Combining Non-Interactive Teaching and Drawing Fosters Conceptual Knowledge but Not Monitoring Accuracy from Guided Inquiry in Science Learning

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Combining Non-Interactive Teaching and Drawing Fosters Conceptual Knowledge but Not Monitoring Accuracy from Guided Inquiry in Science Learning
Language: English
Authors: Heike Russ (ORCID 0009-0004-0066-7267), Leonie Sibley (ORCID 0000-0003-2482-5528), Salome Flegr (ORCID 0000-0002-7049-9316), Jochen Kuhn (ORCID 0000-0002-6985-3218), Vincent Hoogerheide (ORCID 0000-0003-4176-0973), Katharina Scheiter (ORCID 0000-0002-9397-7544), Andreas Lachner (ORCID 0000-0001-5866-7164)
Source: Journal of Educational Psychology. 2026 118(3):345-367.
Availability: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 23
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Secondary Education
Elementary Education
Grade 7
Junior High Schools
Middle Schools
Grade 8
Descriptors: Inquiry, Active Learning, Science Instruction, Physics, Secondary School Students, Peer Teaching, Freehand Drawing, Scientific Concepts, Knowledge Level, Metacognition, Foreign Countries, Grade 7, Grade 8, Optics, Outcomes of Education, Instructional Effectiveness
Geographic Terms: Germany
DOI: 10.1037/edu0000971
ISSN: 0022-0663
1939-2176
Abstract: Although inquiry-based learning is a widespread instructional strategy in science education, students often tend to process the contents superficially, which can hamper learning. In this classroom experiment, we investigated whether the generative activity of non-interactive teaching, in which students verbally explain contents to a fictitious, nonpresent peer, can be enhanced by drawing to support students' meaningful learning from guided inquiry. The study was conducted in an authentic physics education context in schools with secondary students (N = 590), contrasting three generative conditions (teaching-only, teaching + provided visualization, teaching + drawing) to a restudy control condition. Their potential effects were examined on immediate and lasting conceptual knowledge and monitoring accuracy, defined as students' metacognitive ability to judge their own performance. Regarding performance on the immediate conceptual knowledge test, generative activities were more effective than restudy. Also, in line with our expectations, the combined visualization conditions (teaching + visualization, teaching + drawing) outperformed teaching-only; moreover, teaching + drawing was more effective than teaching + visualization. The latter finding could be traced back to the fact that creating an additional drawing increased students' task interest and the completeness of their verbal explanations. Regarding monitoring accuracy, no effects were found. Contrary to expectations, there were no significant differences among conditions on lasting (meta-)cognitive learning as assessed 8 weeks after the lesson. The results demonstrate that combining generative activities enhances meaningful inquiry learning and highlights the need to further enhance generative activities to aid lasting learning.
Abstractor: As Provided
Notes: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DQX3A
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1507586
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1507586
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Combining Non-Interactive Teaching and Drawing Fosters Conceptual Knowledge but Not Monitoring Accuracy from Guided Inquiry in Science Learning
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Heike+Russ%22">Heike Russ</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0004-0066-7267">0009-0004-0066-7267</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leonie+Sibley%22">Leonie Sibley</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2482-5528">0000-0003-2482-5528</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Salome+Flegr%22">Salome Flegr</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7049-9316">0000-0002-7049-9316</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jochen+Kuhn%22">Jochen Kuhn</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6985-3218">0000-0002-6985-3218</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Vincent+Hoogerheide%22">Vincent Hoogerheide</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4176-0973">0000-0003-4176-0973</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Katharina+Scheiter%22">Katharina Scheiter</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9397-7544">0000-0002-9397-7544</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andreas+Lachner%22">Andreas Lachner</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5866-7164">0000-0001-5866-7164</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Educational+Psychology%22"><i>Journal of Educational Psychology</i></searchLink>. 2026 118(3):345-367.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 23
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+7%22">Grade 7</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Junior+High+Schools%22">Junior High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+8%22">Grade 8</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inquiry%22">Inquiry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Active+Learning%22">Active Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Instruction%22">Science Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physics%22">Physics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+School+Students%22">Secondary School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Peer+Teaching%22">Peer Teaching</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Freehand+Drawing%22">Freehand Drawing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+Concepts%22">Scientific Concepts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Knowledge+Level%22">Knowledge Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Metacognition%22">Metacognition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+7%22">Grade 7</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+8%22">Grade 8</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Optics%22">Optics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcomes+of+Education%22">Outcomes of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Effectiveness%22">Instructional Effectiveness</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Germany%22">Germany</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1037/edu0000971
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0022-0663<br />1939-2176
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Although inquiry-based learning is a widespread instructional strategy in science education, students often tend to process the contents superficially, which can hamper learning. In this classroom experiment, we investigated whether the generative activity of non-interactive teaching, in which students verbally explain contents to a fictitious, nonpresent peer, can be enhanced by drawing to support students' meaningful learning from guided inquiry. The study was conducted in an authentic physics education context in schools with secondary students (N = 590), contrasting three generative conditions (teaching-only, teaching + provided visualization, teaching + drawing) to a restudy control condition. Their potential effects were examined on immediate and lasting conceptual knowledge and monitoring accuracy, defined as students' metacognitive ability to judge their own performance. Regarding performance on the immediate conceptual knowledge test, generative activities were more effective than restudy. Also, in line with our expectations, the combined visualization conditions (teaching + visualization, teaching + drawing) outperformed teaching-only; moreover, teaching + drawing was more effective than teaching + visualization. The latter finding could be traced back to the fact that creating an additional drawing increased students' task interest and the completeness of their verbal explanations. Regarding monitoring accuracy, no effects were found. Contrary to expectations, there were no significant differences among conditions on lasting (meta-)cognitive learning as assessed 8 weeks after the lesson. The results demonstrate that combining generative activities enhances meaningful inquiry learning and highlights the need to further enhance generative activities to aid lasting learning.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: Note
  Label: Notes
  Group: Note
  Data: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DQX3A
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1507586
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1507586
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1037/edu0000971
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 23
        StartPage: 345
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Inquiry
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Active Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Physics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Secondary School Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Peer Teaching
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Freehand Drawing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scientific Concepts
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Knowledge Level
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Metacognition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grade 7
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grade 8
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Optics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Outcomes of Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Instructional Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Germany
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Combining Non-Interactive Teaching and Drawing Fosters Conceptual Knowledge but Not Monitoring Accuracy from Guided Inquiry in Science Learning
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Heike Russ
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Leonie Sibley
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Salome Flegr
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jochen Kuhn
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Vincent Hoogerheide
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Katharina Scheiter
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Andreas Lachner
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 04
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0022-0663
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1939-2176
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 118
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Educational Psychology
              Type: main
ResultId 1