View in EDS PDF Full Text

A Rural-Urban Comparison of Welfare Exits: The Importance of Population Density.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Rural-Urban Comparison of Welfare Exits: The Importance of Population Density.
Language: English
Authors: Rank, Mark R., Hirschl, Thomas A.
Source: Rural Sociology. Sum 1988 53(2):190-206.
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 17
Publication Date: 1988
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Population Distribution, Rural Urban Differences, Self Concept, Social Attitudes, Social Environment, Social Influences, Social Theories, Welfare Recipients, Welfare Services
ISSN: 0036-0112
Abstract: Examines effects of rural urban differences on duration of welfare use. Reveals that welfare recipients in areas of population sparsity are more likely to exit welfare, regardless of household, demographic, and welfare characteristics. Suggests perceived stigma, patterns of social interaction distinguish between rural and urban welfare recipients. Contains 44 references. (DHP)
Entry Date: 1989
Accession Number: EJ382722
Database: ERIC
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwF57-JVlHYwMwqoCMiPFwKMAAAA4jCB3wYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHRMIHOAgEAMIHIBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDM2aaBHG76Hjgm8RugIBEICBmrjcGB7wlAEsvd5JJyPXZUNpJN0JdxwX4bMj79CBWquAKnr9qhg2MLM0I3Y8XDcAcz1clX59p1DHBdOG6M20KX6uH1y--Z8f96Fo6aHDEcyH6qFRfs2kc9-cXe-CnXpo5mw-f90NzVGhrJmNOZn_QNlXGOi8LrGHRAGbgFmst33PRs_ZMsfPPCMx8nJ_UIVGYfAvYA6rUw_0p5Q=
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ382722
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: A Rural-Urban Comparison of Welfare Exits: The Importance of Population Density.
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rank%2C+Mark+R%2E%22">Rank, Mark R.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hirschl%2C+Thomas+A%2E%22">Hirschl, Thomas A.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Rural+Sociology%22"><i>Rural Sociology</i></searchLink>. Sum 1988 53(2):190-206.
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 17
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1988
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Population+Distribution%22">Population Distribution</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rural+Urban+Differences%22">Rural Urban Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Concept%22">Self Concept</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Attitudes%22">Social Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Environment%22">Social Environment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Influences%22">Social Influences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Theories%22">Social Theories</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Welfare+Recipients%22">Welfare Recipients</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Welfare+Services%22">Welfare Services</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0036-0112
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Examines effects of rural urban differences on duration of welfare use. Reveals that welfare recipients in areas of population sparsity are more likely to exit welfare, regardless of household, demographic, and welfare characteristics. Suggests perceived stigma, patterns of social interaction distinguish between rural and urban welfare recipients. Contains 44 references. (DHP)
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1989
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ382722
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ382722
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 17
        StartPage: 190
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Population Distribution
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Rural Urban Differences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self Concept
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social Environment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social Influences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social Theories
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Welfare Recipients
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Welfare Services
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: A Rural-Urban Comparison of Welfare Exits: The Importance of Population Density.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rank, Mark R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Hirschl, Thomas A.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 1988
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0036-0112
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 53
            – Type: issue
              Value: 2
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Rural Sociology
              Type: main
ResultId 1