A Systemic, Flexible, and Multidimensional Model for Evaluating E-Learning Programs
Saved in:
| Title: | A Systemic, Flexible, and Multidimensional Model for Evaluating E-Learning Programs |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Mungania, Peni, Hatcher, Tim |
| Source: | Performance Improvement. Aug 2004 43(7):33-39. |
| Availability: | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Subscription Department, 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774. Tel: 800-825-7550; Tel: 201-748-6645; Fax: 201-748-6021; e-mail: subinfo@wiley.com; Web site: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/browse/?type=JOURNAL |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Physical Description: | |
| Page Count: | 7 |
| Publication Date: | 2004 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Program Effectiveness, Program Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Community Needs, Distance Education, Learning Processes, Outcomes of Education, Instructional Effectiveness, Models, Systems Approach, Individual Needs |
| DOI: | 10.1002/pfi.4140430710 |
| ISSN: | 1090-8811 |
| Abstract: | Organizations value the business impact and benefits that accompany e-learning, such as workforce effectiveness, reduced training costs, and improved workforce retention (Taylor, 2001). However, although justifying the value of evaluation is clear, "e-learning evaluations often do not receive the priority that they deserve" (Tanquist, 2000, p. 1). Thus, evaluating e-learning effectiveness is essential, and "all e-learning activities should incorporate at least some form of evaluation" (Tanquist, 2000, p. 5). The purpose of this article is to call more attention to the value of evaluation and to suggest an added approach for evaluating distance learning courses and programs. It addresses the factors that impact distance learners by suggesting an alternative approach to e-learning that focuses on both process and outcomes. The suggested model and matrix support undertaking the evaluation process with a systems-thinking orientation and with individual, organizational, and community needs and resources in mind. (Contains 3 figures.) |
| Abstractor: | ERIC |
| Number of References: | 29 |
| Entry Date: | 2007 |
| Accession Number: | EJ771814 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ771814 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A Systemic, Flexible, and Multidimensional Model for Evaluating E-Learning Programs – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mungania%2C+Peni%22">Mungania, Peni</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hatcher%2C+Tim%22">Hatcher, Tim</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Performance+Improvement%22"><i>Performance Improvement</i></searchLink>. Aug 2004 43(7):33-39. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Subscription Department, 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030-5774. Tel: 800-825-7550; Tel: 201-748-6645; Fax: 201-748-6021; e-mail: subinfo@wiley.com; Web site: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/browse/?type=JOURNAL – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: PhysDesc Label: Physical Description Group: PhysDesc Data: PDF – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 7 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2004 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Evaluation%22">Program Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Community+Needs%22">Community Needs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Distance+Education%22">Distance Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Processes%22">Learning Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Outcomes+of+Education%22">Outcomes of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Effectiveness%22">Instructional Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Systems+Approach%22">Systems Approach</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+Needs%22">Individual Needs</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1002/pfi.4140430710 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1090-8811 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Organizations value the business impact and benefits that accompany e-learning, such as workforce effectiveness, reduced training costs, and improved workforce retention (Taylor, 2001). However, although justifying the value of evaluation is clear, "e-learning evaluations often do not receive the priority that they deserve" (Tanquist, 2000, p. 1). Thus, evaluating e-learning effectiveness is essential, and "all e-learning activities should incorporate at least some form of evaluation" (Tanquist, 2000, p. 5). The purpose of this article is to call more attention to the value of evaluation and to suggest an added approach for evaluating distance learning courses and programs. It addresses the factors that impact distance learners by suggesting an alternative approach to e-learning that focuses on both process and outcomes. The suggested model and matrix support undertaking the evaluation process with a systems-thinking orientation and with individual, organizational, and community needs and resources in mind. (Contains 3 figures.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: ERIC – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 29 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2007 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ771814 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ771814 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/pfi.4140430710 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 StartPage: 33 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Community Needs Type: general – SubjectFull: Distance Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Outcomes of Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Systems Approach Type: general – SubjectFull: Individual Needs Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A Systemic, Flexible, and Multidimensional Model for Evaluating E-Learning Programs Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mungania, Peni – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hatcher, Tim IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Type: published Y: 2004 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1090-8811 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 43 – Type: issue Value: 7 Titles: – TitleFull: Performance Improvement Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |