Technology-Based Worksheets to Develop Students' Mathematical Argumentation Skills
Saved in:
| Title: | Technology-Based Worksheets to Develop Students' Mathematical Argumentation Skills |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Lia Budi Tristanti, Syarifatul Maf’ulah, M. Bahrul Subkhi |
| Source: | Mathematics Teaching Research Journal. 2025 17(6):248-277. |
| Availability: | City University of New York. Creative Commons. 205 East 42 Street, New York, NY 10017. Web site: https://mtrj.commons.gc.cuny.edu/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 30 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, Worksheets, Mathematics Instruction, Persuasive Discourse, Computer Uses in Education, Preservice Teachers, Mathematics Teachers, Program Effectiveness, Skill Development |
| Geographic Terms: | Indonesia |
| ISSN: | 2573-4377 |
| Abstract: | This study examines the need for and effectiveness of technology-based worksheets in improving students' mathematical argumentation skills. The worksheets were developed based on the Toulmin argumentation model, including mathematical problems, data, claims, warrants, qualifiers, rebuttals, and backing to guide students in constructing logical mathematical arguments. A pretest-posttest design with two unequal experimental groups was used. The population consisted of 200 prospective mathematics teachers in East Java, Indonesia, and 80 students were randomly selected and divided into two groups. Experimental Group 1 used digital-based worksheets, while Experimental Group 2 used printed worksheets. Data were collected through questionnaires and tests. Initial findings showed that although lecturers allowed students to express opinions, debate, and challenge peers' ideas, the worksheets commonly used did not promote structured mathematical argumentation or integrate technology. Therefore, technology-based worksheets were needed. The results showed that the average post-test score of the digital worksheet group (82.88) was significantly higher than that of the printed worksheet group (69.22). Statistical testing (p < 0.05) confirmed a significant difference between the two groups. It can be concluded that digital-based worksheets have a positive and significant effect on students' mathematical argumentation abilities. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1507557 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1507557 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1507557 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Technology-Based Worksheets to Develop Students' Mathematical Argumentation Skills – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lia+Budi+Tristanti%22">Lia Budi Tristanti</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Syarifatul+Maf%27ulah%22">Syarifatul Maf’ulah</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22M%2E+Bahrul+Subkhi%22">M. Bahrul Subkhi</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Mathematics+Teaching+Research+Journal%22"><i>Mathematics Teaching Research Journal</i></searchLink>. 2025 17(6):248-277. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: City University of New York. Creative Commons. 205 East 42 Street, New York, NY 10017. Web site: https://mtrj.commons.gc.cuny.edu/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 30 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Worksheets%22">Worksheets</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Instruction%22">Mathematics Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Persuasive+Discourse%22">Persuasive Discourse</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Uses+in+Education%22">Computer Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preservice+Teachers%22">Preservice Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Teachers%22">Mathematics Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Skill+Development%22">Skill Development</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Indonesia%22">Indonesia</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2573-4377 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study examines the need for and effectiveness of technology-based worksheets in improving students' mathematical argumentation skills. The worksheets were developed based on the Toulmin argumentation model, including mathematical problems, data, claims, warrants, qualifiers, rebuttals, and backing to guide students in constructing logical mathematical arguments. A pretest-posttest design with two unequal experimental groups was used. The population consisted of 200 prospective mathematics teachers in East Java, Indonesia, and 80 students were randomly selected and divided into two groups. Experimental Group 1 used digital-based worksheets, while Experimental Group 2 used printed worksheets. Data were collected through questionnaires and tests. Initial findings showed that although lecturers allowed students to express opinions, debate, and challenge peers' ideas, the worksheets commonly used did not promote structured mathematical argumentation or integrate technology. Therefore, technology-based worksheets were needed. The results showed that the average post-test score of the digital worksheet group (82.88) was significantly higher than that of the printed worksheet group (69.22). Statistical testing (p < 0.05) confirmed a significant difference between the two groups. It can be concluded that digital-based worksheets have a positive and significant effect on students' mathematical argumentation abilities. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1507557 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1507557 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 30 StartPage: 248 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Worksheets Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Persuasive Discourse Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Preservice Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Mathematics Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Skill Development Type: general – SubjectFull: Indonesia Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Technology-Based Worksheets to Develop Students' Mathematical Argumentation Skills Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lia Budi Tristanti – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Syarifatul Maf’ulah – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: M. Bahrul Subkhi IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2573-4377 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 17 – Type: issue Value: 6 Titles: – TitleFull: Mathematics Teaching Research Journal Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |