Affinity and Allyship Groups to Advance Inclusion in Postsecondary Institutions: A Systematic Scoping Review
Saved in:
| Title: | Affinity and Allyship Groups to Advance Inclusion in Postsecondary Institutions: A Systematic Scoping Review |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Emiko J. Muraki (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Diversity in Higher Education. 2025 18(1):S125-S143. |
| Availability: | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 19 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Information Analyses |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | College Environment, Minority Group Students, Minority Group Teachers, Social Support Groups, Gender Identity, LGBTQ People, Disabilities, Race, Ethnicity, Social Bias, Racism, Gender Bias, Immigrants |
| DOI: | 10.1037/dhe0000543 |
| ISSN: | 1938-8926 1938-8934 |
| Abstract: | Postsecondary institutions seeking to foster inclusion for historically excluded and marginalized faculty, staff, and students often aim to create supportive spaces through dialogue around the experiences of one's identity. One approach to create these spaces is through an affinity and allyship (A&A) group model (i.e., groups that offer supportive spaces for members of historically marginalized groups to build solidarity and safety, and for members of dominant groups to learn about allyship, respectively). However, information on A&A groups is spread across diverse literatures, and there is no summary on the development, implementation, and evaluation of these groups. In this systematic scoping review, we summarize research on A&A group purposes, implementation, and outcomes. We searched four databases for A&A group studies. Included articles examined theories, frameworks, and/or implementation and outcomes of A&A groups. The present review includes 48 articles that met the inclusion criteria (affinity group n = 27, allyship group n = 16, both groups n = 5). Affinity groups generally focused on building connections and mutual support among people with a shared identity or experience, whereas allyship groups focused more on learning about and adopting allyship behaviors. These differences in group purpose were reflected in the groups' content and delivery methods. Although most articles in the review conducted an evaluation, and generally reported positive outcomes, more thorough evaluation is needed to determine the efficacy of such groups and the long-term benefits of group participation. We conclude by providing recommendations for practice and implementation of A&A groups in higher education settings. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1506177 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1506177 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Affinity and Allyship Groups to Advance Inclusion in Postsecondary Institutions: A Systematic Scoping Review – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Emiko+J%2E+Muraki%22">Emiko J. Muraki</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9534-6538">0000-0001-9534-6538</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Elaine+J%2E+Atay%22">Elaine J. Atay</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leah+Chadwick%22">Leah Chadwick</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gwen+van+der+Wijk%22">Gwen van der Wijk</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Camille+M%2E+Mori%22">Camille M. Mori</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Adam+T%2E+Murry%22">Adam T. Murry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Deinera+Exner-Cortens%22">Deinera Exner-Cortens</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Diversity+in+Higher+Education%22"><i>Journal of Diversity in Higher Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 18(1):S125-S143. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 19 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Environment%22">College Environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minority+Group+Students%22">Minority Group Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minority+Group+Teachers%22">Minority Group Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Support+Groups%22">Social Support Groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gender+Identity%22">Gender Identity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22LGBTQ+People%22">LGBTQ People</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Disabilities%22">Disabilities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Race%22">Race</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethnicity%22">Ethnicity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Bias%22">Social Bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racism%22">Racism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gender+Bias%22">Gender Bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Immigrants%22">Immigrants</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1037/dhe0000543 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1938-8926<br />1938-8934 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Postsecondary institutions seeking to foster inclusion for historically excluded and marginalized faculty, staff, and students often aim to create supportive spaces through dialogue around the experiences of one's identity. One approach to create these spaces is through an affinity and allyship (A&A) group model (i.e., groups that offer supportive spaces for members of historically marginalized groups to build solidarity and safety, and for members of dominant groups to learn about allyship, respectively). However, information on A&A groups is spread across diverse literatures, and there is no summary on the development, implementation, and evaluation of these groups. In this systematic scoping review, we summarize research on A&A group purposes, implementation, and outcomes. We searched four databases for A&A group studies. Included articles examined theories, frameworks, and/or implementation and outcomes of A&A groups. The present review includes 48 articles that met the inclusion criteria (affinity group n = 27, allyship group n = 16, both groups n = 5). Affinity groups generally focused on building connections and mutual support among people with a shared identity or experience, whereas allyship groups focused more on learning about and adopting allyship behaviors. These differences in group purpose were reflected in the groups' content and delivery methods. Although most articles in the review conducted an evaluation, and generally reported positive outcomes, more thorough evaluation is needed to determine the efficacy of such groups and the long-term benefits of group participation. We conclude by providing recommendations for practice and implementation of A&A groups in higher education settings. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1506177 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1506177 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1037/dhe0000543 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 19 StartPage: S125 Subjects: – SubjectFull: College Environment Type: general – SubjectFull: Minority Group Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Minority Group Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Social Support Groups Type: general – SubjectFull: Gender Identity Type: general – SubjectFull: LGBTQ People Type: general – SubjectFull: Disabilities Type: general – SubjectFull: Race Type: general – SubjectFull: Ethnicity Type: general – SubjectFull: Social Bias Type: general – SubjectFull: Racism Type: general – SubjectFull: Gender Bias Type: general – SubjectFull: Immigrants Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Affinity and Allyship Groups to Advance Inclusion in Postsecondary Institutions: A Systematic Scoping Review Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Emiko J. Muraki – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Elaine J. Atay – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Leah Chadwick – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gwen van der Wijk – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Camille M. Mori – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Adam T. Murry – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Deinera Exner-Cortens IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1938-8926 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1938-8934 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 18 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Diversity in Higher Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |