The Performance of ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models on Multiple-Choice Questions in Biomedical Disciplines: A Meta-Analysis
Saved in:
| Title: | The Performance of ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models on Multiple-Choice Questions in Biomedical Disciplines: A Meta-Analysis |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Colleen M. Cheverko (ORCID |
| Source: | Anatomical Sciences Education. 2026 19(9):1556-1569. |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 14 |
| Publication Date: | 2026 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Information Analyses Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Natural Language Processing, Computer Assisted Testing, Multiple Choice Tests, Biomedicine, Meta Analysis, Accuracy, Supplementary Education, Medical Education |
| DOI: | 10.1002/ase.70262 |
| ISSN: | 1935-9772 1935-9780 |
| Abstract: | While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise as learning tools for medical education, their reported accuracy on multiple-choice questions (MCQs) varies widely across studies, necessitating synthesis. This meta-analysis synthesizes LLM accuracy on text-based MCQs from biomedical disciplines and USMLE Step 1-level content and explores study characteristics that moderate LLM performance. Studies published between January 1, 2022, and August 5, 2025, were identified using seven databases. Titles and abstracts were screened against eligibility criteria, which included testing LLM performance on text-based MCQs in English. Extracted data included accuracy rates (correct responses/total questions) and study characteristics. A random-effects proportional meta-analysis was used to calculate the pooled accuracy of LLM versions across studies, and a meta-regression tested the effects of study characteristics on accuracy. The final analysis included 41 articles comprising 207 proportions. Newer OpenAI models (GPT-4o through GPT o1 = 90%; GPT-4 = 82%) demonstrated significantly higher accuracy than earlier versions (GPT-3/3.5 = 59%; p < 0.001). Model version explained 56% of the total variance (p < 0.001). The pooled accuracy of newer Anthropic (Claude 3 through 3.7 = 86%) and DeepSeek (R1 = 86%) versions fell within the range of performance for the newer OpenAI versions, while newer Google (Gemini series = 76%) and Microsoft (Copilot = 69%) versions demonstrated lower performance. A discipline-level analysis demonstrated that OpenAI's GPT-4 through GPT-o1 models achieved pooled accuracy rates between 83 and 87% for most disciplines, including the anatomical sciences. These findings demonstrate that newer LLMs are achieving higher accuracy than older models on biomedical and Step 1-level MCQs, supporting their potential integration as supplementary study tools in foundational biomedical education. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 20260101 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1517238 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1517238 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Performance of ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models on Multiple-Choice Questions in Biomedical Disciplines: A Meta-Analysis – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Colleen+M%2E+Cheverko%22">Colleen M. Cheverko</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9065-1768">0000-0002-9065-1768</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Volodymyr+Mavrych%22">Volodymyr Mavrych</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Olena+Bolgova%22">Olena Bolgova</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9496-9754">0009-0002-9496-9754</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fathima+Raahima+Riyas+Moham%22">Fathima Raahima Riyas Moham</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jennifer+Westrick%22">Jennifer Westrick</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3606-3957">0000-0002-3606-3957</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lorena+Juarez%22">Lorena Juarez</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Emily+Rush%22">Emily Rush</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kathryn+A%2E+Solka%22">Kathryn A. Solka</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Alison+F%2E+Doubleday%22">Alison F. Doubleday</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jessica+N%2E+Byram%22">Jessica N. Byram</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7097-8352">0000-0001-7097-8352</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Robert+Becker%22">Robert Becker</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Victoria+Gomez%22">Victoria Gomez</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brenda+K%2E+Anak+Ganeng%22">Brenda K. Anak Ganeng</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leslie+A%2E+Hoffman%22">Leslie A. Hoffman</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Victoria+A%2E+Roach%22">Victoria A. Roach</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4020-2224">0000-0003-4020-2224</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kirsten+M%2E+Brown%22">Kirsten M. Brown</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nicole+DeVaul%22">Nicole DeVaul</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Colleen+N%2E+Garnett%22">Colleen N. Garnett</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9426-9304">0000-0002-9426-9304</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hannah+L%2E+Herriott%22">Hannah L. Herriott</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5410-0360">0000-0002-5410-0360</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rebecca+S%2E+Lufler%22">Rebecca S. Lufler</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jason+C%2E+Mussell%22">Jason C. Mussell</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4123-3356">0000-0003-4123-3356</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Joy+Y%2E+Balta%22">Joy Y. Balta</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Michael+A%2E+Pascoe%22">Michael A. Pascoe</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jason+W%2E+Middleton%22">Jason W. Middleton</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sharon+Duffy%22">Sharon Duffy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Georgina+C%2E+Stephens%22">Georgina C. Stephens</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9695-7592">0000-0001-9695-7592</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Adam+B%2E+Wilson%22">Adam B. Wilson</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Anatomical+Sciences+Education%22"><i>Anatomical Sciences Education</i></searchLink>. 2026 19(9):1556-1569. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 14 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2026 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Natural+Language+Processing%22">Natural Language Processing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Assisted+Testing%22">Computer Assisted Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multiple+Choice+Tests%22">Multiple Choice Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biomedicine%22">Biomedicine</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Meta+Analysis%22">Meta Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accuracy%22">Accuracy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Supplementary+Education%22">Supplementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Medical+Education%22">Medical Education</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1002/ase.70262 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1935-9772<br />1935-9780 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: While large language models (LLMs) have shown promise as learning tools for medical education, their reported accuracy on multiple-choice questions (MCQs) varies widely across studies, necessitating synthesis. This meta-analysis synthesizes LLM accuracy on text-based MCQs from biomedical disciplines and USMLE Step 1-level content and explores study characteristics that moderate LLM performance. Studies published between January 1, 2022, and August 5, 2025, were identified using seven databases. Titles and abstracts were screened against eligibility criteria, which included testing LLM performance on text-based MCQs in English. Extracted data included accuracy rates (correct responses/total questions) and study characteristics. A random-effects proportional meta-analysis was used to calculate the pooled accuracy of LLM versions across studies, and a meta-regression tested the effects of study characteristics on accuracy. The final analysis included 41 articles comprising 207 proportions. Newer OpenAI models (GPT-4o through GPT o1 = 90%; GPT-4 = 82%) demonstrated significantly higher accuracy than earlier versions (GPT-3/3.5 = 59%; p < 0.001). Model version explained 56% of the total variance (p < 0.001). The pooled accuracy of newer Anthropic (Claude 3 through 3.7 = 86%) and DeepSeek (R1 = 86%) versions fell within the range of performance for the newer OpenAI versions, while newer Google (Gemini series = 76%) and Microsoft (Copilot = 69%) versions demonstrated lower performance. A discipline-level analysis demonstrated that OpenAI's GPT-4 through GPT-o1 models achieved pooled accuracy rates between 83 and 87% for most disciplines, including the anatomical sciences. These findings demonstrate that newer LLMs are achieving higher accuracy than older models on biomedical and Step 1-level MCQs, supporting their potential integration as supplementary study tools in foundational biomedical education. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 20260101 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1517238 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1517238 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/ase.70262 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 14 StartPage: 1556 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Natural Language Processing Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Assisted Testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Multiple Choice Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Biomedicine Type: general – SubjectFull: Meta Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Accuracy Type: general – SubjectFull: Supplementary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Medical Education Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Performance of ChatGPT and Other Large Language Models on Multiple-Choice Questions in Biomedical Disciplines: A Meta-Analysis Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Colleen M. Cheverko – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Volodymyr Mavrych – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Olena Bolgova – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fathima Raahima Riyas Moham – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jennifer Westrick – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lorena Juarez – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Emily Rush – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kathryn A. Solka – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Alison F. Doubleday – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jessica N. Byram – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Robert Becker – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Victoria Gomez – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Brenda K. Anak Ganeng – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Leslie A. Hoffman – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Victoria A. Roach – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kirsten M. Brown – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nicole DeVaul – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Colleen N. Garnett – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hannah L. Herriott – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rebecca S. Lufler – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jason C. Mussell – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Joy Y. Balta – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Michael A. Pascoe – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jason W. Middleton – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sharon Duffy – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Georgina C. Stephens – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Adam B. Wilson IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 09 Type: published Y: 2026 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1935-9772 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1935-9780 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 19 – Type: issue Value: 9 Titles: – TitleFull: Anatomical Sciences Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |