View in EDS

Mobile Device-Assisted Peer Review in High School Poetry Analysis: The Role of Revision Intensity

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Mobile Device-Assisted Peer Review in High School Poetry Analysis: The Role of Revision Intensity
Language: English
Authors: Ngatmini (ORCID 0000-0003-2216-4017), Suyitno (ORCID 0000-0003-1778-3630), Irfai Fathurohman (ORCID 0000-0003-1062-8611), Sri Suciati (ORCID 0000-0002-6912-4146), Siti Fatimah (ORCID 0000-0002-9092-2177), Onok Yayang Pamungkas (ORCID 0000-0002-7454-1227)
Source: Educational Process: International Journal. Article e2026046 2026 22.
Availability: UNIVERSITEPARK Limited. iTOWER Plaza (No61, 9th floor) Merkez Mh Akar Cd No3, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey 34382. e-mail: editor@edupij.com; Web site: http://www.edupij.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 19
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: High Schools
Secondary Education
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Telecommunications, Handheld Devices, High School Students, Poetry, Revision (Written Composition), Feedback (Response), Program Effectiveness, Foreign Countries
Geographic Terms: Indonesia
ISSN: 2147-0901
2564-8020
Abstract: Background/purpose: This study investigates how peer feedback translates into actual improvements in high school poetry analysis. It aims to connect feedback processes, feedback network structures, and final product quality by integrating process mining, social network analysis (SNA), and outcome modeling. Materials/methods: Thirty-four students (N = 34) from a high school in Semarang participated in two 90-minute sessions following the sequence: briefing -- peer assessment -- revision -- presentation. Process mining (Optimal Matching and Partitioning Around Medoids) was used to identify workflow archetypes, while SNA examined how feedback was distributed across students. Feedback quantity and quality were linked to final task scores using ANCOVA and linear mixed models, and path analysis was used to test whether revision behavior mediated the effect of feedback on product quality. Results: Process mining revealed three workflow archetypes: Presentation-Leap, Linear-Fast, and Iterative-Revision. SNA indicated a sparse but moderately modular feedback network (density = 0.070; modularity = 0.448; Gini = 0.437; reciprocity = 7.7%). ANCOVA/LMM results showed that revision intensity was the strongest predictor of final quality, followed by weighted incoming feedback, whereas betweenness centrality contributed less. Path analysis confirmed that the effect of feedback on final quality was partially mediated by revision behavior. Conclusions: Meaningful revisions serve as a key mechanism linking peer feedback to improved performance in poetry analysis. Teachers are advised to incorporate mandatory revision checkpoints and to distribute feedback opportunities more equitably across students. The study is limited by its small sample size, single-school context, and nonrandom design; future research should employ multi-site or randomized designs and explore long-term learning outcomes to strengthen generalizability.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1505161
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1505161
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1505161
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Mobile Device-Assisted Peer Review in High School Poetry Analysis: The Role of Revision Intensity
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ngatmini%22">Ngatmini</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2216-4017">0000-0003-2216-4017</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Suyitno%22">Suyitno</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1778-3630">0000-0003-1778-3630</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Irfai+Fathurohman%22">Irfai Fathurohman</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1062-8611">0000-0003-1062-8611</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sri+Suciati%22">Sri Suciati</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6912-4146">0000-0002-6912-4146</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Siti+Fatimah%22">Siti Fatimah</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9092-2177">0000-0002-9092-2177</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Onok+Yayang+Pamungkas%22">Onok Yayang Pamungkas</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7454-1227">0000-0002-7454-1227</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Educational+Process%3A+International+Journal%22"><i>Educational Process: International Journal</i></searchLink>. Article e2026046 2026 22.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: UNIVERSITEPARK Limited. iTOWER Plaza (No61, 9th floor) Merkez Mh Akar Cd No3, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey 34382. e-mail: editor@edupij.com; Web site: http://www.edupij.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 19
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Peer+Evaluation%22">Peer Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Telecommunications%22">Telecommunications</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Handheld+Devices%22">Handheld Devices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Students%22">High School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Poetry%22">Poetry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Revision+%28Written+Composition%29%22">Revision (Written Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Indonesia%22">Indonesia</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2147-0901<br />2564-8020
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background/purpose: This study investigates how peer feedback translates into actual improvements in high school poetry analysis. It aims to connect feedback processes, feedback network structures, and final product quality by integrating process mining, social network analysis (SNA), and outcome modeling. Materials/methods: Thirty-four students (N = 34) from a high school in Semarang participated in two 90-minute sessions following the sequence: briefing -- peer assessment -- revision -- presentation. Process mining (Optimal Matching and Partitioning Around Medoids) was used to identify workflow archetypes, while SNA examined how feedback was distributed across students. Feedback quantity and quality were linked to final task scores using ANCOVA and linear mixed models, and path analysis was used to test whether revision behavior mediated the effect of feedback on product quality. Results: Process mining revealed three workflow archetypes: Presentation-Leap, Linear-Fast, and Iterative-Revision. SNA indicated a sparse but moderately modular feedback network (density = 0.070; modularity = 0.448; Gini = 0.437; reciprocity = 7.7%). ANCOVA/LMM results showed that revision intensity was the strongest predictor of final quality, followed by weighted incoming feedback, whereas betweenness centrality contributed less. Path analysis confirmed that the effect of feedback on final quality was partially mediated by revision behavior. Conclusions: Meaningful revisions serve as a key mechanism linking peer feedback to improved performance in poetry analysis. Teachers are advised to incorporate mandatory revision checkpoints and to distribute feedback opportunities more equitably across students. The study is limited by its small sample size, single-school context, and nonrandom design; future research should employ multi-site or randomized designs and explore long-term learning outcomes to strengthen generalizability.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1505161
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1505161
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Peer Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Telecommunications
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Handheld Devices
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: High School Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Poetry
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Revision (Written Composition)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Indonesia
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Mobile Device-Assisted Peer Review in High School Poetry Analysis: The Role of Revision Intensity
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ngatmini
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Suyitno
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Irfai Fathurohman
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sri Suciati
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Siti Fatimah
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Onok Yayang Pamungkas
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 2147-0901
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2564-8020
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 22
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Educational Process: International Journal
              Type: main
ResultId 1