View in EDS

Researcher Development of Pretenured Faculty of Colour in Counselling Programmes in the U.S.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Researcher Development of Pretenured Faculty of Colour in Counselling Programmes in the U.S.
Language: English
Authors: Hongryun Woo (ORCID 0000-0001-7523-7350), Injung Lee (ORCID 0000-0002-2941-2207), Cassandra A. Storlie (ORCID 0000-0002-0750-4450), Jungeun Lee (ORCID 0000-0003-0219-6839), Eunhui Yoon (ORCID 0000-0001-5085-0669)
Source: British Journal of Guidance & Counselling. 2026 54(2):293-306.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 14
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Higher Education, Nontenured Faculty, Minority Group Teachers, Doctoral Students, Counselor Training, College Programs, Racial Identification, Disproportionate Representation, Teaching Experience
DOI: 10.1080/03069885.2026.2619827
ISSN: 0306-9885
1469-3534
Abstract: This study explored the perceptions of researcher development among nine pretenured faculty of colour in counselling in the U.S. using a phenomenological approach as a methodological framework. Five themes emerged from the data: (a) research topics emerging from minority identity and experiences, (b) disrespected research topics and ability, (c) limited and delayed opportunities, (d) duality: pressured to exceed and (e) tokenisation. Implications for counselling faculty and higher education institutions are discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1508396
Database: ERIC
Description
Abstract:This study explored the perceptions of researcher development among nine pretenured faculty of colour in counselling in the U.S. using a phenomenological approach as a methodological framework. Five themes emerged from the data: (a) research topics emerging from minority identity and experiences, (b) disrespected research topics and ability, (c) limited and delayed opportunities, (d) duality: pressured to exceed and (e) tokenisation. Implications for counselling faculty and higher education institutions are discussed.
ISSN:0306-9885
1469-3534
DOI:10.1080/03069885.2026.2619827