View in EDS

'Who Won?': A Critical Examination of Newspaper Editorials Evaluating Nationally Televised Presidential Debates.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: 'Who Won?': A Critical Examination of Newspaper Editorials Evaluating Nationally Televised Presidential Debates.
Language: English
Authors: Morello, John T.
Source: Argumentation and Advocacy. Win 1991 27(3):114-125.
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 1991
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Communication Research, Debate, Editorials, Higher Education, Newspapers, Persuasive Discourse, Presidential Campaigns (United States)
ISSN: 1051-1431
Abstract: Examines the types of arguments used in newspaper editorials about presidential debates. Advances three claims about argumentative criteria employed in declaring winners: editorials contain the same flaws media critics find in the debates themselves; the press uses debate criteria which it admits are flawed; and ineffectual argumentative criteria demean the role of presidential debates in the political process. (SR)
Entry Date: 1992
Accession Number: EJ432576
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ432576
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: 'Who Won?': A Critical Examination of Newspaper Editorials Evaluating Nationally Televised Presidential Debates.
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Morello%2C+John+T%2E%22">Morello, John T.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Argumentation+and+Advocacy%22"><i>Argumentation and Advocacy</i></searchLink>. Win 1991 27(3):114-125.
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 12
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1991
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communication+Research%22">Communication Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Debate%22">Debate</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Editorials%22">Editorials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Newspapers%22">Newspapers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Persuasive+Discourse%22">Persuasive Discourse</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Presidential+Campaigns+%28United+States%29%22">Presidential Campaigns (United States)</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1051-1431
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Examines the types of arguments used in newspaper editorials about presidential debates. Advances three claims about argumentative criteria employed in declaring winners: editorials contain the same flaws media critics find in the debates themselves; the press uses debate criteria which it admits are flawed; and ineffectual argumentative criteria demean the role of presidential debates in the political process. (SR)
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 1992
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ432576
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ432576
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
        StartPage: 114
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Communication Research
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Debate
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Editorials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Higher Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Newspapers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Persuasive Discourse
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Presidential Campaigns (United States)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: 'Who Won?': A Critical Examination of Newspaper Editorials Evaluating Nationally Televised Presidential Debates.
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Morello, John T.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 1991
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1051-1431
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 27
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Argumentation and Advocacy
              Type: main
ResultId 1