Action Consequences Guide the Use of Visual Working Memory
Saved in:
| Title: | Action Consequences Guide the Use of Visual Working Memory |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Andre Sahakian (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2025 51(1):4-13. |
| Availability: | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 10 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Short Term Memory, Visual Stimuli, Reaction Time, Incentives, Memorization, Foreign Countries, Error Correction, Time Factors (Learning), Information Utilization |
| Geographic Terms: | United Kingdom |
| DOI: | 10.1037/xlm0001326 |
| ISSN: | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
| Abstract: | Visual working memory (VWM) is a store for temporary maintenance of visual information. It is often disregarded, though, that information is typically stored to enable actions. Therefore, the context of these actions is of great importance for how VWM is used. Here, we questioned whether the severity of the consequence of an action might affect how well information is memorized, and how cautiously it is utilized. We employed an (online) copying task, in which participants reproduced an example display comprised of six items in a grid, using a pool of items. Crucially, we manipulated the severity of penalties: participants had to wait 5 (high) or 0.5 (low error cost) s after an error. Additionally, we manipulated the accessibility of task-relevant information (a well-studied manipulation in this paradigm): participants had to wait 5 (high) or 0.5 (low sampling cost) s to inspect the example. Our results show that with higher error cost the number of inspections remained comparable, but the number of errors decreased. Furthermore, they show that with higher sampling cost the number of inspections halved, and the number of errors increased. Thus, more severe action consequences increase the reluctance to act on uncertain information in VWM, but do not lead to more attempts to store information in VWM. We conclude that, in contrast to the effect of the accessibility of information, action consequences do not affect how well information is memorized, but affect how cautiously this stored information is utilized. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Notes: | https://osf.io/e6vpx |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1508287 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1508287 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Action Consequences Guide the Use of Visual Working Memory – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andre+Sahakian%22">Andre Sahakian</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0106-1182">0000-0003-0106-1182</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Surya+Gayet%22">Surya Gayet</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chris+L%2E+E%2E+Paffen%22">Chris L. E. Paffen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Stefan+Van+der+Stigchel%22">Stefan Van der Stigchel</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Experimental+Psychology%3A+Learning%2C+Memory%2C+and+Cognition%22"><i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</i></searchLink>. 2025 51(1):4-13. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 10 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Short+Term+Memory%22">Short Term Memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Visual+Stimuli%22">Visual Stimuli</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reaction+Time%22">Reaction Time</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Incentives%22">Incentives</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Memorization%22">Memorization</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Error+Correction%22">Error Correction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Time+Factors+%28Learning%29%22">Time Factors (Learning)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+Utilization%22">Information Utilization</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1037/xlm0001326 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0278-7393<br />1939-1285 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Visual working memory (VWM) is a store for temporary maintenance of visual information. It is often disregarded, though, that information is typically stored to enable actions. Therefore, the context of these actions is of great importance for how VWM is used. Here, we questioned whether the severity of the consequence of an action might affect how well information is memorized, and how cautiously it is utilized. We employed an (online) copying task, in which participants reproduced an example display comprised of six items in a grid, using a pool of items. Crucially, we manipulated the severity of penalties: participants had to wait 5 (high) or 0.5 (low error cost) s after an error. Additionally, we manipulated the accessibility of task-relevant information (a well-studied manipulation in this paradigm): participants had to wait 5 (high) or 0.5 (low sampling cost) s to inspect the example. Our results show that with higher error cost the number of inspections remained comparable, but the number of errors decreased. Furthermore, they show that with higher sampling cost the number of inspections halved, and the number of errors increased. Thus, more severe action consequences increase the reluctance to act on uncertain information in VWM, but do not lead to more attempts to store information in VWM. We conclude that, in contrast to the effect of the accessibility of information, action consequences do not affect how well information is memorized, but affect how cautiously this stored information is utilized. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Note Label: Notes Group: Note Data: https://osf.io/e6vpx – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1508287 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1508287 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1037/xlm0001326 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 10 StartPage: 4 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Short Term Memory Type: general – SubjectFull: Visual Stimuli Type: general – SubjectFull: Reaction Time Type: general – SubjectFull: Incentives Type: general – SubjectFull: Memorization Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Error Correction Type: general – SubjectFull: Time Factors (Learning) Type: general – SubjectFull: Information Utilization Type: general – SubjectFull: United Kingdom Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Action Consequences Guide the Use of Visual Working Memory Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Andre Sahakian – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Surya Gayet – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Chris L. E. Paffen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Stefan Van der Stigchel IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0278-7393 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1939-1285 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 51 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |