What Gets Measured? A Systematic Review of Assessment Practices in Spelling Intervention Research
Saved in:
| Title: | What Gets Measured? A Systematic Review of Assessment Practices in Spelling Intervention Research |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Brennan W. Chandler (ORCID |
| Source: | Assessment for Effective Intervention. 2026 51(3):153-165. |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 13 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Education |
| Descriptors: | Spelling, Spelling Instruction, Learning Disabilities, Outcome Measures, Achievement Tests, Tests, Student Evaluation, English (Second Language), Students with Disabilities, Oral Reading, Reading Tests, Literacy, Phonological Awareness, Reading Fluency, Emergent Literacy, Elementary School Students |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | Wide Range Achievement Test, Gray Oral Reading Test, Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement, Woodcock Reading Mastery Test, Wechsler Individual Achievement Test, Test of Word Reading Efficiency, Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) |
| DOI: | 10.1177/15345084261427675 |
| ISSN: | 1534-5084 1938-7458 |
| Abstract: | Spelling is a foundational literacy skill that supports both word reading and written expression. For students with or at risk of a learning disability (LD), difficulties in spelling often constrain the fluency and complexity of writing, making effective interventions essential. Yet, the conclusions drawn about intervention efficacy depend heavily on how outcomes are measured. This review synthesizes outcome measurement practices across 59 spelling intervention studies conducted over the past five decades. All outcome measures (n = 233) were coded by type (researcher-developed vs. norm-referenced) and by linguistic level (sublexical, lexical, sentence, discourse) using the Interactive Dynamic Literacy (IDL) framework. Descriptive analyses revealed that nearly four out of five outcomes were lexical, most often researcher-developed lexical-level spelling probes, with comparatively few outcomes at the sentence or discourse levels. Standardized assessments were similarly concentrated at the word level, with the "Wide Range Achievement Test--Spelling" subtest and "Test of Written Spelling" most commonly used. Finally, the pairing of proximal and standardized outcomes was inconsistent, particularly among group designs. Taken together, findings highlight a measurement bottleneck: spelling interventions are evaluated primarily through lexical-level accuracy, offering limited insight into whether gains transfer to the higher-level writing processes for students with or at risk for LD. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1505512 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1505512 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: What Gets Measured? A Systematic Review of Assessment Practices in Spelling Intervention Research – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brennan+W%2E+Chandler%22">Brennan W. Chandler</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3138-6140">0000-0002-3138-6140</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jessica+R%2E+Toste%22">Jessica R. Toste</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6327-0054">0000-0002-6327-0054</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Christina+Novelli%22">Christina Novelli</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7804-0083">0000-0002-7804-0083</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Emily+B%2E+Hardeman%22">Emily B. Hardeman</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4315-4678">0009-0002-4315-4678</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Assessment+for+Effective+Intervention%22"><i>Assessment for Effective Intervention</i></searchLink>. 2026 51(3):153-165. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 13 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Spelling%22">Spelling</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Spelling+Instruction%22">Spelling Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Disabilities%22">Learning Disabilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcome+Measures%22">Outcome Measures</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Achievement+Tests%22">Achievement Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tests%22">Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22">English (Second Language)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Students+with+Disabilities%22">Students with Disabilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Oral+Reading%22">Oral Reading</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Tests%22">Reading Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Literacy%22">Literacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Phonological+Awareness%22">Phonological Awareness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Fluency%22">Reading Fluency</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Emergent+Literacy%22">Emergent Literacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+School+Students%22">Elementary School Students</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Wide+Range+Achievement+Test%22">Wide Range Achievement Test</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Gray+Oral+Reading+Test%22">Gray Oral Reading Test</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Kaufman+Test+of+Educational+Achievement%22">Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Woodcock+Reading+Mastery+Test%22">Woodcock Reading Mastery Test</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Wechsler+Individual+Achievement+Test%22">Wechsler Individual Achievement Test</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Test+of+Word+Reading+Efficiency%22">Test of Word Reading Efficiency</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Dynamic+Indicators+of+Basic+Early+Literacy+Skills+%28DIBELS%29%22">Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS)</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1177/15345084261427675 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1534-5084<br />1938-7458 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Spelling is a foundational literacy skill that supports both word reading and written expression. For students with or at risk of a learning disability (LD), difficulties in spelling often constrain the fluency and complexity of writing, making effective interventions essential. Yet, the conclusions drawn about intervention efficacy depend heavily on how outcomes are measured. This review synthesizes outcome measurement practices across 59 spelling intervention studies conducted over the past five decades. All outcome measures (n = 233) were coded by type (researcher-developed vs. norm-referenced) and by linguistic level (sublexical, lexical, sentence, discourse) using the Interactive Dynamic Literacy (IDL) framework. Descriptive analyses revealed that nearly four out of five outcomes were lexical, most often researcher-developed lexical-level spelling probes, with comparatively few outcomes at the sentence or discourse levels. Standardized assessments were similarly concentrated at the word level, with the "Wide Range Achievement Test--Spelling" subtest and "Test of Written Spelling" most commonly used. Finally, the pairing of proximal and standardized outcomes was inconsistent, particularly among group designs. Taken together, findings highlight a measurement bottleneck: spelling interventions are evaluated primarily through lexical-level accuracy, offering limited insight into whether gains transfer to the higher-level writing processes for students with or at risk for LD. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1505512 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1505512 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/15345084261427675 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 153 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Spelling Type: general – SubjectFull: Spelling Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Disabilities Type: general – SubjectFull: Outcome Measures Type: general – SubjectFull: Achievement Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: English (Second Language) Type: general – SubjectFull: Students with Disabilities Type: general – SubjectFull: Oral Reading Type: general – SubjectFull: Reading Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Literacy Type: general – SubjectFull: Phonological Awareness Type: general – SubjectFull: Reading Fluency Type: general – SubjectFull: Emergent Literacy Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Wide Range Achievement Test Type: general – SubjectFull: Gray Oral Reading Test Type: general – SubjectFull: Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Woodcock Reading Mastery Test Type: general – SubjectFull: Wechsler Individual Achievement Test Type: general – SubjectFull: Test of Word Reading Efficiency Type: general – SubjectFull: Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: What Gets Measured? A Systematic Review of Assessment Practices in Spelling Intervention Research Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Brennan W. Chandler – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jessica R. Toste – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Christina Novelli – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Emily B. Hardeman IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1534-5084 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1938-7458 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 51 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Assessment for Effective Intervention Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |