Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback: Examination of Feedback Types and Think-Aloud Protocol as Pedagogical Interventions
Saved in:
| Title: | Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback: Examination of Feedback Types and Think-Aloud Protocol as Pedagogical Interventions |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Mahmoud Abdi Tabari (ORCID |
| Source: | Language Teaching Research. 2026 30(5):2865-2898. |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 34 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Feedback (Response), Error Correction, Protocol Analysis, Intervention, Teaching Methods, Second Language Instruction, Writing Instruction, Writing Evaluation, Revision (Written Composition), Syntax, Undergraduate Students, English (Second Language), Universities, Written Language, Essays |
| DOI: | 10.1177/13621688231202574 |
| ISSN: | 1362-1688 1477-0954 |
| Abstract: | This study examined the combined effects of written corrective feedback (WCF) and think-aloud protocols (TAPs) as two types of pedagogical intervention for improving the revision quality of second language (L2) writing. With a quasi-experimental design, it explored whether TAPs trigger deeper processing of WCF under two WCF-type conditions: direct or indirect WCF. Participants were 80 high-intermediate learners of English as a second language (ESL) at a US university who were divided into (1) direct WCF+TAPs; (2) direct WCF-only; (3) indirect WCF+TAPs; and (4) indirect WCF-only. The impacts of the interventions were gauged by changes in seven subsystems of complexity-accuracy-lexis (CAL) between the first and final drafts of narrative essays. Results showed differential impacts of the four conditions depending on the linguistic dimensions, including some negative impacts of TAPs. Participants' comments during TAP sessions were used to triangulate the interventions' effects. We conclude that WCF and TAPs promoted different types of processing; while WCF contributed to the potential restructuring of learners' interlanguage systems, TAPs triggered learners' higher-order thinking and served as a self-reflection tool to make strategic decisions in revising the text. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1508109 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1508109 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback: Examination of Feedback Types and Think-Aloud Protocol as Pedagogical Interventions – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mahmoud+Abdi+Tabari%22">Mahmoud Abdi Tabari</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-5415">0000-0002-8022-5415</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Masatoshi+Sato%22">Masatoshi Sato</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7111-3406">0000-0001-7111-3406</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yizhou+Wang%22">Yizhou Wang</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Language+Teaching+Research%22"><i>Language Teaching Research</i></searchLink>. 2026 30(5):2865-2898. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 34 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Error+Correction%22">Error Correction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Protocol+Analysis%22">Protocol Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intervention%22">Intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Instruction%22">Second Language Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Instruction%22">Writing Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Evaluation%22">Writing Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Revision+%28Written+Composition%29%22">Revision (Written Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Syntax%22">Syntax</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22">English (Second Language)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Universities%22">Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Written+Language%22">Written Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Essays%22">Essays</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1177/13621688231202574 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1362-1688<br />1477-0954 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study examined the combined effects of written corrective feedback (WCF) and think-aloud protocols (TAPs) as two types of pedagogical intervention for improving the revision quality of second language (L2) writing. With a quasi-experimental design, it explored whether TAPs trigger deeper processing of WCF under two WCF-type conditions: direct or indirect WCF. Participants were 80 high-intermediate learners of English as a second language (ESL) at a US university who were divided into (1) direct WCF+TAPs; (2) direct WCF-only; (3) indirect WCF+TAPs; and (4) indirect WCF-only. The impacts of the interventions were gauged by changes in seven subsystems of complexity-accuracy-lexis (CAL) between the first and final drafts of narrative essays. Results showed differential impacts of the four conditions depending on the linguistic dimensions, including some negative impacts of TAPs. Participants' comments during TAP sessions were used to triangulate the interventions' effects. We conclude that WCF and TAPs promoted different types of processing; while WCF contributed to the potential restructuring of learners' interlanguage systems, TAPs triggered learners' higher-order thinking and served as a self-reflection tool to make strategic decisions in revising the text. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1508109 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1508109 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/13621688231202574 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 34 StartPage: 2865 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response) Type: general – SubjectFull: Error Correction Type: general – SubjectFull: Protocol Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Intervention Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Second Language Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Revision (Written Composition) Type: general – SubjectFull: Syntax Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: English (Second Language) Type: general – SubjectFull: Universities Type: general – SubjectFull: Written Language Type: general – SubjectFull: Essays Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Engagement with Written Corrective Feedback: Examination of Feedback Types and Think-Aloud Protocol as Pedagogical Interventions Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mahmoud Abdi Tabari – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Masatoshi Sato – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yizhou Wang IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1362-1688 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1477-0954 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 30 – Type: issue Value: 5 Titles: – TitleFull: Language Teaching Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |