0002-8561-468X</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sonyia+C%2E+Richardson%22">Sonyia C. Richardson</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Danielle+R%2E+Harrell%22">Danielle R. Harrell</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Virginia+Redwine+Johnson%22">Virginia Redwine Johnson</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kala+Burrell-Craft%22">Kala Burrell-Craft</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Urban+Review%3A+Issues+and+Ideas+in+Public+Education%22"><i>Urban Review: Issues and Ideas in Public Education</i></searchLink>. 2026 58(1).
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Government%22">Federal Government</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Agencies%22">Public Agencies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Archives%22">Archives</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Research%22">Educational Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Databases%22">Databases</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data%22">Data</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s11256-025-00801-4
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0042-0972<br />1573-1960
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Historically, the Office of Civil Rights, Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) has served as the largest, publicly available resource documenting comprehensive academic and social outcomes for all U.S. public school students. Despite its widespread use by scholars and policymakers to confront persistent challenges in PK-12 education, key limitations remain, including the politicalization of data to present a colorblind picture of "All Americans". Furthermore, CRDC's rich education data has not been systematically integrated with other national and state datasets, including those related to health, mental health, employment, and juvenile justice, limiting a holistic understanding of students' academic experiences and school discipline outcomes. At a time when publicly available data is being restricted, wrongfully manipulated, or used to violate civil liberties through private firms and AI, communities that rely on the CRDC and other public datasets to pinpoint inequities and solutions require a mechanism to protect and safely integrate data across multiple repositories. This commentary argues for a strategic reframing using a Data Integration Ethical Framework that seeks to prioritize research that continues to disaggregate data, support policy development and programmatic interventions for students most in need and explores the potential of establishing a centralized framework linking national and statewide social, academic, and behavioral data to support populations most at need.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1504726
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1504726
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11256-025-00801-4
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Federal Government
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public Agencies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Archives
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Databases
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethics
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: De-Siloing Federal Data Repositories with Care: Toward a Data Integration Ethical Framework
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: John A. Williams III
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sonyia C. Richardson
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Danielle R. Harrell
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Virginia Redwine Johnson
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kala Burrell-Craft
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0042-0972
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1573-1960
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 58
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Urban Review: Issues and Ideas in Public Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1