Human-AI Collaboration for Qualitative Analysis in Participatory Design: Refining the Writing Analytics Tool
Saved in:
| Title: | Human-AI Collaboration for Qualitative Analysis in Participatory Design: Refining the Writing Analytics Tool |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Andrew Potter, Zeinab Serhan, Nishad A. Patne, Püren Öncel, Ishrat Ahm, Tracy Arner, Rezwana Islam, Rod D. Roscoe, Laura A. Allen, Scott A. Crossley, Danielle S. McNamara |
| Source: | Journal of Educational Data Mining. 2026 18(1):113-155. |
| Availability: | International Educational Data Mining. e-mail: jedm.editor@gmail.com; Web site: https://jedm.educationaldatamining.org/index.php/JEDM |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 43 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Institute of Education Sciences (ED) |
| Contract Number: | R305A180261 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Higher Education, Introductory Courses, Writing (Composition), Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation, Artificial Intelligence, Natural Language Processing, Internet, Computer Assisted Instruction, Computer Uses in Education, Feedback (Response) |
| ISSN: | 2157-2100 |
| Abstract: | This study introduces a hybrid human-AI workflow to qualitative data analysis within the participatory design of the Writing Analytics Toolkit (WAT), an open-source platform that provides formative feedback on student writing using natural language processing. The toolkit includes a classroom-facing implementation (WAT Classroom; WAT-C), designed to support instruction, and a researcher-facing implementation (WAT Researcher; WAT-R), designed to support analytic and validation workflows. Nine experienced college writing instructors (with 97 cumulative years of teaching) participated in focus group sessions to evaluate an early prototype of the classroom version of WAT (WAT-C), offering formative input on usability, instructional alignment, and feedback clarity. To analyze the resulting qualitative data, we employed a novel AI-augmented analytic process: GPT-4o, integrated within a secure, retrieval-augmented system, to generate inductive codes and preliminary themes from transcripts. These AI-generated outputs were iteratively reviewed, critiqued, refined, and synthesized by researchers, supporting both analytical scalability and interpretive rigor. This human-AI partnership enabled efficient thematic exploration while preserving methodological transparency and researcher judgment. Findings from both qualitative and complementary survey data identified four key design priorities: (1) clearer, more concise feedback, (2) increased instructor customization, (3) reduced administrative burden, and (4) a simplified user interface. These insights directly informed subsequent revisions to WAT-C, including a redesigned feedback interface, customizable metric targets, learning management system integration, and a more intuitive layout. This work illustrates how large language models (LLMs) can support inductive qualitative analysis within participatory design workflows. Moreover, results demonstrate how this workflow can inform iterative educational technology development. Implications include the need to ensure ethical oversight, researcher-led interpretation, and alignment with instructional priorities when incorporating AI into the design of educational technologies. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| IES Funded: | Yes |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1506627 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1506627 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1506627 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Human-AI Collaboration for Qualitative Analysis in Participatory Design: Refining the Writing Analytics Tool – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andrew+Potter%22">Andrew Potter</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Zeinab+Serhan%22">Zeinab Serhan</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nishad+A%2E+Patne%22">Nishad A. Patne</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Püren+Öncel%22">Püren Öncel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ishrat+Ahm%22">Ishrat Ahm</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tracy+Arner%22">Tracy Arner</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rezwana+Islam%22">Rezwana Islam</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rod+D%2E+Roscoe%22">Rod D. Roscoe</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Laura+A%2E+Allen%22">Laura A. Allen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Scott+A%2E+Crossley%22">Scott A. Crossley</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Danielle+S%2E+McNamara%22">Danielle S. McNamara</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Educational+Data+Mining%22"><i>Journal of Educational Data Mining</i></searchLink>. 2026 18(1):113-155. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: International Educational Data Mining. e-mail: jedm.editor@gmail.com; Web site: https://jedm.educationaldatamining.org/index.php/JEDM – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 43 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Institute of Education Sciences (ED) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: R305A180261 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Introductory+Courses%22">Introductory Courses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+%28Composition%29%22">Writing (Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Instruction%22">Writing Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Evaluation%22">Writing Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Natural+Language+Processing%22">Natural Language Processing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Internet%22">Internet</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Assisted+Instruction%22">Computer Assisted Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Uses+in+Education%22">Computer Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2157-2100 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study introduces a hybrid human-AI workflow to qualitative data analysis within the participatory design of the Writing Analytics Toolkit (WAT), an open-source platform that provides formative feedback on student writing using natural language processing. The toolkit includes a classroom-facing implementation (WAT Classroom; WAT-C), designed to support instruction, and a researcher-facing implementation (WAT Researcher; WAT-R), designed to support analytic and validation workflows. Nine experienced college writing instructors (with 97 cumulative years of teaching) participated in focus group sessions to evaluate an early prototype of the classroom version of WAT (WAT-C), offering formative input on usability, instructional alignment, and feedback clarity. To analyze the resulting qualitative data, we employed a novel AI-augmented analytic process: GPT-4o, integrated within a secure, retrieval-augmented system, to generate inductive codes and preliminary themes from transcripts. These AI-generated outputs were iteratively reviewed, critiqued, refined, and synthesized by researchers, supporting both analytical scalability and interpretive rigor. This human-AI partnership enabled efficient thematic exploration while preserving methodological transparency and researcher judgment. Findings from both qualitative and complementary survey data identified four key design priorities: (1) clearer, more concise feedback, (2) increased instructor customization, (3) reduced administrative burden, and (4) a simplified user interface. These insights directly informed subsequent revisions to WAT-C, including a redesigned feedback interface, customizable metric targets, learning management system integration, and a more intuitive layout. This work illustrates how large language models (LLMs) can support inductive qualitative analysis within participatory design workflows. Moreover, results demonstrate how this workflow can inform iterative educational technology development. Implications include the need to ensure ethical oversight, researcher-led interpretation, and alignment with instructional priorities when incorporating AI into the design of educational technologies. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: CodeSource Label: IES Funded Group: SrcInfo Data: Yes – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1506627 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1506627 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 43 StartPage: 113 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Introductory Courses Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing (Composition) Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Natural Language Processing Type: general – SubjectFull: Internet Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Assisted Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Human-AI Collaboration for Qualitative Analysis in Participatory Design: Refining the Writing Analytics Tool Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Andrew Potter – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Zeinab Serhan – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nishad A. Patne – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Püren Öncel – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ishrat Ahm – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Tracy Arner – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rezwana Islam – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rod D. Roscoe – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Laura A. Allen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Scott A. Crossley – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Danielle S. McNamara IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2157-2100 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 18 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Educational Data Mining Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |