Communication Privacy Management and College Instruction: Exploring the Rules and Boundaries that Frame Instructor Private Disclosures
Saved in:
| Title: | Communication Privacy Management and College Instruction: Exploring the Rules and Boundaries that Frame Instructor Private Disclosures |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Hosek, Angela M., Thompson, Jason |
| Source: | Communication Education. Jul 2009 58(3):327-349. |
| Availability: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Physical Description: | |
| Page Count: | 23 |
| Publication Date: | 2009 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Privacy, Self Disclosure (Individuals), Teacher Student Relationship, College Faculty, Motivation, Context Effect, Risk, Sanctions, Credibility, Classroom Communication, Theories |
| DOI: | 10.1080/03634520902777585 |
| ISSN: | 0363-4523 |
| Abstract: | This study examines the ways in which privacy rules are developed and boundaries are coordinated within the student-teacher relationship using Petronio's Communication Privacy Management theory as a framework. Forty-one college instructors described the specific criteria they use to develop privacy rules and the conditions under which boundaries become permeable surrounding the private information they shared with their students. Findings suggest that rules were created based on content and relational motivations and contextual factors. Teachers also assessed the risks and benefits to such disclosures and enacted various avoidant strategies to prevent sanctions, damage to their credibility, and to maintain student comfort. Privacy boundaries became permeable based on the relationship with the student and shared experiences. Interestingly, tensions arose for some teachers as they worked to negotiate the desire to remain true to their personal identities and maintain the expectations of their teaching role. (Contains 2 tables and 4 notes.) |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Number of References: | 58 |
| Entry Date: | 2009 |
| Accession Number: | EJ865196 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ865196 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Communication Privacy Management and College Instruction: Exploring the Rules and Boundaries that Frame Instructor Private Disclosures – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Hosek%2C+Angela+M%2E%22">Hosek, Angela M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thompson%2C+Jason%22">Thompson, Jason</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Communication+Education%22"><i>Communication Education</i></searchLink>. Jul 2009 58(3):327-349. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: PhysDesc Label: Physical Description Group: PhysDesc Data: PDF – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 23 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2009 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Privacy%22">Privacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Disclosure+%28Individuals%29%22">Self Disclosure (Individuals)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Student+Relationship%22">Teacher Student Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Motivation%22">Motivation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Context+Effect%22">Context Effect</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Risk%22">Risk</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sanctions%22">Sanctions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Credibility%22">Credibility</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classroom+Communication%22">Classroom Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theories%22">Theories</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1080/03634520902777585 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0363-4523 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study examines the ways in which privacy rules are developed and boundaries are coordinated within the student-teacher relationship using Petronio's Communication Privacy Management theory as a framework. Forty-one college instructors described the specific criteria they use to develop privacy rules and the conditions under which boundaries become permeable surrounding the private information they shared with their students. Findings suggest that rules were created based on content and relational motivations and contextual factors. Teachers also assessed the risks and benefits to such disclosures and enacted various avoidant strategies to prevent sanctions, damage to their credibility, and to maintain student comfort. Privacy boundaries became permeable based on the relationship with the student and shared experiences. Interestingly, tensions arose for some teachers as they worked to negotiate the desire to remain true to their personal identities and maintain the expectations of their teaching role. (Contains 2 tables and 4 notes.) – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Ref Label: Number of References Group: RefInfo Data: 58 – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2009 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ865196 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ865196 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/03634520902777585 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 23 StartPage: 327 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Privacy Type: general – SubjectFull: Self Disclosure (Individuals) Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Student Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: College Faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: Motivation Type: general – SubjectFull: Context Effect Type: general – SubjectFull: Risk Type: general – SubjectFull: Sanctions Type: general – SubjectFull: Credibility Type: general – SubjectFull: Classroom Communication Type: general – SubjectFull: Theories Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Communication Privacy Management and College Instruction: Exploring the Rules and Boundaries that Frame Instructor Private Disclosures Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Hosek, Angela M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Thompson, Jason IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Type: published Y: 2009 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0363-4523 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 58 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Communication Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |