A Comparison of Holistic versus Decomposed Rating of Position Analysis Questionnaire Work Dimensions.
Saved in:
| Title: | A Comparison of Holistic versus Decomposed Rating of Position Analysis Questionnaire Work Dimensions. |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Butler, Stephanie K., Harvey, Robert J. |
| Source: | Personnel Psychology. Win 1988 41(4):761-771. |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 11 |
| Publication Date: | 1988 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Cost Effectiveness, Evaluation Methods, Graduate Students, Higher Education, Holistic Approach, Job Analysis, Professional Personnel, Undergraduate Students |
| Abstract: | Examined technique for improving cost-effectiveness of Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ) in job analysis. Professional job analysts, industrial psychology graduate students familiar with PAQ, and PAQ-unfamiliar undergraduates made direct holistic ratings of PAQ dimensions for four familiar jobs. Comparison of holistic ratings with decomposed PAQ dimension profiles showed holistic method ineffective for reducing cost of PAQ job analyses. (Author/NB) |
| Entry Date: | 1989 |
| Accession Number: | EJ390222 |
| Database: | ERIC |
Be the first to leave a comment!
