View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

Coparenting Behavior Moderates Longitudinal Relations between Effortful Control and Preschool Children's Externalizing Behavior

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Coparenting Behavior Moderates Longitudinal Relations between Effortful Control and Preschool Children's Externalizing Behavior
Language: English
Authors: Schoppe-Sullivan, Sarah J., Weldon, Arielle H., Cook, J. Claire
Source: Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. Jun 2009 50(6):698-706.
Availability: Blackwell Publishing. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8599; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: customerservices@blackwellpublishing.com; Web site: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/jnl_default.asp
Peer Reviewed: Y
Physical Description: PDF
Page Count: 9
Publication Date: 2009
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Behavior Problems, Emotional Response, Preschool Children, Longitudinal Studies, Self Control, Attention Control, Parenting Styles, Social Adjustment, Emotional Adjustment
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02009.x
ISSN: 0021-9630
Abstract: Background: Temperamental effortful control involves the voluntary control of attention and behavior. Deficits in effortful control put children at risk for developing externalizing behavior problems. Coparenting behavior, or the extent to which parents support or undermine each other's parenting efforts, has also been identified as an important correlate of children's socioemotional adjustment. The present study tested whether coparenting behavior moderated longitudinal relations between preschool children's effortful control and their externalizing behavior. Methods: Ninety-two families (mother, father, 4-year-old child) participated. Parents' coparenting behavior was observed during family interaction, and children's effortful control was rated by parents. At that time and one year later, mothers and teachers reported on children's externalizing behavior. Results: Supportive coparenting behavior moderated longitudinal relations between children's effortful control and mothers' and teachers' reports of their externalizing behavior, even when taking into account initial levels of externalizing behavior. Conclusions: Effective coparenting served as a buffer for children, such that when parents displayed high levels of supportive coparenting behavior, the link between low effortful control and increases in externalizing behavior was not observed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2009
Accession Number: EJ839714
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwFWr9OCcXeNDqllVSqsKfnuAAAA4jCB3wYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHRMIHOAgEAMIHIBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDL9WTEj2AkXO5UGMKwIBEICBml5TyaDvBXHSHEXoO98fUv3Wt7_58tiKnsOe6Jd6sZyAADNTrAaWds1GjAbHCwIp0qyQ6ZKFpl-XSmeDgfdHyRBP6tmskFjCRNQu9uCrq8RuVMWhwckx17ZwUZ9nDj53ya6fq0Zu9YtOrXQMvg8HLXo_n98jTjg9P1-g2OPXhbrrvun2VS4CqbbqO4sNgkzJ1nFy0hMG0THnC1w=
Text:
  Availability: 1
  Value: <anid>AN0039663003;jyy01jun.09;2024Jun04.07:35;v2.2.500</anid> <title id="AN0039663003-1">Coparenting behavior moderates longitudinal relations between effortful control and preschool children’s externalizing behavior. </title> <p>Background:  Temperamental effortful control involves the voluntary control of attention and behavior. Deficits in effortful control put children at risk for developing externalizing behavior problems. Coparenting behavior, or the extent to which parents support or undermine each other's parenting efforts, has also been identified as an important correlate of children's socioemotional adjustment. The present study tested whether coparenting behavior moderated longitudinal relations between preschool children's effortful control and their externalizing behavior. Methods:  Ninety‐two families (mother, father, 4‐year‐old child) participated. Parents' coparenting behavior was observed during family interaction, and children's effortful control was rated by parents. At that time and one year later, mothers and teachers reported on children's externalizing behavior. Results:  Supportive coparenting behavior moderated longitudinal relations between children's effortful control and mothers' and teachers' reports of their externalizing behavior, even when taking into account initial levels of externalizing behavior. Conclusions:  Effective coparenting served as a buffer for children, such that when parents displayed high levels of supportive coparenting behavior, the link between low effortful control and increases in externalizing behavior was not observed.</p> <p>Keywords: effortful control; externalizing behavior; Coparenting behavior</p> <p>Models seeking to explain children's socioemotional adjustment and maladjustment are increasingly taking into account both within‐person vulnerabilities with a posited genetic basis, such as temperament (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib10" id="ref1">10</reflink>]), and factors external to the individual, such as social environments, which may increase children's vulnerability or protect them from risk (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib12" id="ref2">12</reflink>]). This framework reflects a developmental psychopathology perspective ([<reflink idref="bib23" id="ref3">23</reflink>]), and is also in keeping with other conceptualizations of the etiology and maintenance of maladjustment that have placed increased emphasis on person‐by‐environment interactions ([<reflink idref="bib6" id="ref4">6</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref5">32</reflink>]).</p> <p>One within‐person vulnerability that recent research has consistently identified as a risk for child maladjustment, particularly externalizing behavior, is low temperamental effortful control, or deficits in the ability to voluntarily control one's attention and behavior ([<reflink idref="bib29" id="ref6">29</reflink>]). At the same time, research on sources of vulnerability and protection for children within the family environment, guided by family systems theory (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib27" id="ref7">27</reflink>]), has expanded to implicate coparenting behavior as a unique source of risk or protection for children ([<reflink idref="bib25" id="ref8">25</reflink>]). Informed by both developmental psychopathology and family systems perspectives ([<reflink idref="bib5" id="ref9">5</reflink>]), the present study examined whether coparenting behavior moderated the link between preschool‐aged children's effortful control and their externalizing behavior.</p> <hd id="AN0039663003-2">Effortful control and externalizing behavior</hd> <p>[<reflink idref="bib29" id="ref10">29</reflink>] defined effortful control as 'the ability to inhibit a dominant response in order to perform a subdominant response' (p. 434). In a broader sense, effortful control is a component of temperament used for emotion‐related regulation that aids in the expression and control of emotional reactions and behaviors ([<reflink idref="bib11" id="ref11">11</reflink>]). As effortful control emerges over the first several years of life, children evidence remarkably stable individual differences in their capacities for effortful control ([<reflink idref="bib17" id="ref12">17</reflink>]).</p> <p>Consistent with the notion that effortful control has profound implications for social development ([<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref13">18</reflink>]), a number of studies have demonstrated links between children's effortful control and externalizing problems in community samples of normally developing children (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib13" id="ref14">13</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib37" id="ref15">37</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref16">39</reflink>]) as well as in samples of children with elevated levels of externalizing behavior ([<reflink idref="bib28" id="ref17">28</reflink>]). For example, [<reflink idref="bib17" id="ref18">17</reflink>] found that lower levels of effortful control in the toddler and preschool years portended higher levels of externalizing behavior at age 6.</p> <p>A child's capacity for effortful control is likely shaped not only by genetically based tendencies but also by the social environment ([<reflink idref="bib11" id="ref19">11</reflink>]). In particular, mothers' parenting has been implicated in the development of effortful control ([<reflink idref="bib17" id="ref20">17</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib37" id="ref21">37</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref22">40</reflink>]). Others have suggested that effortful control may interact with environmental factors in relation to children's behavioral adjustment ([<reflink idref="bib13" id="ref23">13</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib33" id="ref24">33</reflink>]), consistent with 'goodness‐of‐fit' or interactive models of vulnerability and protective factors (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib23" id="ref25">23</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref26">32</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib38" id="ref27">38</reflink>]). However, little research has considered whether aspects of the family environment beyond mothers' parenting may play a role in the processes linking children's effortful control and their adjustment.</p> <hd id="AN0039663003-3">Coparenting behavior as a moderator</hd> <p>One aspect of the broader family system that has received increasing attention from developmental researchers is the coparenting relationship, or in the terminology of family systems theory, the family's 'executive subsystem' ([<reflink idref="bib27" id="ref28">27</reflink>]). Coparenting behavior can be defined as the extent to which parents support or undermine each other's parenting efforts ([<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref29">3</reflink>]). Recent research has revealed persistent connections between coparenting behavior and young children's adjustment in community samples ([<reflink idref="bib25" id="ref30">25</reflink>]). The most consistent evidence links higher levels of undermining coparenting behavior and deficits in supportive coparenting behavior with higher levels of child externalizing behavior (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib4" id="ref31">4</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib26" id="ref32">26</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib34" id="ref33">34</reflink>]). Moreover, coparenting consistently explains additional variance in children's adjustment above and beyond both marital quality and dyadic parenting quality ([<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref34">3</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib15" id="ref35">15</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib26" id="ref36">26</reflink>]).</p> <p>However, research on coparenting has primarily focused on testing its direct or additive effects on children, and to date has not typically considered its potential interactive role. One exception is the work of [<reflink idref="bib21" id="ref37">21</reflink>], who demonstrated that coparenting interacted with children's vagal suppression (an index of emotion regulation) in relation to children's behavior with peers. In contrast to the coparenting literature, research on dyadic parenting has provided convincing evidence that parenting may interact with temperament in relation to children's adjustment ([<reflink idref="bib2" id="ref38">2</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib16" id="ref39">16</reflink>]). Thus, the primary goal of the current study was to advance the literature on coparenting by examining its interactive role with temperament in relation to children's externalizing behavior.</p> <hd id="AN0039663003-4">The present study</hd> <p>The purpose of this research was to examine whether coparenting behavior moderated relations between preschool‐aged children's effortful control and their externalizing behavior. Parents reported on children's effortful control and completed an observational assessment of coparenting behavior when their child was 4 years old. At that time and one year later, mothers and children's preschool or kindergarten teachers reported on children's externalizing behavior. Consistent with past research (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib17" id="ref40">17</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref41">40</reflink>]), we hypothesized that children with lower initial levels of effortful control would exhibit higher levels of externalizing behavior both concurrently and one year later. Similarly, we expected that children from families with supportive coparents would demonstrate lower levels of externalizing behavior, whereas those from families characterized by undermining coparenting would demonstrate higher levels of externalizing behavior ([<reflink idref="bib26" id="ref42">26</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib34" id="ref43">34</reflink>]). However, we further anticipated that coparenting behavior would moderate relations between children's effortful control and their externalizing behavior, consistent with interactive models of vulnerability and protective factors (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib23" id="ref44">23</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref45">32</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib38" id="ref46">38</reflink>]). Specifically, we expected that low effortful control would be a risk for increases in externalizing behavior only when parents showed high levels of undermining and low levels of supportive coparenting behavior, but not when parents displayed high levels of supportive and low levels of undermining coparenting behavior.</p> <hd id="AN0039663003-5">Method</hd> <p></p> <hd id="AN0039663003-6">Participants</hd> <p>Participating families (mother, father, 4‐year‐old child) were drawn from a short‐term longitudinal study of family relationships and children's development. Participating parents were required to be married or cohabiting together with the focal child. Families were recruited through a network of local preschools and day care centers, as well as through advertisements and word‐of‐mouth. At Phase 1 of the study, 113 families participated. Ninety‐two families (81%) participated in the second phase. Attrition was primarily due to an inability to locate/contact families, geographic relocation of families, or families indicating a lack of available time to participate. The 92 families whose data are considered in this report were not significantly different from the larger sample on any child, parent, or family demographic characteristics. With respect to key study variables (see descriptions below), only one significant difference was found: children who participated in the follow‐up had fewer externalizing behaviors as reported by their teachers on the Conners questionnaire, <emph>t</emph>(<reflink idref="bib93" id="ref47">93</reflink>) = –2.03, <emph>p </emph>< .05.</p> <p>At Phase 1, participating children were approximately 4.11 years old (<emph>SD</emph> = .49 years; 48 boys, 44 girls). Seventy‐eight percent of children who participated were European American, 7% African American, 1% Asian, 1% Hispanic, and 13% were of mixed ethnicity. Mothers' ages ranged from 26 to 56 years (<emph>M </emph>=<emph> </emph>36.15 years; <emph>SD</emph> = 5.32). Fathers' ages ranged from 27 to 57 years (<emph>M </emph>=<emph> </emph>38.06 years; <emph>SD</emph> = 5.93). Participants' annual family income ranged from less than $10,000 to over $100,000 (<emph>Mdn</emph> = $71,000 to 80,000). Eighty‐six percent of mothers and 81% of fathers had obtained at least a college degree (range: high school degree to Ph.D.). All couples were married or cohabiting for an average of 9.16 years (<emph>SD</emph> = 4.47 years).</p> <hd id="AN0039663003-7">Procedure</hd> <p>At Phase 1, parents and children visited the laboratory together for 1.5 hours. At the visit, mothers and fathers completed a temperament questionnaire about their child independently, and mothers reported about their children's behavior. Parents were also asked to name a preschool teacher or child care provider who knew their child well. Researchers mailed questionnaires regarding children's behavior to the named individual. Seventy‐eight of these individuals returned completed questionnaires (85%). At the Phase 1 assessment, mothers, fathers, and children were also videotaped while completing two 10‐minute tasks together. These tasks were designed to elicit coparenting behavior, as they required parents to work together with their child towards attainment of a particular goal ([<reflink idref="bib34" id="ref48">34</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib35" id="ref49">35</reflink>]). The first task required families to draw a picture of their family together, and the second task required them to build a house out of a toy building set.</p> <p>At Phase 2, approximately one year later, mothers again reported on children's behavior, as did children's preschool or kindergarten teachers (<reflink idref="bib79" id="ref50">79</reflink>, or 86%, of these individuals returned completed questionnaires). In accordance with procedures approved by the university's institutional review board, informed consent was obtained from parents at both phases of the study. For participation, families received a $30 gift card to a local store at Phase 1 and $50 cash at Phase 2. Children's teachers received $5 for completing questionnaires about the child's behavior (gift card at Phase 1; cash at Phase 2).</p> <hd id="AN0039663003-8">Measures: Phase 1</hd> <p> <bold>Children's effortful control. </bold> Mothers and fathers each completed the 36‐item Very Short Form of the Children's Behavior Questionnaire, designed to assess three broad temperament factors (Surgency, Negative Affect, and Effortful Control) in children aged 3–8 ([<reflink idref="bib31" id="ref51">31</reflink>]). For the purposes of this study we focused on mothers' and fathers' reports on the 12‐item Effortful Control scale (α = .72 for mothers and.75 for fathers). Parents' reports were significantly correlated, <emph>r </emph>= .46, <emph>p </emph>< .01, and thus were averaged to create a single index of effortful control.</p> <p> <bold>Observed coparenting behavior. </bold> The videotaped drawing and building episodes were coded for coparenting behavior by a team of trained raters using 5‐point rating scales (1 = <emph>very low</emph>; 5 = <emph>very high</emph>) developed by [<reflink idref="bib8" id="ref52">8</reflink>] and used in previous investigations ([<reflink idref="bib34" id="ref53">34</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib35" id="ref54">35</reflink>]). 'Coparenting events,' according to [<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref55">3</reflink>], occur when one parent either supports and/or undermines the other parent's parenting goals or intentions. Thus, coparenting reflects partners' behaviors toward each other with reference to the child or parenting, but does not directly include individual parent behavior toward the child or partner‐directed behaviors unrelated to the child or parenting. Coders made note of the nature of coparenting events observed during the interactions and then rated the overall quality of coparenting events on seven dimensions: <emph>pleasure</emph>, <emph>warmth</emph>, <emph>cooperation</emph>, <emph>interactiveness</emph>, <emph>displeasure</emph>, <emph>anger</emph>, and <emph>competition</emph>. For detailed descriptions of these scales see [<reflink idref="bib34" id="ref56">34</reflink>] and [<reflink idref="bib35" id="ref57">35</reflink>]. Each family received two sets of ratings on the seven scales – one set each for the drawing and building episodes. These ratings were summed to assign each family one score on each dimension across the 20 minutes of observed interaction.</p> <p>Each of the two raters was randomly assigned half of the drawing and half of the building episodes, and the same coder did not rate a family across both episodes. Exceptions included episodes that both team members coded to establish reliability (29%). Several measures of interrater reliability are reported. Weighted kappas averaged.67 (range: from.59 to.74), reflecting moderate to substantial agreement ([<reflink idref="bib20" id="ref58">20</reflink>]). Gamma coefficients, which are particularly appropriate for ordinal data ([<reflink idref="bib14" id="ref59">14</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib22" id="ref60">22</reflink>]), ranged from.78 to.94 (<emph>M </emph>= .88), reflecting acceptable reliability.</p> <p>The coding data were reduced using principal components analysis with varimax rotation. This analysis yielded two components. Component 1 (Eigenvalue = 2.97; 42.46% variance) was characterized by high loadings for pleasure (.846), warmth (.864), cooperation (.735), and interactiveness (.678), and was thus called Supportive Coparenting. Component 2 (Eigenvalue = 1.85; 26.46% variance) indicated high loadings for the other three scales – displeasure (.853), anger (.852), and competition (.770) – and was named Undermining Coparenting. These components are similar to those obtained in other studies that employed the same coding system (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib35" id="ref61">35</reflink>]). Factor scores for these two components based on the rotated solution were used for subsequent analyses.</p> <hd id="AN0039663003-9">Measures: Phase 1 and Phase 2</hd> <p> <bold>Mothers' reports of children's behavior. </bold> Mothers completed the reliable, valid, and widely used Child Behavior Checklist for children ages 1.5–5 years (CBCL; [<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref62">1</reflink>]). For the purposes of the present study, analyses focused on the Externalizing (24 items) factor (α = .91 at Phases 1 and 2).</p> <p>Mothers also completed the Conners questionnaire ([<reflink idref="bib7" id="ref63">7</reflink>]), a 10‐item measure of children's externalizing behavior used in previous research on coparenting ([<reflink idref="bib34" id="ref64">34</reflink>]). Each item (e.g., 'constantly fidgeting') is rated on a 4‐point scale (1 = <emph>not at all</emph>; 4 = <emph>very much</emph>). Cronbach's alphas were.87 at Phase 1 and.86 at Phase 2.</p> <p>Mothers' reports on the CBCL Externalizing Scale were significantly and strongly correlated with their Conners reports (<emph>r </emph>= .71, <emph>p </emph>< .01 at Phase 1; <emph>r </emph>= .79, <emph>p </emph>< .01 at Phase 2). Thus, the CBCL and Conners scores were standardized and combined to form a composite measure of mother‐reported externalizing behavior at each phase.</p> <p> <bold>Teachers' reports of children's behavior. </bold> Each child's teacher or childcare provider completed the 30‐item Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation Scale – Short Form (SCBE‐30; [<reflink idref="bib19" id="ref65">19</reflink>]), a measure specifically designed to assess 3–6‐year‐old children's behavior in the classroom context. Teachers rated the presence of particular behaviors in the child on a 6‐point scale (1 = <emph>never</emph>; 6 = <emph>always</emph>). The SCBE‐30 contains three 10‐item scales: social competence, anger/aggression, and anxiety/withdrawal. For the purposes of the present study, we focused on the scale assessing externalizing behavior (anger/aggression; α = .89 at Phase 1 and.88 at Phase 2).</p> <p>Children's teachers or childcare providers also completed the Conners questionnaire (described above); α = .90 at Phase 1 and.87 at Phase 2. Teachers' reports on the Conners and on the anger/aggression scale of the SCBE‐30 were significantly and strongly correlated (<emph>r </emph>= .82, <emph>p </emph>< .01 at Phase 1; <emph>r </emph>= .83, <emph>p </emph>< .01 at Phase 2), and thus were standardized and combined to create a single index of teacher‐reported externalizing behavior at each phase. Mothers' and teachers' reports of externalizing behavior, although moderately correlated (Table 2), were maintained separately for use in analyses given that children may behave differently in home and school contexts ([<reflink idref="bib24" id="ref66">24</reflink>]).</p> <p>2  Intercorrelations for child effortful control, coparenting behavior, and child externalizing behavior</p> <p> <ephtml> <table><thead valign="bottom"><tr><th /><th>1.</th><th>2.</th><th>3.</th><th>4.</th><th>5.</th><th>6.</th><th>7.</th><th>8.</th><th>9.</th><th>10.</th><th>11.</th></tr></thead><tbody valign="top"><tr><td>Phase 1</td></tr><tr><td>  1. Child Effortful Control</td><td>1</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>  2. Supportive Coparenting Behavior</td><td>.12</td><td>1</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>  3. Undermining Coparenting Behavior</td><td>.15</td><td>.00</td><td>1</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>  4. Mother's CBCL Externalizing</td><td>–.20</td><td>–.11</td><td>.01</td><td>1</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>  5. Mother's Conners</td><td>–.21*</td><td>–.09</td><td>–.05</td><td>.79**</td><td>1</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>  6. Teacher's SCBE Anger/Aggression</td><td>–.42**</td><td>–.02</td><td>.15</td><td>.43**</td><td>.51**</td><td>1</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>  7. Teacher's Conners</td><td>–.38**</td><td>–.08</td><td>.12</td><td>.32**</td><td>.44**</td><td>.82**</td><td>1</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>Phase 2</td></tr><tr><td>  8. Mother's CBCL Externalizing</td><td>–.27**</td><td>–.02</td><td>.04</td><td>.79**</td><td>.64**</td><td>.54**</td><td>.47**</td><td>1</td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td>  9. Mother's Conners</td><td>–.28**</td><td>–.07</td><td>–.08</td><td>.71**</td><td>.80**</td><td>.57**</td><td>.51**</td><td>.79**</td><td>1</td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> 10. Teacher's SCBE Anger/Aggression</td><td>–.38**</td><td>–.07</td><td>.07</td><td>.17</td><td>.26*</td><td>.59**</td><td>.56**</td><td>.39**</td><td>.40**</td><td>1</td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> 11. Teacher's Conners</td><td>–.41**</td><td>–.07</td><td>.05</td><td>.22*</td><td>.30**</td><td>.57**</td><td>.52**</td><td>.34**</td><td>.36**</td><td>.83**</td><td>1</td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <p>1 *<emph>p </emph>< .05; **<emph>p </emph>< .01.</p> <hd id="AN0039663003-10">Results</hd> <p>Descriptive statistics for all variables are presented in Table 1. Data analysis was conducted in two steps. First, associations among child effortful control, supportive and undermining coparenting behavior, and mothers' and teachers' perceptions of children's externalizing behavior were examined. Second, a series of hierarchical regression equations was computed to examine the combined effects of child effortful control and coparenting behavior at Phase 1 on children's behavior at Phase 2. Separate equations were conducted predicting mothers' versus teachers' perceptions of children's externalizing behavior. In each equation, children's externalizing behavior at Phase 1 was entered on the first step, to conduct an especially strong test of the roles of effortful control, coparenting behavior, and their interactions as predictors of children's behavior. By controlling for externalizing behavior at Phase 1, we essentially tested whether the other variables predicted <emph>change</emph> in externalizing behavior over time. Next, effortful control and supportive and undermining coparenting behavior were entered together on the second step. On the third and final step, the Effortful Control × Supportive Coparenting and Effortful Control × Undermining Coparenting interaction terms were entered. Before the creation of the interaction terms, all independent variables were mean‐centered. Significant interactions were graphed and probed according to procedures detailed in [<reflink idref="bib30" id="ref67">30</reflink>].</p> <p>1  Means and standard deviations of study variables</p> <p> <ephtml> <table><thead valign="bottom"><tr><th /><th><italic>M</italic></th><th><italic>SD</italic></th><th><italic>N</italic></th></tr></thead><tbody valign="top"><tr><td>Phase 1</td></tr><tr><td> Child Effortful Control</td><td>5.41</td><td>.58</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td> Supportive Coparenting Behavior<sup>a</sup></td><td>.00</td><td>1.00</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>  Pleasure</td><td>5.86</td><td>1.16</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>  Warmth</td><td>5.09</td><td>.98</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>  Cooperation</td><td>5.91</td><td>1.00</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>  Interactiveness</td><td>5.30</td><td>.99</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td> Undermining Coparenting Behavior<sup>a</sup></td><td>.00</td><td>1.00</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>  Displeasure</td><td>4.20</td><td>1.19</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>  Anger</td><td>3.01</td><td>.94</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td>  Competition</td><td>3.64</td><td>1.10</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td> Mother's CBCL Externalizing</td><td>11.65</td><td>7.62</td><td>89</td></tr><tr><td> Mother's Conners</td><td>16.49</td><td>4.91</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td> Teacher's SCBE Anger/Aggression</td><td>17.22</td><td>6.77</td><td>77</td></tr><tr><td> Teacher's Conners</td><td>14.46</td><td>4.90</td><td>78</td></tr><tr><td>Phase 2</td><td /><td /><td /></tr><tr><td> Mother's CBCL Externalizing</td><td>9.90</td><td>7.12</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td> Mother's Conners</td><td>15.48</td><td>4.46</td><td>92</td></tr><tr><td> Teacher's SCBE Anger/Aggression</td><td>15.00</td><td>5.63</td><td>79</td></tr><tr><td> Teacher's Conners</td><td>14.04</td><td>4.69</td><td>79</td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <ulist> <item>2 <sups>a</sups>Factor scores derived from principal components analysis.</item> <item>3 <emph>N</emph>s vary as a function of missing data as specified above.</item> </ulist> <hd id="AN0039663003-11">Associations among child effortful control, coparenting behavior, and children's behavior</hd> <p>First, correlations among child effortful control, supportive and undermining coparenting behavior, and mothers' and teachers' reports of children's externalizing behavior were computed (Table 2). As anticipated, children rated lower on effortful control at Phase 1 were rated significantly higher on externalizing by mothers and teachers both concurrently and one year later, with the exception of one nonsignificant correlation between child effortful control and mothers' CBCL reports at Phase 1. Contrary to expectations, there were no significant direct relations between coparenting behavior and children's externalizing behavior. All measures of externalizing behavior showed statistically significant, moderate to strong stability over time.</p> <hd id="AN0039663003-12">Regressions predicting children's behavior from effortful control and coparenting behavior</hd> <p>Next we conducted regression analyses to test whether observed coparenting behavior moderated relations between child effortful control and children's externalizing behavior. When predicting mothers' reports of children's externalizing behavior, the Effortful Control × Supportive Coparenting interaction was significant, as anticipated, in addition to the expected main effects of externalizing and effortful control at Phase 1 (Table 3). A graph of this interaction effect is presented in Figure 1. A simple slopes analysis indicated that the slope of the line representing low levels of supportive coparenting was significantly different from zero, <emph>t </emph>= –2.95, <emph>p </emph>< .01, whereas the slope of the line representing high levels of supportive coparenting was not, <emph>t </emph>= .25, <emph>p </emph>= .80.</p> <p>3  Regressions testing coparenting as a moderator of the associations between child effortful control and child externalizing behavior</p> <p> <ephtml> <table><thead valign="bottom"><tr><th>Step</th><th>Predictor</th><th>β</th><th>Δ<italic>R</italic><sup><italic>2</italic></sup></th><th>Δ<italic>F</italic></th></tr></thead><tbody valign="top"><tr><td /><td /><td>Phase 2 Externalizing (Mother)</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>Phase 1 Externalizing (Mother)</td><td>.82**</td><td>.67</td><td>180.67**</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Child Effortful Control</td><td>–.13*</td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td /><td>Supportive Coparenting</td><td>.05</td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td /><td>Undermining Coparenting</td><td>.02</td><td>.02</td><td>1.67</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Effortful Control × Supportive Coparenting</td><td>.14*</td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td /><td>Effortful Control × Undermining Coparenting</td><td>.03</td><td>.02</td><td>2.31</td></tr><tr><td /><td /><td><italic>R</italic><sup><italic>2 </italic></sup>=<sup><italic> </italic></sup>.70 F(6,85) = 33.34**</td></tr><tr><td /><td /><td>Phase 2 Externalizing (Teacher)</td></tr><tr><td>1</td><td>Phase 1 Externalizing (Teacher)</td><td>.61**</td><td>.37</td><td>40.41**</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>Child Effortful Control</td><td>–.21*</td><td><italic> </italic></td><td> </td></tr><tr><td /><td>Supportive Coparenting</td><td>–.06</td><td><italic> </italic></td><td> </td></tr><tr><td /><td>Undermining Coparenting</td><td>.10</td><td>.05</td><td>1.77</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>Effortful Control × Supportive Coparenting</td><td>.23*</td><td><italic> </italic></td><td> </td></tr><tr><td /><td>Effortful Control × Undermining Coparenting</td><td>–.11</td><td>.06</td><td>3.59*</td></tr><tr><td /><td /><td><italic>R</italic><sup><italic>2 </italic></sup>=<sup><italic> </italic></sup>.48 <italic>F</italic>(6,63) = 9.67**</td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <p>4 *<emph>p </emph>< .05; **<emph>p </emph>< .01.</p> <p>Graph: 1 Supportive coparenting moderates the relation between children's effortful control and change in Mothers' Reports of children's externalizing behavior from Phase 1 to Phase 2</p> <p>A similar, significant Effortful Control × Supportive Coparenting interaction effect was found when predicting teachers' reports of children's externalizing behavior, again over and above the significant main effects of externalizing and effortful control at Phase 1 (Table 3). This interaction effect is depicted in Figure 2. The results of the simple slopes analyses again indicated that the negative relation between effortful control and externalizing behavior held for children in families low on supportive coparenting behavior, <emph>t </emph>= –3.17, <emph>p </emph>< .01, but not for those children in families headed by highly supportive coparents, <emph>t </emph>= .17, <emph>p </emph>= .87.</p> <p>Graph: 2 Supportive coparenting moderates the relation between children's effortful control and change in teachers' reports of children's externalizing behavior from Phase 1 to Phase 2</p> <p>In sum, children with low levels of effortful control experienced <emph>increases</emph> in externalizing behavior over time only when their parents were low on supportive coparenting.</p> <p>In neither equation was undermining coparenting behavior a significant predictor of children's externalizing behavior either alone or in combination with effortful control.</p> <hd id="AN0039663003-13">Discussion</hd> <p>Findings from the present study are among the first to indicate that coparenting behavior may play an important interactive role in relation to children's socioemotional adjustment by moderating links between preschool‐aged children's temperamental effortful control and their externalizing behavior. By providing evidence for a temperament‐by‐coparenting interaction, these findings support and expand models emphasizing person‐by‐environment effects ([<reflink idref="bib6" id="ref68">6</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref69">32</reflink>]), for which prior support has typically come from studies of dyadic parenting (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib2" id="ref70">2</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib16" id="ref71">16</reflink>]).</p> <p>In particular, our results indicate that supportive coparenting served as a buffer for children with low effortful control – in the context of highly supportive coparenting behavior such children were not at increased risk for externalizing behavior. In the terms used by [<reflink idref="bib23" id="ref72">23</reflink>], this type of interaction effect can be described as a 'protective‐stabilizing' effect. Notably, this moderating effect emerged as significant in the context of controlling for children's initial levels of externalizing behavior, thus providing evidence that supportive coparenting behavior may have prevented growth in externalizing behavior over one year's time.</p> <p>However, what this study does not explicate are the mechanisms through which supportive coparenting behavior may act as a protective factor for children low in temperamental effortful control. A prime candidate may be dyadic parenting behavior. Unfortunately, the present study could not address the role of parenting because we did not collect measures of mothers' and fathers' individual parenting quality. It should be noted, however, that parenting likely doesn't fully mediate the effects of coparenting – a number of previous studies have demonstrated that coparenting explains variance in children's adjustment above and beyond effects of parenting ([<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref73">3</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib15" id="ref74">15</reflink>]). As such, it is possible that a different process was operating to produce our findings. For instance, supportive coparenting may promote a sense of family security in children that makes it easier for them to focus on effortful self‐regulation of their emotions and behavior ([<reflink idref="bib15" id="ref75">15</reflink>]). Alternatively, given the large body of research linking marital dynamics to children's functioning ([<reflink idref="bib9" id="ref76">9</reflink>]), it is also possible that marital relationship quality underlies the findings of the present study. However, just as coparenting predicts child adjustment over and above dyadic parenting, coparenting predicts child adjustment when taking into account marital quality as well ([<reflink idref="bib26" id="ref77">26</reflink>]). Clearly, understanding the processes through which coparenting is linked to children's adjustment is an important direction for future research.</p> <p>Although our hypothesis regarding the moderating role of supportive coparenting was borne out, we did not obtain direct associations between coparenting and children's externalizing behavior, nor did we find that undermining coparenting interacted with effortful control in relation to externalizing behavior. Previous work linking observed coparenting and children's adjustment has tended to focus on younger children (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib4" id="ref78">4</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib26" id="ref79">26</reflink>]) and has often utilized home observations of coparenting behavior (e.g., [<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref80">3</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib34" id="ref81">34</reflink>]). It is possible that the relative importance of direct versus moderating effects of coparenting, and of undermining versus supportive coparenting behavior, may change with the child's developmental level or that the laboratory setting for the observations in the present study elicited less undermining behavior than if families had been observed at home.</p> <p>The potential for supportive coparenting to serve as a protective factor is encouraging, in that coparenting behavior may be a malleable aspect of the family environment and thus amenable to intervention efforts ([<reflink idref="bib12" id="ref82">12</reflink>]). However, given that our sample consisted of relatively well‐functioning parents and few children with clinical‐level behavior problems, we caution against extrapolating from our findings to other populations prematurely.</p> <p>Before sound implications for intervention can be drawn from these findings, replication in more clinically‐relevant samples is necessary. Moreover, clinical samples of children and families are unlikely to conform to the sociodemographic profile of the current study's sample. Although in theory coparenting is an inclusive construct not limited to two‐parent, heterosexual, married families ([<reflink idref="bib25" id="ref83">25</reflink>]), the reality is that most coparenting research has focused on just such families, possibly limiting the generalizability of our results and those of others to families with other structures.</p> <p>Future research would also do well to improve upon the measurement of effortful control employed in this study by including observational as well as parent‐report data. Although parents have an unparalleled knowledge base with respect to their children's behavior ([<reflink idref="bib24" id="ref84">24</reflink>]), and research indicates convergence between observations and parent reports of children's effortful control ([<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref85">39</reflink>]), parents' ratings of temperament can be affected by a number of factors besides children's genetic tendencies ([<reflink idref="bib36" id="ref86">36</reflink>]). Moreover, effortful control is not unitary, but consists of several components including attentional focusing and inhibitory control which are discernable through the use of more fine‐grained assessments of effortful control ([<reflink idref="bib29" id="ref87">29</reflink>]). It may be that children with vulnerabilities in particular aspects of effortful control may be more or less susceptible to effects of the child rearing environment, including coparenting.</p> <p>Although longitudinal, the present study only followed children and families over one year's time, and thus it is not clear whether coparenting behavior would continue to moderate relations between children's effortful control and behavior problems over a longer span of time. It would be interesting for future work to consider whether, as some work suggests ([<reflink idref="bib11" id="ref88">11</reflink>]; [<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref89">40</reflink>]), aspects of parenting or coparenting actually modify children's levels of effortful control over time.</p> <hd id="AN0039663003-14">Conclusion</hd> <p>Even in the context of these caveats, however, the present study has drawn attention to supportive coparenting behavior as a factor that may buffer the effects of a temperamental vulnerability on children's short‐term risk for externalizing behavior. Should future research confirm the protective role of supportive coparenting behavior across diverse samples, interventions focused on increasing the amount of support between parents may prove useful for preventing the development of externalizing behavior problems among children with difficulties in voluntarily controlling their attention and behavior. The development and testing of such interventions might not only help promote positive adaptation among a vulnerable group of children, but would also have the potential to further support the role of the family environment in theoretical models of children's socioemotional development.</p> <hd id="AN0039663003-15">Key points:</hd> <p></p> <ulist> <item> • </item> <p></p> <item> Children with low temperamental effortful control are at risk for developing externalizing behavior.</item> <p></p> <item> • </item> <p></p> <item> Likewise, poor coparenting behavior also places children at risk for externalizing behavior.</item> <p></p> <item> • </item> <p></p> <item> Findings from this study indicate that supportive coparenting behavior moderated longitudinal relations between preschool children's effortful control and their externalizing behavior, even when taking into account initial levels of externalizing behavior.</item> <p></p> <item> • </item> <p></p> <item> Thus, effective coparenting served to buffer children with low effortful control from increases in externalizing behavior over one year's time.</item> <p></p> <item> • </item> <p></p> <item> Should these findings replicate in more diverse and clinically relevant samples, supportive coparenting may be a useful target for intervention.</item> </ulist> <hd id="AN0039663003-16">Acknowledgements</hd> <p>This research was supported by an NICHD grant (R03 HD050235) to the first author. We express gratitude to the parents, children, and teachers who participated in this study and the students who assisted with data collection and coding, especially Kimberly Snyder and Britt Thompson.</p> <ref id="AN0039663003-17"> <title> Footnotes </title> <blist> <bibl id="bib1" idref="ref62" type="bt">1</bibl> <bibtext> Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.</bibtext> </blist> </ref> <ref id="AN0039663003-18"> <title> References </title> <blist> <bibtext> Achenbach, T.M., & Rescorla, L.A. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA Preschool Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib2" idref="ref38" type="bt">2</bibl> <bibtext> Bates, J.E., Pettit, G.S., Dodge, K.A., & Ridge, B. (1998). Interaction of temperamental resistance to control and restrictive parenting in the development of externalizing behavior. Developmental Psychology, 34, 982 – 995.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib3" idref="ref29" type="bt">3</bibl> <bibtext> Belsky, J., Putnam, S., & Crnic, K. (1996). Coparenting, parenting, and early emotional development. In J.P. McHale, & P.A. Cowan (Eds.), Understanding how family‐level dynamics affect children's development: Studies of two‐parent families (New Directions for Child Development, Vol. 74) (pp. 45 – 55). San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib4" idref="ref31" type="bt">4</bibl> <bibtext> Belsky, J., Woodworth, S., & Crnic, K. (1996). Trouble in the second year: Three questions about family interaction. Child Development, 67, 556 – 578.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib5" idref="ref9" type="bt">5</bibl> <bibtext> Cicchetti, D., & Davies, P.T. (2004). Toward an integration of family systems and developmental psychopathology approaches. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 477 – 481.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib6" idref="ref4" type="bt">6</bibl> <bibtext> Collins, W.A., Maccoby, E.E., Steinberg, L., Hetherington, E.M., & Bornstein, M.H. (2000). Contemporary research on parenting: The case for nature and nurture. American Psychologist, 55, 218 – 232.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib7" idref="ref63" type="bt">7</bibl> <bibtext> Conners, C.K. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies with children. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 24 – 29.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib8" idref="ref52" type="bt">8</bibl> <bibtext> Cowan, C.P., & Cowan, P.A. (1996). Schoolchildren and their families project: Description of co‐parenting style ratings. Unpublished coding scales, University of California, Berkeley.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib9" idref="ref76" type="bt">9</bibl> <bibtext> Cummings, E.M., & Davies, P.T. (2002). Effects of marital conflict on children: Recent advances and emerging themes in process‐oriented research. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 31 – 63.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Deater‐Deckard, K., Petrill, S.A., & Thompson, L.A. (2007). Anger/frustration, task persistence, and conduct problems in childhood: A behavioral genetic analysis. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 80 – 87.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Eisenberg, N., Zhou, Q., Spinrad, T.L., Valiente, C., Fabes, R.A., & Liew, J. (2005). Relations among positive parenting, children's effortful control, and externalizing problems: A three‐wave longitudinal study. Child Development, 76, 1055 – 1071.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Feinberg, M.E., Button, T.M.M., Neiderhiser, J.M., Reiss, D., & Hetherington, E.M. (2007). Parenting and adolescent antisocial behavior and depression: Evidence of genotype × parenting environment interaction. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 457 – 465.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Gartstein, M.A., & Fagot, B.I. (2003). Parental depression, parenting and family adjustment, and child effortful control: Explaining externalizing behaviors for preschool children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 143 – 177.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Hays, W.L. (1981). Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Karreman, A., Van Tuijl, C., Van Aken, M.A.G., & Deković, M. (2008). Parenting, coparenting, and effortful control in preschoolers. Journal of Family Psychology, 22, 30 – 40.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Kochanska, G., Askan, N., & Joy, M.E. (2007). Children's fearfulness as a moderator of parenting in early socialization: Two longitudinal studies. Developmental Psychology, 43, 222 – 237.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Kochanska, G., & Knaack, A. (2003). Effortful control as a personality characteristic of young children: Antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Personality, 71, 1087 – 1112.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Kochanska, G., Murray, K.T., & Harlan, E.T. (2000). Effortful control in early childhood: Continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Developmental Psychology, 36, 220 – 232.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> LaFreniere, P., & Dumas, J.E. (1996). Social competence and behavior evaluation in children ages 3 to 6 years: The short form (SCBE‐30). Psychological Assessment, 8, 369 – 377.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159 – 174.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Leary, A., & Katz, L.F. (2004). Coparenting, family‐level processes, and peer outcomes: The moderating role of vagal tone. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 593 – 608.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Liebetrau, A.M. (1983). Measures of association. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Luthar, S.S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: A critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71, 543 – 562.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Mangelsdorf, S.C., Schoppe, S.J., & Buur, H. (2000). The meaning of parental reports: A contextual approach to the study of temperament and behavior problems in childhood. In V.J. Molfese, & D.L. Molfese (Eds.), Temperament and personality development across the lifespan (pp. 121 – 140). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> McHale, J., Khazan, I., Erera, P., Rotman, T., DeCourcey, W., & McConnell, M. (2002). Coparenting in diverse family systems. In M.H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (2nd edn, Vol. 3): Being and becoming a parent (pp. 75 – 107). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> McHale, J.P., & Rasmussen, J.L. (1998). Coparental and family group‐level dynamics during infancy: Early family precursors of child and family functioning during preschool. Development and Psychopathology, 10, 39 – 59.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Olson, S.L., Sameroff, A.J., Kerr, D.C.R., Lopez, N.L., & Wellman, H.L. (2005). Developmental foundations of externalizing problems in young children: The role of effortful control. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 25 – 45.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Posner, M.I., & Rothbart, M.K. (2000). Developing mechanisms of self‐regulation. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 427 – 441.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Preacher, K.J., Curran, P.J., & Bauer, D.J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437 – 448.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Putnam, S.P., & Rothbart, M.K. (2006). Development of short and very short forms of the Children's Behavior Questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 102 – 112.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Rothbart, M.K., & Bates, J.E. (2006). Temperament. In N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, & R.M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th edn, pp. 99 – 166). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Rubin, K.H., Burgess, K.B., Dwyer, K.M., & Hastings, P.D. (2003). Predicting preschoolers' externalizing behaviors from toddler temperament, conflict, and maternal negativity. Developmental Psychology, 39, 164 – 176.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Schoppe, S.J., Mangelsdorf, S.C., & Frosch, C.A. (2001). Coparenting, family process, and family structure: Implications for preschoolers' externalizing behavior problems. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 526 – 545.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Schoppe‐Sullivan, S.J., Mangelsdorf, S.C., Frosch, C.A., & McHale, J.L. (2004). Associations between coparenting and marital behavior from infancy to the preschool years. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 194 – 207.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Seifer, R. (2002). What do we learn from parent reports of their children's behavior? Commentary on Vaughn et al.'s critique of early temperament assessments. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 117 – 120.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Spinrad, T.L., Eisenberg, N., Gaertner, B., Popp, T., Smith, C.L., Kupfer, A., Greving, K., Liew, J., & Hofer, C. (2007). Relations of maternal socialization and toddlers' effortful control to children's adjustment and social competence. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1170 – 1186.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Thomas, A., & Chess, S. (1977). Temperament and development. New York: Brunner/Mazel.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Valiente, C., Eisenberg, N., Smith, C.L., Reiser, M., Fabes, R.A., Losoya, S., Guthrie, I.K., & Murphy, B.C. (2003). The relations of effortful control and reactive control to children's externalizing problems: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Personality, 71, 1171 – 1196.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Valiente, C., Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T.L., Reiser, M., Cumberland, A., Losoya, S.H., & Liew, J. (2006). Relations among mothers' expressivity, children's effortful control, and their problem behaviors: A four‐year longitudinal study. Emotion, 6, 459 – 472.</bibtext> </blist> </ref> <aug> <p>By Sarah J. Schoppe‐Sullivan; Arielle H. Weldon; J. Claire Cook; Evan F. Davis and Catherine K. Buckley</p> <p>Reported by Author; Author; Author; Author; Author</p> </aug> <nolink nlid="nl1" bibid="bib10" firstref="ref1"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl2" bibid="bib12" firstref="ref2"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl3" bibid="bib23" firstref="ref3"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl4" bibid="bib32" firstref="ref5"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl5" bibid="bib29" firstref="ref6"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl6" bibid="bib27" firstref="ref7"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl7" bibid="bib25" firstref="ref8"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl8" bibid="bib11" firstref="ref11"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl9" bibid="bib17" firstref="ref12"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl10" bibid="bib18" firstref="ref13"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl11" bibid="bib13" firstref="ref14"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl12" bibid="bib37" firstref="ref15"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl13" bibid="bib39" firstref="ref16"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl14" bibid="bib28" firstref="ref17"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl15" bibid="bib40" firstref="ref22"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl16" bibid="bib33" firstref="ref24"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl17" bibid="bib38" firstref="ref27"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl18" bibid="bib26" firstref="ref32"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl19" bibid="bib34" firstref="ref33"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl20" bibid="bib15" firstref="ref35"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl21" bibid="bib21" firstref="ref37"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl22" bibid="bib16" firstref="ref39"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl23" bibid="bib93" firstref="ref47"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl24" bibid="bib35" firstref="ref49"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl25" bibid="bib79" firstref="ref50"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl26" bibid="bib31" firstref="ref51"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl27" bibid="bib20" firstref="ref58"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl28" bibid="bib14" firstref="ref59"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl29" bibid="bib22" firstref="ref60"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl30" bibid="bib19" firstref="ref65"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl31" bibid="bib24" firstref="ref66"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl32" bibid="bib30" firstref="ref67"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl33" bibid="bib36" firstref="ref86"></nolink>
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ839714
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Coparenting Behavior Moderates Longitudinal Relations between Effortful Control and Preschool Children's Externalizing Behavior
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Schoppe-Sullivan%2C+Sarah+J%2E%22">Schoppe-Sullivan, Sarah J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Weldon%2C+Arielle+H%2E%22">Weldon, Arielle H.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cook%2C+J%2E+Claire%22">Cook, J. Claire</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Child+Psychology+and+Psychiatry%22"><i>Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry</i></searchLink>. Jun 2009 50(6):698-706.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Blackwell Publishing. 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148. Tel: 800-835-6770; Tel: 781-388-8599; Fax: 781-388-8232; e-mail: customerservices@blackwellpublishing.com; Web site: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/jnl_default.asp
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: PhysDesc
  Label: Physical Description
  Group: PhysDesc
  Data: PDF
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 9
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2009
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavior+Problems%22">Behavior Problems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Emotional+Response%22">Emotional Response</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preschool+Children%22">Preschool Children</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Longitudinal+Studies%22">Longitudinal Studies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Control%22">Self Control</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attention+Control%22">Attention Control</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Parenting+Styles%22">Parenting Styles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Adjustment%22">Social Adjustment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Emotional+Adjustment%22">Emotional Adjustment</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02009.x
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0021-9630
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Temperamental effortful control involves the voluntary control of attention and behavior. Deficits in effortful control put children at risk for developing externalizing behavior problems. Coparenting behavior, or the extent to which parents support or undermine each other's parenting efforts, has also been identified as an important correlate of children's socioemotional adjustment. The present study tested whether coparenting behavior moderated longitudinal relations between preschool children's effortful control and their externalizing behavior. Methods: Ninety-two families (mother, father, 4-year-old child) participated. Parents' coparenting behavior was observed during family interaction, and children's effortful control was rated by parents. At that time and one year later, mothers and teachers reported on children's externalizing behavior. Results: Supportive coparenting behavior moderated longitudinal relations between children's effortful control and mothers' and teachers' reports of their externalizing behavior, even when taking into account initial levels of externalizing behavior. Conclusions: Effective coparenting served as a buffer for children, such that when parents displayed high levels of supportive coparenting behavior, the link between low effortful control and increases in externalizing behavior was not observed.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2009
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ839714
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ839714
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02009.x
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 9
        StartPage: 698
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Behavior Problems
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Emotional Response
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Preschool Children
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Longitudinal Studies
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self Control
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Attention Control
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Parenting Styles
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social Adjustment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Emotional Adjustment
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Coparenting Behavior Moderates Longitudinal Relations between Effortful Control and Preschool Children's Externalizing Behavior
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Schoppe-Sullivan, Sarah J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Weldon, Arielle H.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cook, J. Claire
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 06
              Type: published
              Y: 2009
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0021-9630
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 50
            – Type: issue
              Value: 6
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
              Type: main
ResultId 1