Question Format Is the Best Predictor of Item Discrimination: A Multivariable Analysis
Saved in:
| Title: | Question Format Is the Best Predictor of Item Discrimination: A Multivariable Analysis |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Kirk Hillsley (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education. 2025 26(3). |
| Availability: | American Society for Microbiology. 1752 N Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 202-737-3600; e-mail: journals@asmusa.org; Web site: https://journals.asm.org/journal/jmbe |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 12 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Test Items, Test Format, Biology, Science Tests, Scores, Undergraduate Study, Foreign Countries, Difficulty Level, Item Banks |
| Geographic Terms: | Canada |
| ISSN: | 1935-7877 1935-7885 |
| Abstract: | Item discrimination, the point-biserial correlation between performance on a question and total exam score, was analyzed in relation to question format, difficulty, and Bloom's taxonomy, which are rarely studied together in a joint framework. To estimate their independent contributions in undergraduate biology examinations, simultaneous multivariable linear and logistic models were conducted on an upper year biology item bank (n = 754). Predictors were question format (multiple-choice question [MCQ], short answer [SA], true/false [TF]), difficulty (easy >80%, moderate 60%-80%, hard <60%), and Bloom (recall, understanding, application, analysis). Question format was the strongest independent predictor. Relative to MCQs, SA items showed higher discrimination and greater odds of meeting the ≥0.35 threshold (odds ratio [OR] = 4.18), while TF items were less discriminating (OR = 0.58). Moderate and hard items exceeded easy questions (ORs = 2.75 and 2.45, respectively). For Bloom, higher-order items outperformed recall questions overall; both understanding and analysis items discriminated better than recall items (ORs = 1.4 and 3.56, respectively). A post hoc grouping of moderate difficulty questions showed that SA + higher-order items (0.53) exceeded MCQ + recall items (0.35), with 89% vs 53% of these items, respectively, meeting a discrimination threshold of ≥0.35. In simultaneous models, question format was the strongest independent predictor of item discrimination, moderate difficulty optimized discrimination, and higher-order objectives exceeded recall. These results provide exploratory insights from a single-institution case study and suggest that adding some higher-order short-answer questions of moderate difficulty may represent a pragmatic strategy for improving assessment quality. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1504782 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1504782 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1504782 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Question Format Is the Best Predictor of Item Discrimination: A Multivariable Analysis – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kirk+Hillsley%22">Kirk Hillsley</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2965-132X">0009-0005-2965-132X</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Microbiology+%26+Biology+Education%22"><i>Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 26(3). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: American Society for Microbiology. 1752 N Street NW, Washington, DC 20036. Tel: 202-737-3600; e-mail: journals@asmusa.org; Web site: https://journals.asm.org/journal/jmbe – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 12 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Items%22">Test Items</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Format%22">Test Format</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biology%22">Biology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Tests%22">Science Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scores%22">Scores</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Study%22">Undergraduate Study</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Difficulty+Level%22">Difficulty Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Item+Banks%22">Item Banks</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Canada%22">Canada</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1935-7877<br />1935-7885 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Item discrimination, the point-biserial correlation between performance on a question and total exam score, was analyzed in relation to question format, difficulty, and Bloom's taxonomy, which are rarely studied together in a joint framework. To estimate their independent contributions in undergraduate biology examinations, simultaneous multivariable linear and logistic models were conducted on an upper year biology item bank (n = 754). Predictors were question format (multiple-choice question [MCQ], short answer [SA], true/false [TF]), difficulty (easy >80%, moderate 60%-80%, hard <60%), and Bloom (recall, understanding, application, analysis). Question format was the strongest independent predictor. Relative to MCQs, SA items showed higher discrimination and greater odds of meeting the ≥0.35 threshold (odds ratio [OR] = 4.18), while TF items were less discriminating (OR = 0.58). Moderate and hard items exceeded easy questions (ORs = 2.75 and 2.45, respectively). For Bloom, higher-order items outperformed recall questions overall; both understanding and analysis items discriminated better than recall items (ORs = 1.4 and 3.56, respectively). A post hoc grouping of moderate difficulty questions showed that SA + higher-order items (0.53) exceeded MCQ + recall items (0.35), with 89% vs 53% of these items, respectively, meeting a discrimination threshold of ≥0.35. In simultaneous models, question format was the strongest independent predictor of item discrimination, moderate difficulty optimized discrimination, and higher-order objectives exceeded recall. These results provide exploratory insights from a single-institution case study and suggest that adding some higher-order short-answer questions of moderate difficulty may represent a pragmatic strategy for improving assessment quality. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1504782 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1504782 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 12 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Test Items Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Format Type: general – SubjectFull: Biology Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Scores Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Study Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Difficulty Level Type: general – SubjectFull: Item Banks Type: general – SubjectFull: Canada Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Question Format Is the Best Predictor of Item Discrimination: A Multivariable Analysis Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kirk Hillsley IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1935-7877 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1935-7885 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 26 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |