Teachers as Team Players? Exploring the Relationship between Collaborative Practice, Professional Development, and Work-Related Stress Using Diary Data

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Teachers as Team Players? Exploring the Relationship between Collaborative Practice, Professional Development, and Work-Related Stress Using Diary Data
Language: English
Authors: Beat Rechsteiner (ORCID 0000-0003-2555-431X), Miriam Compagnoni (ORCID 0000-0002-7850-129X), Andrea Wullschleger (ORCID 0000-0003-4390-3835), Urs Grob (ORCID 0000-0002-6671-7085), Flurin Gotsch (ORCID 0009-0003-9102-1359), Katharina Maag Merki (ORCID 0000-0002-0215-1684)
Source: Journal of Professional Capital and Community. 2026 11(2):171-187.
Availability: Emerald Publishing Limited. Howard House, Wagon Lane, Bingley, West Yorkshire, BD16 1WA, UK. Tel: +44-1274-777700; Fax: +44-1274-785201; e-mail: emerald@emeraldinsight.com; Web site: http://www.emerald.com/insight
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 17
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Teacher Collaboration, Faculty Development, Stress Variables, Diaries, Teaching Conditions, Noninstructional Responsibility, Foreign Countries, Teacher Attitudes
Geographic Terms: Switzerland
DOI: 10.1108/JPCC-05-2024-0062
ISSN: 2056-9548
2056-9556
Abstract: Purpose: This study examines teachers' collaborative practice during non-instructional work time. It aims to explore teachers' collaborative practice using diary data, analyze daily and overall relations of collaboration to teachers' professional development (PD) and work-related stress by disentangling between- and within-person effects, and investigate whether these associations are stronger when including only collaborative activities that focus on further developing educational practice. Design/methodology/approach: The study employed an end-of-day experience sampling method to investigate collaborative activities among primary school teachers in 56 schools in the German-speaking part of Switzerland. Data was collected longitudinally over three weeks, with teachers (n = 559) completing daily online logbook entries (n = 7,110). Mixed-effects models were employed for data analysis, exploring between- and within-person effects. Findings: On average, one-third of teachers' non-instructional activities involved collaboration, but day-to-day variability and differences between teachers were high. Further, teachers who collaborated more overall did not report higher benefits of collaboration for PD or stress levels. However, these associations came to the fore on days when teachers collaborated more than usual. Moreover, favorable effects were identified for collaborative activities focused on advancing educational practices. Originality/value: This study provides a differentiated overview of how teacher collaboration is associated with benefits for PD and work-related stress. It indicates that teachers do not perceive collaboration on exclusively organizational and administrative matters as valuable and beneficial for PD.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1507916
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:Purpose: This study examines teachers' collaborative practice during non-instructional work time. It aims to explore teachers' collaborative practice using diary data, analyze daily and overall relations of collaboration to teachers' professional development (PD) and work-related stress by disentangling between- and within-person effects, and investigate whether these associations are stronger when including only collaborative activities that focus on further developing educational practice. Design/methodology/approach: The study employed an end-of-day experience sampling method to investigate collaborative activities among primary school teachers in 56 schools in the German-speaking part of Switzerland. Data was collected longitudinally over three weeks, with teachers (n = 559) completing daily online logbook entries (n = 7,110). Mixed-effects models were employed for data analysis, exploring between- and within-person effects. Findings: On average, one-third of teachers' non-instructional activities involved collaboration, but day-to-day variability and differences between teachers were high. Further, teachers who collaborated more overall did not report higher benefits of collaboration for PD or stress levels. However, these associations came to the fore on days when teachers collaborated more than usual. Moreover, favorable effects were identified for collaborative activities focused on advancing educational practices. Originality/value: This study provides a differentiated overview of how teacher collaboration is associated with benefits for PD and work-related stress. It indicates that teachers do not perceive collaboration on exclusively organizational and administrative matters as valuable and beneficial for PD.
ISSN:2056-9548
2056-9556
DOI:10.1108/JPCC-05-2024-0062