View in EDS

The Penn Electrophysiology of Encoding and Retrieval Study

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Penn Electrophysiology of Encoding and Retrieval Study
Language: English
Authors: Michael J. Kahana (ORCID 0000-0001-8122-9525), Lynn J. Lohnas, M. Karl Healey, Ada Aka, Adam W. Broitman, Patrick Crutchley, Elizabeth Crutchley, Kylie H. Alm, Brandon S. Katerman, Nicole E. Miller, Joel R. Kuhn, Yuxuan Li, Nicole M. Long, Jonathan Miller, Madison D. Paron, Jesse K. Pazdera (ORCID 0000-0002-4913-9236), Isaac Pedisich, Joseph H. Rudoler, Christoph T. Weidemann
Source: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2024 50(9):1421-1443.
Availability: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 23
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Research Projects, Cognitive Processes, Behavior, Physiology, Memory, Brain, Experiments, Individual Differences, Recall (Psychology), Correlation
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001319
ISSN: 0278-7393
1939-1285
Abstract: The Penn Electrophysiology of Encoding and Retrieval Study (PEERS) aimed to characterize the behavioral and electrophysiological (EEG) correlates of memory encoding and retrieval in highly practiced individuals. Across five PEERS experiments, 300+ subjects contributed more than 7,000 memory testing sessions with recorded EEG data. Here we tell the story of PEERS: its genesis, evolution, major findings, and the lessons it taught us about taking a big scientific approach in studying memory and the human brain.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1508003
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:The Penn Electrophysiology of Encoding and Retrieval Study (PEERS) aimed to characterize the behavioral and electrophysiological (EEG) correlates of memory encoding and retrieval in highly practiced individuals. Across five PEERS experiments, 300+ subjects contributed more than 7,000 memory testing sessions with recorded EEG data. Here we tell the story of PEERS: its genesis, evolution, major findings, and the lessons it taught us about taking a big scientific approach in studying memory and the human brain.
ISSN:0278-7393
1939-1285
DOI:10.1037/xlm0001319