Students-Generative AI Interaction Patterns and Its Impact on Academic Writing
Saved in:
| Title: | Students-Generative AI Interaction Patterns and Its Impact on Academic Writing |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Jinhee Kim (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2026 38(1):504-525. |
| Availability: | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 22 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Technology Integration, Man Machine Systems, Interaction, Writing (Composition), Academic Language, Behavior Patterns, Digital Literacy, Graduate Students, Foreign Countries, Computer Mediated Communication, Computer Assisted Instruction, Writing Instruction, Epistemology, Network Analysis |
| Geographic Terms: | China |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s12528-025-09444-6 |
| ISSN: | 1042-1726 1867-1233 |
| Abstract: | Considering both the transformative opportunities and challenges presented by generative AI (GenAI) in academic writing, effectively integrating GenAI into the academic setting becomes a significant need requiring prioritization. Yet, there is limited understanding regarding the nature of interactions between different types of students, what behavioral patterns students exhibit during a student-GenAI interaction (SAI) on a given task, and how these different SAI patterns relate to the actual writing task performance. This study, therefore, aimed to identify SAI patterns of academic writing tasks depending on students' level of AI literacy and examine the differences in academic writing performance between the identified SAI patterns. Drawing from the combination of three data sources, including think-aloud protocols, screen-recordings, and chat histories between 36 Chinese graduate students and a GenAI writing system, epistemic network analysis (ENA) was used to reveal the distinctive SAI patterns of students with different levels of AI literacy. The study found that students with a high level of AI literacy exhibited a collaborative approach to SAI, actively accepting GenAI's suggestions and engaging GenAI in meta-cognitive-related activities such as planning, whereas students with a low level of AI literacy demonstrated much less interaction with GenAI in completing their writing tasks, instead choosing to ideate and evaluate independently. In addition, the Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test was conducted to assess the writing task performance of the two AI literacy groups. Findings revealed statistical differences in all evaluation rubrics (content, structure/organization, expression). This study offers implications for the design and implementation of GenAI agents in writing tasks and the pedagogy of GenAI-assisted instruction. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2026 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1509027 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1509027 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Students-Generative AI Interaction Patterns and Its Impact on Academic Writing – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jinhee+Kim%22">Jinhee Kim</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3365-7354">0000-0002-3365-7354</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sang-Soog+Lee%22">Sang-Soog Lee</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0585-1846">0000-0002-0585-1846</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rita+Detrick%22">Rita Detrick</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5610-2864">0009-0000-5610-2864</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jialin+Wang%22">Jialin Wang</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1990-1293">0000-0002-1990-1293</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Na+Li%22">Na Li</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2395-3499">0000-0003-2395-3499</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Computing+in+Higher+Education%22"><i>Journal of Computing in Higher Education</i></searchLink>. 2026 38(1):504-525. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 22 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Integration%22">Technology Integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Man+Machine+Systems%22">Man Machine Systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interaction%22">Interaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+%28Composition%29%22">Writing (Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Language%22">Academic Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavior+Patterns%22">Behavior Patterns</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Digital+Literacy%22">Digital Literacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+Students%22">Graduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Mediated+Communication%22">Computer Mediated Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Assisted+Instruction%22">Computer Assisted Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Instruction%22">Writing Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Epistemology%22">Epistemology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Network+Analysis%22">Network Analysis</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22China%22">China</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1007/s12528-025-09444-6 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1042-1726<br />1867-1233 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Considering both the transformative opportunities and challenges presented by generative AI (GenAI) in academic writing, effectively integrating GenAI into the academic setting becomes a significant need requiring prioritization. Yet, there is limited understanding regarding the nature of interactions between different types of students, what behavioral patterns students exhibit during a student-GenAI interaction (SAI) on a given task, and how these different SAI patterns relate to the actual writing task performance. This study, therefore, aimed to identify SAI patterns of academic writing tasks depending on students' level of AI literacy and examine the differences in academic writing performance between the identified SAI patterns. Drawing from the combination of three data sources, including think-aloud protocols, screen-recordings, and chat histories between 36 Chinese graduate students and a GenAI writing system, epistemic network analysis (ENA) was used to reveal the distinctive SAI patterns of students with different levels of AI literacy. The study found that students with a high level of AI literacy exhibited a collaborative approach to SAI, actively accepting GenAI's suggestions and engaging GenAI in meta-cognitive-related activities such as planning, whereas students with a low level of AI literacy demonstrated much less interaction with GenAI in completing their writing tasks, instead choosing to ideate and evaluate independently. In addition, the Wilcoxon rank-sum (Mann-Whitney U) test was conducted to assess the writing task performance of the two AI literacy groups. Findings revealed statistical differences in all evaluation rubrics (content, structure/organization, expression). This study offers implications for the design and implementation of GenAI agents in writing tasks and the pedagogy of GenAI-assisted instruction. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1509027 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1509027 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s12528-025-09444-6 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 22 StartPage: 504 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Integration Type: general – SubjectFull: Man Machine Systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Interaction Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing (Composition) Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Language Type: general – SubjectFull: Behavior Patterns Type: general – SubjectFull: Digital Literacy Type: general – SubjectFull: Graduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Mediated Communication Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Assisted Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Epistemology Type: general – SubjectFull: Network Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: China Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Students-Generative AI Interaction Patterns and Its Impact on Academic Writing Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jinhee Kim – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sang-Soog Lee – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rita Detrick – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jialin Wang – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Na Li IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1042-1726 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1867-1233 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 38 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Computing in Higher Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |