Exploring the Attitudes, Experiences and Dynamics of Interaction in Online Groups
Saved in:
| Title: | Exploring the Attitudes, Experiences and Dynamics of Interaction in Online Groups |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Finegold, Adam R. D., Cooke, Louise |
| Source: | Internet and Higher Education. 2006 9(3):201-215. |
| Availability: | Elsevier. 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126; Tel: 407-345-4020; Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com; Web site: http://www.elsevier.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Physical Description: | |
| Page Count: | 15 |
| Publication Date: | 2006 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education |
| Descriptors: | Group Discussion, Computer Mediated Communication, Student Attitudes, Interaction, Content Analysis, Methods, Case Studies, Higher Education, Visual Aids, Questionnaires, Group Dynamics, Familiarity, Collegiality |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.003 |
| ISSN: | 1096-7516 |
| Abstract: | The aim of this research was to improve understanding of the attitudes, experiences and dynamics of interaction of students working in online groups. This was achieved through a case study of postgraduate Information Studies students using the WebCT discussion board at City University in the academic year 2004-2005. Qualitative and quantitative methods were employed in combination including questionnaires, interviews, document analysis, and discussion board analysis. The latter method involved adapting an existing content analysis framework. The findings highlight the significance of group member participation, collegiality, and familiarity among group members. Students enjoyed working in online groups and found the discussion board useful, but often gave preference to other communication methods. Lecturer presence in online groups was found to be important to students, but interaction on the group discussion board was mostly student-centred. Provision of non-referential topic-related information, opinion, and solidarity were the most common types of interaction. (Contains 4 tables.) |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2008 |
| Accession Number: | EJ800778 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ800778 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Exploring the Attitudes, Experiences and Dynamics of Interaction in Online Groups – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Finegold%2C+Adam+R%2E+D%2E%22">Finegold, Adam R. D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cooke%2C+Louise%22">Cooke, Louise</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Internet+and+Higher+Education%22"><i>Internet and Higher Education</i></searchLink>. 2006 9(3):201-215. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Elsevier. 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126; Tel: 407-345-4020; Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com; Web site: http://www.elsevier.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: PhysDesc Label: Physical Description Group: PhysDesc Data: PDF – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 15 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2006 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+Discussion%22">Group Discussion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Mediated+Communication%22">Computer Mediated Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interaction%22">Interaction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Content+Analysis%22">Content Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Methods%22">Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Case+Studies%22">Case Studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Visual+Aids%22">Visual Aids</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Group+Dynamics%22">Group Dynamics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Familiarity%22">Familiarity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Collegiality%22">Collegiality</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.003 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1096-7516 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The aim of this research was to improve understanding of the attitudes, experiences and dynamics of interaction of students working in online groups. This was achieved through a case study of postgraduate Information Studies students using the WebCT discussion board at City University in the academic year 2004-2005. Qualitative and quantitative methods were employed in combination including questionnaires, interviews, document analysis, and discussion board analysis. The latter method involved adapting an existing content analysis framework. The findings highlight the significance of group member participation, collegiality, and familiarity among group members. Students enjoyed working in online groups and found the discussion board useful, but often gave preference to other communication methods. Lecturer presence in online groups was found to be important to students, but interaction on the group discussion board was mostly student-centred. Provision of non-referential topic-related information, opinion, and solidarity were the most common types of interaction. (Contains 4 tables.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2008 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ800778 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ800778 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.003 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 201 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Group Discussion Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Mediated Communication Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Interaction Type: general – SubjectFull: Content Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Case Studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Higher Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Visual Aids Type: general – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Group Dynamics Type: general – SubjectFull: Familiarity Type: general – SubjectFull: Collegiality Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Exploring the Attitudes, Experiences and Dynamics of Interaction in Online Groups Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Finegold, Adam R. D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cooke, Louise IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2006 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1096-7516 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 9 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Internet and Higher Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |