View in EDS

Why Children and Adults Sometimes (but not Always) Compute Implicatures

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Why Children and Adults Sometimes (but not Always) Compute Implicatures
Language: English
Authors: Guasti, Maria Teresa, Chierchia, Gennaro, Crain, Stephen, Foppolo, Francesca, Gualmini, Andrea, Meroni, Luisa
Source: Language and Cognitive Processes. Oct 2005 20(5):667-696.
Availability: Customer Services for Taylor & Francis Group Journals, 325 Chestnut Street, Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420 (Toll Free); Fax: 215-625-8914.
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 30
Publication Date: 2005
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Education
Descriptors: Research Methodology, Prerequisites, Young Children, Adults, Foreign Countries, Inferences, Pragmatics, Logical Thinking, Semantics, Language Processing
Geographic Terms: Italy
ISSN: 0169-0965
Abstract: Noveck (2001) argued that children even as old as 11 do not reliably endorse a scalar interpretation of weak scalar terms ("some", "might", "or") (cf. Braine & Rumain, 1981; Smith, 1980). More recent studies suggest, however, that children's apparent failures may depend on the experimental demands (Papafragou & Musolino, 2003). Although previous studies involved children of different ages as well as different tasks, and are thus not directly comparable, nevertheless a common finding is that children do not seem to derive scalar implicatures to the same extent as adults do. The present article describes a series of experiments that were conducted with Italian speaking subjects (children and adults), focusing mainly on the scalar term "some". Our goal was to carefully examine the specific conditions that allow the computation of implicatures by children. In so doing, we demonstrate that children as young as 7 (the youngest age of the children who participated in the Noveck study) are able to compute implicatures in experimental conditions that properly satisfy certain contextual prerequisites for deriving such implicatures. We also present further results that have general consequences for the research methodology employed in this area of study. Our research indicates that certain tasks mask children's understanding of scalar terms, not only including the task used by Noveck, but also tasks that employ certain explicit instructions, such as the training task used by Papafragou & Musolino (2003). Our findings indicate further that, although explicit training apparently improves children's ability to draw implicatures, children nevertheless fail to achieve adult levels of performance for most scalar terms even in such tasks, and that the effects of instruction do not last beyond the training session itself for most children. Another relevant finding of the present study is that some of the manipulations of the experimental context have an effect on all subjects, whereas others produce effects on just a subset of children. Individual differences of this kind may have been concealed in previous research because performance by individual subjects was not reported. Our general conclusions are that even young children (7-year olds) have the prerequisites for deriving scalar implicatures, although these abilities are revealed only when the conversational background is natural.
Abstractor: Author
Number of References: 13
Entry Date: 2005
Access URL: https://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=1NXYQX15AWA6Y2W0
Accession Number: EJ717900
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ717900
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Why Children and Adults Sometimes (but not Always) Compute Implicatures
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Guasti%2C+Maria+Teresa%22">Guasti, Maria Teresa</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Chierchia%2C+Gennaro%22">Chierchia, Gennaro</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Crain%2C+Stephen%22">Crain, Stephen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Foppolo%2C+Francesca%22">Foppolo, Francesca</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gualmini%2C+Andrea%22">Gualmini, Andrea</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Meroni%2C+Luisa%22">Meroni, Luisa</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Language+and+Cognitive+Processes%22"><i>Language and Cognitive Processes</i></searchLink>. Oct 2005 20(5):667-696.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Customer Services for Taylor & Francis Group Journals, 325 Chestnut Street, Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420 (Toll Free); Fax: 215-625-8914.
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 30
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2005
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Methodology%22">Research Methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prerequisites%22">Prerequisites</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Young+Children%22">Young Children</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adults%22">Adults</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Inferences%22">Inferences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pragmatics%22">Pragmatics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Logical+Thinking%22">Logical Thinking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Semantics%22">Semantics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Processing%22">Language Processing</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Italy%22">Italy</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0169-0965
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Noveck (2001) argued that children even as old as 11 do not reliably endorse a scalar interpretation of weak scalar terms ("some", "might", "or") (cf. Braine & Rumain, 1981; Smith, 1980). More recent studies suggest, however, that children's apparent failures may depend on the experimental demands (Papafragou & Musolino, 2003). Although previous studies involved children of different ages as well as different tasks, and are thus not directly comparable, nevertheless a common finding is that children do not seem to derive scalar implicatures to the same extent as adults do. The present article describes a series of experiments that were conducted with Italian speaking subjects (children and adults), focusing mainly on the scalar term "some". Our goal was to carefully examine the specific conditions that allow the computation of implicatures by children. In so doing, we demonstrate that children as young as 7 (the youngest age of the children who participated in the Noveck study) are able to compute implicatures in experimental conditions that properly satisfy certain contextual prerequisites for deriving such implicatures. We also present further results that have general consequences for the research methodology employed in this area of study. Our research indicates that certain tasks mask children's understanding of scalar terms, not only including the task used by Noveck, but also tasks that employ certain explicit instructions, such as the training task used by Papafragou & Musolino (2003). Our findings indicate further that, although explicit training apparently improves children's ability to draw implicatures, children nevertheless fail to achieve adult levels of performance for most scalar terms even in such tasks, and that the effects of instruction do not last beyond the training session itself for most children. Another relevant finding of the present study is that some of the manipulations of the experimental context have an effect on all subjects, whereas others produce effects on just a subset of children. Individual differences of this kind may have been concealed in previous research because performance by individual subjects was not reported. Our general conclusions are that even young children (7-year olds) have the prerequisites for deriving scalar implicatures, although these abilities are revealed only when the conversational background is natural.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: Author
– Name: Ref
  Label: Number of References
  Group: RefInfo
  Data: 13
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2005
– Name: URL
  Label: Access URL
  Group: URL
  Data: <link linkTarget="URL" linkTerm="https://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=1NXYQX15AWA6Y2W0" linkWindow="_blank">http://taylorandfrancis.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=1NXYQX15AWA6Y2W0</link>
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ717900
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ717900
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 30
        StartPage: 667
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Research Methodology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Prerequisites
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Young Children
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Adults
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Inferences
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pragmatics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Logical Thinking
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Semantics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Language Processing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Italy
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Why Children and Adults Sometimes (but not Always) Compute Implicatures
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Guasti, Maria Teresa
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Chierchia, Gennaro
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Crain, Stephen
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Foppolo, Francesca
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gualmini, Andrea
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Meroni, Luisa
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 09
              Type: published
              Y: 2005
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0169-0965
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 20
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Language and Cognitive Processes
              Type: main
ResultId 1