View in EDS

Survey Follow-Up in Randomized Trials with Dual Long- and Short-Form Instruments

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Survey Follow-Up in Randomized Trials with Dual Long- and Short-Form Instruments
Language: English
Authors: David Ross Judkins (ORCID 0000-0002-7208-9468)
Source: Evaluation Review. 2026 50(4):643-673.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 31
Publication Date: 2026
Sponsoring Agency: Administration for Children and Families (ACF) (DHHS), Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation (OPRE)
Contract Number: 75ACF121C00095
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Followup Studies, Surveys, Randomized Controlled Trials, Response Rates (Questionnaires)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X261416558
ISSN: 0193-841X
1552-3926
Abstract: Many evaluations of human services programs rely heavily on survey follow-up to collect outcome data from randomized controlled trials. Evidence clearinghouses will give their highest grade of evidence quality to such evaluations if attrition is low. Declining survey response rates, particularly in the control group, are making it more difficult for evaluators to meet this clearinghouse standard. Hendra and Hill (2019) suggested that it might be better to settle for substantially lower response rates, finding that the pursuit of high target response rates adds time and money while reducing nonresponse bias little if at all. This paper reports on a new approach to boosting response rates that allows reluctant respondents to complete a shortened version of the data collection instrument. Although the method is effective at increasing the response rate and costs less than traditional approaches for boosting response rates, this paper suggests that the data collected from reluctant respondents with the new method probably did not substantially reduce nonresponse bias on impacts, a finding broadly consistent with that of Hendra and Hill. On the other hand, the method did find some important differences in the means of some outcomes within the study arms, a finding that is could be important for descriptive surveys.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1506420
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1506420
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Survey Follow-Up in Randomized Trials with Dual Long- and Short-Form Instruments
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22David+Ross+Judkins%22">David Ross Judkins</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7208-9468">0000-0002-7208-9468</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Evaluation+Review%22"><i>Evaluation Review</i></searchLink>. 2026 50(4):643-673.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 31
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: Administration for Children and Families (ACF) (DHHS), Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation (OPRE)
– Name: NumberContract
  Label: Contract Number
  Group: NumCntrct
  Data: 75ACF121C00095
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Followup+Studies%22">Followup Studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Randomized+Controlled+Trials%22">Randomized Controlled Trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Response+Rates+%28Questionnaires%29%22">Response Rates (Questionnaires)</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1177/0193841X261416558
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0193-841X<br />1552-3926
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Many evaluations of human services programs rely heavily on survey follow-up to collect outcome data from randomized controlled trials. Evidence clearinghouses will give their highest grade of evidence quality to such evaluations if attrition is low. Declining survey response rates, particularly in the control group, are making it more difficult for evaluators to meet this clearinghouse standard. Hendra and Hill (2019) suggested that it might be better to settle for substantially lower response rates, finding that the pursuit of high target response rates adds time and money while reducing nonresponse bias little if at all. This paper reports on a new approach to boosting response rates that allows reluctant respondents to complete a shortened version of the data collection instrument. Although the method is effective at increasing the response rate and costs less than traditional approaches for boosting response rates, this paper suggests that the data collected from reluctant respondents with the new method probably did not substantially reduce nonresponse bias on impacts, a finding broadly consistent with that of Hendra and Hill. On the other hand, the method did find some important differences in the means of some outcomes within the study arms, a finding that is could be important for descriptive surveys.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1506420
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1506420
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/0193841X261416558
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 31
        StartPage: 643
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Followup Studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Surveys
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Randomized Controlled Trials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Response Rates (Questionnaires)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Survey Follow-Up in Randomized Trials with Dual Long- and Short-Form Instruments
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: David Ross Judkins
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0193-841X
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1552-3926
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 50
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Evaluation Review
              Type: main
ResultId 1