Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback: Examination of Feedback Types and Think-Aloud Protocol as Pedagogical Interventions

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback: Examination of Feedback Types and Think-Aloud Protocol as Pedagogical Interventions
Language: English
Authors: Mahmoud Abdi Tabari (ORCID 0000-0002-8022-5415), Masatoshi Sato (ORCID 0000-0001-7111-3406), Yizhou Wang
Source: Language Teaching Research. 2026 30(5):2865-2898.
Availability: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 34
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Protocol Analysis, Intervention, Teaching Methods, Second Language Instruction, Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition), Syntax, Undergraduate Students, English (Second Language), Universities, Written Language, Essays
DOI: 10.1177/13621688231202574
ISSN: 1362-1688
1477-0954
Abstract: This study examined the combined effects of written corrective feedback (WCF) and think-aloud protocols (TAPs) as two types of pedagogical intervention for improving the revision quality of second language (L2) writing. With a quasi-experimental design, it explored whether TAPs trigger deeper processing of WCF under two WCF-type conditions: direct or indirect WCF. Participants were 80 high-intermediate learners of English as a second language (ESL) at a US university who were divided into (1) direct WCF+TAPs; (2) direct WCF-only; (3) indirect WCF+TAPs; and (4) indirect WCF-only. The impacts of the interventions were gauged by changes in seven subsystems of complexity-accuracy-lexis (CAL) between the first and final drafts of narrative essays. Results showed differential impacts of the four conditions depending on the linguistic dimensions, including some negative impacts of TAPs. Participants' comments during TAP sessions were used to triangulate the interventions' effects. We conclude that WCF and TAPs promoted different types of processing; while WCF contributed to the potential restructuring of learners' interlanguage systems, TAPs triggered learners' higher-order thinking and served as a self-reflection tool to make strategic decisions in revising the text.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1508109
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1508109
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback: Examination of Feedback Types and Think-Aloud Protocol as Pedagogical Interventions
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mahmoud+Abdi+Tabari%22">Mahmoud Abdi Tabari</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-5415">0000-0002-8022-5415</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Masatoshi+Sato%22">Masatoshi Sato</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7111-3406">0000-0001-7111-3406</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yizhou+Wang%22">Yizhou Wang</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Language+Teaching+Research%22"><i>Language Teaching Research</i></searchLink>. 2026 30(5):2865-2898.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 34
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Error+Correction%22">Error Correction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Protocol+Analysis%22">Protocol Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intervention%22">Intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Instruction%22">Second Language Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Instruction%22">Writing Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Evaluation%22">Writing Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Revision+%28Written+Composition%29%22">Revision (Written Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Syntax%22">Syntax</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22">English (Second Language)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Universities%22">Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Written+Language%22">Written Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Essays%22">Essays</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1177/13621688231202574
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1362-1688<br />1477-0954
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This study examined the combined effects of written corrective feedback (WCF) and think-aloud protocols (TAPs) as two types of pedagogical intervention for improving the revision quality of second language (L2) writing. With a quasi-experimental design, it explored whether TAPs trigger deeper processing of WCF under two WCF-type conditions: direct or indirect WCF. Participants were 80 high-intermediate learners of English as a second language (ESL) at a US university who were divided into (1) direct WCF+TAPs; (2) direct WCF-only; (3) indirect WCF+TAPs; and (4) indirect WCF-only. The impacts of the interventions were gauged by changes in seven subsystems of complexity-accuracy-lexis (CAL) between the first and final drafts of narrative essays. Results showed differential impacts of the four conditions depending on the linguistic dimensions, including some negative impacts of TAPs. Participants' comments during TAP sessions were used to triangulate the interventions' effects. We conclude that WCF and TAPs promoted different types of processing; while WCF contributed to the potential restructuring of learners' interlanguage systems, TAPs triggered learners' higher-order thinking and served as a self-reflection tool to make strategic decisions in revising the text.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1508109
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1508109
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1177/13621688231202574
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 34
        StartPage: 2865
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Error Correction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Protocol Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intervention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Second Language Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Revision (Written Composition)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Syntax
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: English (Second Language)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Universities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Written Language
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Essays
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback: Examination of Feedback Types and Think-Aloud Protocol as Pedagogical Interventions
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mahmoud Abdi Tabari
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Masatoshi Sato
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Yizhou Wang
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1362-1688
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1477-0954
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 30
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Language Teaching Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1