Chemistry Teachers' Understanding of Reaction Rate Models: Selection, Prerequisite Conditions, and Use
Saved in:
| Title: | Chemistry Teachers' Understanding of Reaction Rate Models: Selection, Prerequisite Conditions, and Use |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Sungki Kim (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Baltic Science Education. 2026 25(1):118-135. |
| Availability: | Scientia Socialis Ltd. 29 K. Donelaicio Street, LT-78115 Siauliai, Republic of Lithuania. e-mail: scientia@scientiasocialis.lt; e-mail: mail.jbse@gmail.com; Web site: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 18 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Science Teachers, Chemistry, Science Instruction, Scientific Concepts, Knowledge Level, Models, Foreign Countries, Secondary School Teachers |
| Geographic Terms: | South Korea |
| ISSN: | 1648-3898 2538-7138 |
| Abstract: | Teachers' understanding of scientific models is essential for supporting meaningful learning of chemical reaction rates. Yet little is known about how teachers coordinate different dimensions of model understanding in this context. This study examined chemistry teachers' epistemic understanding of models related to reaction rates, focusing on model selection, prerequisite conditions, and model use. A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was employed. Open-ended questionnaire items were administered to 52 in-service chemistry teachers, followed by interviews with 10 teachers to elaborate on quantitative trends. The results showed limited understanding across all three dimensions. Many teachers treated the collision model as a literal depiction rather than one representational choice among alternatives. Teachers frequently applied the half-life concept as a universal rule without recognizing assumptions such as constant volume. When interpreting concentration dependence, most relied on simplified textbook patterns rather than using rate laws as representational models grounded in reaction mechanisms. These findings indicate the need for teacher education that explicitly addresses model selection, underlying assumptions, and the functional use of models in reaction-rate instruction. This study contributes a three-dimensional analytical framework for examining teachers' model-based reasoning and provides a foundation for future research and professional development. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1506378 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1506378 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1506378 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Chemistry Teachers' Understanding of Reaction Rate Models: Selection, Prerequisite Conditions, and Use – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sungki+Kim%22">Sungki Kim</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0393-4533">0000-0002-0393-4533</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Myung+Hwa+Kim%22">Myung Hwa Kim</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7254-2886">0000-0001-7254-2886</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Baltic+Science+Education%22"><i>Journal of Baltic Science Education</i></searchLink>. 2026 25(1):118-135. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Scientia Socialis Ltd. 29 K. Donelaicio Street, LT-78115 Siauliai, Republic of Lithuania. e-mail: scientia@scientiasocialis.lt; e-mail: mail.jbse@gmail.com; Web site: http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/jbse/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 18 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Teachers%22">Science Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Chemistry%22">Chemistry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Instruction%22">Science Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+Concepts%22">Scientific Concepts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Knowledge+Level%22">Knowledge Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+School+Teachers%22">Secondary School Teachers</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22South+Korea%22">South Korea</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1648-3898<br />2538-7138 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Teachers' understanding of scientific models is essential for supporting meaningful learning of chemical reaction rates. Yet little is known about how teachers coordinate different dimensions of model understanding in this context. This study examined chemistry teachers' epistemic understanding of models related to reaction rates, focusing on model selection, prerequisite conditions, and model use. A mixed-methods explanatory sequential design was employed. Open-ended questionnaire items were administered to 52 in-service chemistry teachers, followed by interviews with 10 teachers to elaborate on quantitative trends. The results showed limited understanding across all three dimensions. Many teachers treated the collision model as a literal depiction rather than one representational choice among alternatives. Teachers frequently applied the half-life concept as a universal rule without recognizing assumptions such as constant volume. When interpreting concentration dependence, most relied on simplified textbook patterns rather than using rate laws as representational models grounded in reaction mechanisms. These findings indicate the need for teacher education that explicitly addresses model selection, underlying assumptions, and the functional use of models in reaction-rate instruction. This study contributes a three-dimensional analytical framework for examining teachers' model-based reasoning and provides a foundation for future research and professional development. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1506378 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1506378 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 18 StartPage: 118 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Science Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Chemistry Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Scientific Concepts Type: general – SubjectFull: Knowledge Level Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Secondary School Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: South Korea Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Chemistry Teachers' Understanding of Reaction Rate Models: Selection, Prerequisite Conditions, and Use Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sungki Kim – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Myung Hwa Kim IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1648-3898 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2538-7138 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 25 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Baltic Science Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |