Students-Generative AI Interaction Patterns and Its Impact on Academic Writing

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Students-Generative AI Interaction Patterns and Its Impact on Academic Writing
Language: English
Authors: Jinhee Kim (ORCID 0000-0002-3365-7354), Sang-Soog Lee (ORCID 0000-0002-0585-1846), Rita Detrick (ORCID 0009-0000-5610-2864), Jialin Wang (ORCID 0000-0002-1990-1293), Na Li (ORCID 0000-0003-2395-3499)
Source: Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2026 38(1):504-525.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 22
Publication Date: 2026
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Technology Integration, Man Machine Systems, Interaction, Writing (Composition), Academic Language, Behavior Patterns, Digital Literacy, Graduate Students, Foreign Countries, Computer Mediated Communication, Computer Assisted Instruction, Writing Instruction, Epistemology, Network Analysis
Geographic Terms: China
DOI: 10.1007/s12528-025-09444-6
ISSN: 1042-1726
1867-1233
Abstract: Considering both the transformative opportunities and challenges presented by generative AI (GenAI) in academic writing, effectively integrating GenAI into the academic setting becomes a significant need requiring prioritization. Yet, there is limited understanding regarding the nature of interactions between different types of students, what behavioral patterns students exhibit during a student-GenAI interaction (SAI) on a given task, and how these different SAI patterns relate to the actual writing task performance. This study, therefore, aimed to identify SAI patterns of academic writing tasks depending on students' level of AI literacy and examine the differences in academic writing performance between the identified SAI patterns. Drawing from the combination of three data sources, including think-aloud protocols, screen-recordings, and chat histories between 36 Chinese graduate students and a GenAI writing system, epistemic network analysis (ENA) was used to reveal the distinctive SAI patterns of students with different levels of AI literacy. The study found that students with a high level of AI literacy exhibited a collaborative approach to SAI, actively accepting GenAI's suggestions and engaging GenAI in meta-cognitive-related activities such as planning, whereas students with a low level of AI literacy demonstrated much less interaction with GenAI in completing their writing tasks, instead choosing to ideate and evaluate independently. In addition, the Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test was conducted to assess the writing task performance of the two AI literacy groups. Findings revealed statistical differences in all evaluation rubrics (content, structure/organization, expression). This study offers implications for the design and implementation of GenAI agents in writing tasks and the pedagogy of GenAI-assisted instruction.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2026
Accession Number: EJ1509027
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1509027
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Students-Generative AI Interaction Patterns and Its Impact on Academic Writing
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jinhee+Kim%22">Jinhee Kim</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3365-7354">0000-0002-3365-7354</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sang-Soog+Lee%22">Sang-Soog Lee</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0585-1846">0000-0002-0585-1846</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rita+Detrick%22">Rita Detrick</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5610-2864">0009-0000-5610-2864</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jialin+Wang%22">Jialin Wang</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1990-1293">0000-0002-1990-1293</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Na+Li%22">Na Li</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2395-3499">0000-0003-2395-3499</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Computing+in+Higher+Education%22"><i>Journal of Computing in Higher Education</i></searchLink>. 2026 38(1):504-525.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 22
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Integration%22">Technology Integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Man+Machine+Systems%22">Man Machine Systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interaction%22">Interaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+%28Composition%29%22">Writing (Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Language%22">Academic Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavior+Patterns%22">Behavior Patterns</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Digital+Literacy%22">Digital Literacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+Students%22">Graduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Mediated+Communication%22">Computer Mediated Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Assisted+Instruction%22">Computer Assisted Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Instruction%22">Writing Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Epistemology%22">Epistemology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Network+Analysis%22">Network Analysis</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22China%22">China</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s12528-025-09444-6
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1042-1726<br />1867-1233
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Considering both the transformative opportunities and challenges presented by generative AI (GenAI) in academic writing, effectively integrating GenAI into the academic setting becomes a significant need requiring prioritization. Yet, there is limited understanding regarding the nature of interactions between different types of students, what behavioral patterns students exhibit during a student-GenAI interaction (SAI) on a given task, and how these different SAI patterns relate to the actual writing task performance. This study, therefore, aimed to identify SAI patterns of academic writing tasks depending on students' level of AI literacy and examine the differences in academic writing performance between the identified SAI patterns. Drawing from the combination of three data sources, including think-aloud protocols, screen-recordings, and chat histories between 36 Chinese graduate students and a GenAI writing system, epistemic network analysis (ENA) was used to reveal the distinctive SAI patterns of students with different levels of AI literacy. The study found that students with a high level of AI literacy exhibited a collaborative approach to SAI, actively accepting GenAI's suggestions and engaging GenAI in meta-cognitive-related activities such as planning, whereas students with a low level of AI literacy demonstrated much less interaction with GenAI in completing their writing tasks, instead choosing to ideate and evaluate independently. In addition, the Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test was conducted to assess the writing task performance of the two AI literacy groups. Findings revealed statistical differences in all evaluation rubrics (content, structure/organization, expression). This study offers implications for the design and implementation of GenAI agents in writing tasks and the pedagogy of GenAI-assisted instruction.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2026
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1509027
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1509027
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s12528-025-09444-6
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 22
        StartPage: 504
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technology Integration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Man Machine Systems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Interaction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing (Composition)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic Language
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Behavior Patterns
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Digital Literacy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Graduate Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer Mediated Communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer Assisted Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Epistemology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Network Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: China
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Students-Generative AI Interaction Patterns and Its Impact on Academic Writing
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jinhee Kim
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sang-Soog Lee
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rita Detrick
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Jialin Wang
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Na Li
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2026
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1042-1726
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1867-1233
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 38
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Computing in Higher Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1