Understanding Student Viewpoints: Sentiment and Thematic Insights from Course Feedback
Saved in:
| Title: | Understanding Student Viewpoints: Sentiment and Thematic Insights from Course Feedback |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Niel Bunda (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn). 2026 20(2):687-699. |
| Availability: | Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. C5 Plumbon, Banguntapan, Yogyakarta, 55198, Indonesia. e-mail: edulearn@uad.ac.id; Web site: http://edulearn.intelektual.org/index.php/EduLearn/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 13 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Student Attitudes, Course Evaluation, Foreign Countries, Engineering Education, Higher Education, Computer Science Education, Undergraduate Students, Feedback (Response) |
| Geographic Terms: | Philippines |
| ISSN: | 2089-9823 2302-9277 |
| Abstract: | This study addresses the challenge of interpreting qualitative student feedback from the course experience surveys (CES). Traditional feedback analysis is labor-intensive and not easily scalable. We combine sentiment and thematic analysis to enhance the depth of qualitative insights, uncovering deeper perspectives in student comments. The obtain, scrub, explore, model, and interpret (OSEMN) framework guided data collection, cleaning, exploration, and modeling. The analysis showed that over 70% of student feedback was positive, reflecting high satisfaction with educational experiences. Key findings included a long-tailed distribution of comment lengths, with shorter comments more prevalent. Interestingly, longer comments showed a weak negative correlation with sentiment scores, indicating that length does not necessarily reflect more positive or negative sentiment. Nuanced feedback patterns emerged; higher counts of positive words sometimes decreased sentiment scores, while negative words correlated positively, suggesting complex sentiment expression. We identified five primary themes, they are: i) educational engagement; ii) classroom dynamics; iii) appreciative learning; iv) educational excellence; and v) instructional effectiveness. The study underscores the value of student feedback in driving educational improvements and offers actionable insights for administrators. It demonstrates the potential of automated analysis to transform qualitative data into strategic enhancements, ultimately improving student outcomes and institutional effectiveness. Future research should examine the long-term impacts of feedback-driven interventions and strategies to increase survey engagement. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1507379 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1507379 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1507379 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Understanding Student Viewpoints: Sentiment and Thematic Insights from Course Feedback – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Niel+Bunda%22">Niel Bunda</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7813-3134">0009-0004-7813-3134</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Eddie+De+Paula%22">Eddie De Paula</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5136-2306">0000-0002-5136-2306</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gisele+Dizon%22">Gisele Dizon</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5411-0147">0009-0001-5411-0147</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Education+and+Learning+%28EduLearn%29%22"><i>Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)</i></searchLink>. 2026 20(2):687-699. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. C5 Plumbon, Banguntapan, Yogyakarta, 55198, Indonesia. e-mail: edulearn@uad.ac.id; Web site: http://edulearn.intelektual.org/index.php/EduLearn/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 13 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Course+Evaluation%22">Course Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+Education%22">Engineering Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Science+Education%22">Computer Science Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Philippines%22">Philippines</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2089-9823<br />2302-9277 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study addresses the challenge of interpreting qualitative student feedback from the course experience surveys (CES). Traditional feedback analysis is labor-intensive and not easily scalable. We combine sentiment and thematic analysis to enhance the depth of qualitative insights, uncovering deeper perspectives in student comments. The obtain, scrub, explore, model, and interpret (OSEMN) framework guided data collection, cleaning, exploration, and modeling. The analysis showed that over 70% of student feedback was positive, reflecting high satisfaction with educational experiences. Key findings included a long-tailed distribution of comment lengths, with shorter comments more prevalent. Interestingly, longer comments showed a weak negative correlation with sentiment scores, indicating that length does not necessarily reflect more positive or negative sentiment. Nuanced feedback patterns emerged; higher counts of positive words sometimes decreased sentiment scores, while negative words correlated positively, suggesting complex sentiment expression. We identified five primary themes, they are: i) educational engagement; ii) classroom dynamics; iii) appreciative learning; iv) educational excellence; and v) instructional effectiveness. The study underscores the value of student feedback in driving educational improvements and offers actionable insights for administrators. It demonstrates the potential of automated analysis to transform qualitative data into strategic enhancements, ultimately improving student outcomes and institutional effectiveness. Future research should examine the long-term impacts of feedback-driven interventions and strategies to increase survey engagement. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1507379 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1507379 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 StartPage: 687 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Course Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Engineering Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Science Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response) Type: general – SubjectFull: Philippines Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Understanding Student Viewpoints: Sentiment and Thematic Insights from Course Feedback Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Niel Bunda – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Eddie De Paula – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gisele Dizon IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 2089-9823 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2302-9277 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 20 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |