Replicating Milgram Would People Still Obey Today?
Saved in:
| Title: | Replicating Milgram Would People Still Obey Today? |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Burger, Jerry M. |
| Source: | American Psychologist. Jan 2009 64(1):1-11. |
| Availability: | American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 11 |
| Publication Date: | 2009 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Adults, Well Being, Investigations, Empathy, Individual Differences, Compliance (Psychology), Social Behavior, Experiments, Models, Responses, Social Psychology, Gender Differences, Ethnicity |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | Interpersonal Reactivity Index, Beck Anxiety Inventory |
| DOI: | 10.1037/a0010932 |
| ISSN: | 0003-066X |
| Abstract: | The author conducted a partial replication of Stanley Milgram's (1963, 1965, 1974) obedience studies that allowed for useful comparisons with the original investigations while protecting the well-being of participants. Seventy adults participated in a replication of Milgram's Experiment 5 up to the point at which they first heard the learner's verbal protest (150 volts). Because 79% of Milgram's participants who went past this point continued to the end of the shock generator's range, reasonable estimates could be made about what the present participants would have done if allowed to continue. Obedience rates in the 2006 replication were only slightly lower than those Milgram found 45 years earlier. Contrary to expectation, participants who saw a confederate refuse the experimenter's instructions obeyed as often as those who saw no model. Men and women did not differ in their rates of obedience, but there was some evidence that individual differences in empathic concern and desire for control affected participants' responses. (Contains 5 tables and 3 footnotes.) |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 34 |
| Entry Date: | 2009 |
| Accession Number: | EJ825163 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ825163 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Replicating Milgram Would People Still Obey Today? – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burger%2C+Jerry+M%2E%22">Burger, Jerry M.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22American+Psychologist%22"><i>American Psychologist</i></searchLink>. Jan 2009 64(1):1-11. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org/publications – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 11 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2009 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adults%22">Adults</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Well+Being%22">Well Being</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Investigations%22">Investigations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Empathy%22">Empathy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+Differences%22">Individual Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Compliance+%28Psychology%29%22">Compliance (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Behavior%22">Social Behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Experiments%22">Experiments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Responses%22">Responses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Psychology%22">Social Psychology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gender+Differences%22">Gender Differences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethnicity%22">Ethnicity</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Interpersonal+Reactivity+Index%22">Interpersonal Reactivity Index</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Beck+Anxiety+Inventory%22">Beck Anxiety Inventory</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1037/a0010932 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0003-066X – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The author conducted a partial replication of Stanley Milgram's (1963, 1965, 1974) obedience studies that allowed for useful comparisons with the original investigations while protecting the well-being of participants. Seventy adults participated in a replication of Milgram's Experiment 5 up to the point at which they first heard the learner's verbal protest (150 volts). Because 79% of Milgram's participants who went past this point continued to the end of the shock generator's range, reasonable estimates could be made about what the present participants would have done if allowed to continue. Obedience rates in the 2006 replication were only slightly lower than those Milgram found 45 years earlier. Contrary to expectation, participants who saw a confederate refuse the experimenter's instructions obeyed as often as those who saw no model. Men and women did not differ in their rates of obedience, but there was some evidence that individual differences in empathic concern and desire for control affected participants' responses. (Contains 5 tables and 3 footnotes.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 34 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2009 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ825163 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ825163 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1037/a0010932 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Adults Type: general – SubjectFull: Well Being Type: general – SubjectFull: Investigations Type: general – SubjectFull: Empathy Type: general – SubjectFull: Individual Differences Type: general – SubjectFull: Compliance (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Social Behavior Type: general – SubjectFull: Experiments Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Responses Type: general – SubjectFull: Social Psychology Type: general – SubjectFull: Gender Differences Type: general – SubjectFull: Ethnicity Type: general – SubjectFull: Interpersonal Reactivity Index Type: general – SubjectFull: Beck Anxiety Inventory Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Replicating Milgram Would People Still Obey Today? Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burger, Jerry M. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2009 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0003-066X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 64 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: American Psychologist Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |