Developer, Teacher, Student and Employer Evaluations of Competence-Based Assessment Quality
Saved in:
| Title: | Developer, Teacher, Student and Employer Evaluations of Competence-Based Assessment Quality |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Gulikers, J., Biemans, H., Mulder, M. |
| Source: | Studies in Educational Evaluation. Jun-Sep 2009 35(2-3):110-119. |
| Availability: | Elsevier. 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126; Tel: 407-345-4020; Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com; Web site: http://www.elsevier.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Physical Description: | |
| Page Count: | 10 |
| Publication Date: | 2009 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Evaluative |
| Descriptors: | Summative Evaluation, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Criteria, Educational Assessment, Evaluation Research, Stakeholders, Teacher Attitudes, Student Attitudes, Educational Research, Employer Attitudes, National Competency Tests, Educational Quality, Vocational Education, Program Effectiveness |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.05.002 |
| ISSN: | 0191-491X |
| Abstract: | This study examines how different stakeholders experience the quality of a nationally developed assessment framework for summative, competence-based assessment (CBA) in AVET, which aims to reflect theoretical characteristics of high quality CBAs. The quality of two summative CBAs, based on this national framework, is evaluated along an extensive, validated set of quality criteria for CBA evaluation and through involving key stakeholders (i.e., students, teachers, developers, and employers). By triangulating quantitative and qualitative evaluations and argumentations of key stakeholders, this study gives insight into the processes and characteristics that determine CBA quality in VET educational practice in relation to theoretical notions of high quality CBAs. Results support many theoretical characteristics and refine them for reaching quality in actual assessment practice. Strikingly, developers and teachers are more critical about the assessment quality than students and employers. The discussion reflects on the theoretical CBA characteristics in the light of the empirical findings and deduces practical implications for the national assessment framework as well as other summative CBAs in VET. (Contains 3 tables.) |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2009 |
| Accession Number: | EJ864190 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ864190 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Developer, Teacher, Student and Employer Evaluations of Competence-Based Assessment Quality – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gulikers%2C+J%2E%22">Gulikers, J.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Biemans%2C+H%2E%22">Biemans, H.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mulder%2C+M%2E%22">Mulder, M.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Studies+in+Educational+Evaluation%22"><i>Studies in Educational Evaluation</i></searchLink>. Jun-Sep 2009 35(2-3):110-119. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Elsevier. 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126; Tel: 407-345-4020; Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com; Web site: http://www.elsevier.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: PhysDesc Label: Physical Description Group: PhysDesc Data: PDF – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 10 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2009 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Evaluative – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Summative+Evaluation%22">Summative Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Criteria%22">Evaluation Criteria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Assessment%22">Educational Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Research%22">Evaluation Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stakeholders%22">Stakeholders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Attitudes%22">Teacher Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Research%22">Educational Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employer+Attitudes%22">Employer Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22National+Competency+Tests%22">National Competency Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Quality%22">Educational Quality</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocational+Education%22">Vocational Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Effectiveness%22">Program Effectiveness</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.05.002 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0191-491X – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study examines how different stakeholders experience the quality of a nationally developed assessment framework for summative, competence-based assessment (CBA) in AVET, which aims to reflect theoretical characteristics of high quality CBAs. The quality of two summative CBAs, based on this national framework, is evaluated along an extensive, validated set of quality criteria for CBA evaluation and through involving key stakeholders (i.e., students, teachers, developers, and employers). By triangulating quantitative and qualitative evaluations and argumentations of key stakeholders, this study gives insight into the processes and characteristics that determine CBA quality in VET educational practice in relation to theoretical notions of high quality CBAs. Results support many theoretical characteristics and refine them for reaching quality in actual assessment practice. Strikingly, developers and teachers are more critical about the assessment quality than students and employers. The discussion reflects on the theoretical CBA characteristics in the light of the empirical findings and deduces practical implications for the national assessment framework as well as other summative CBAs in VET. (Contains 3 tables.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2009 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ864190 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ864190 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.05.002 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 10 StartPage: 110 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Summative Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Criteria Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Stakeholders Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Employer Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: National Competency Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Quality Type: general – SubjectFull: Vocational Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Effectiveness Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Developer, Teacher, Student and Employer Evaluations of Competence-Based Assessment Quality Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gulikers, J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Biemans, H. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mulder, M. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2009 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0191-491X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 35 – Type: issue Value: 2-3 Titles: – TitleFull: Studies in Educational Evaluation Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |